{"title":"生物活性玻璃、纳米羟基磷灰石和酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙氟化浆三种再矿化剂对乳牙釉质侵蚀的体外比较研究","authors":"Ajay Reddy Mareddy, Venugopal N Reddy, Vasanthi Done, Tarannum Rehaman, Trisha Gadekar, Monica Raj","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>To compare and evaluate the effects of bioactive glass (BAG), nano hydroxyapatite (nHAp), and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF)-based slurry on surface microhardness (SMH) of demineralized enamel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight extracted deciduous teeth were disinfected in 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 hour and stored in 1% thymol prior to specimen preparation. Each tooth was decoronated at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and the crown was sectioned mesiodistally into two halves using a diamond disc. The slurry was prepared by suspending the respective remineralizing agent. The solutions were thoroughly stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 1 minute at room temperature before starting the potential of hydrogen (pH)-cycling. The pH values of all solutions were monitored with a pH-sensitive electrode. After completion of all cycles, microhardness and surface evaluation were done using the Vickers hardness test and sent for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data obtained were compiled, tabulated, and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS software version 23. ANOVA test and <i>post hoc</i> analysis-Bonferroni test-were used to assess SMH, with ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Vickers hardness values were analyzed using the ANOVA test. Group I (65.4 ± 3.49) showed the highest hardness value, followed by group IV (58.2 ± 5.02), group III (55.8 ± 10.8), the least among group V (54.2 ± 7.44), and group II (54.1 ± 6.37). The mean hardness values of group I showed a significant difference with all groups except group IV (<i>p</i> = 0.072).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>nHA had better potential to remineralize enamel. BAG, nHA, and CPP-ACPF enhanced the SMH values, thus can be considered effective for remineralization.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>(1) Nano hydroxyapatite promotes remineralization of enamel and would be advantageous in the treatment of enamel erosion. (2) Bioactive glass, nHAp, and CPP-ACPF improve the SMH values, thus can be considered effective for remineralization.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mareddy AR, Reddy VN, Done V, <i>et al</i>. Comparative Evaluation of Three Remineralization Agents-Bioactive Glass, Nanohydroxyapatite and Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate Fluoride-based Slurry on Enamel Erosion of Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(4):425-430.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 4","pages":"425-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Three Remineralization Agents-Bioactive Glass, Nanohydroxyapatite and Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate Fluoride-based Slurry on Enamel Erosion of Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Reddy Mareddy, Venugopal N Reddy, Vasanthi Done, Tarannum Rehaman, Trisha Gadekar, Monica Raj\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>To compare and evaluate the effects of bioactive glass (BAG), nano hydroxyapatite (nHAp), and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF)-based slurry on surface microhardness (SMH) of demineralized enamel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-eight extracted deciduous teeth were disinfected in 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 hour and stored in 1% thymol prior to specimen preparation. Each tooth was decoronated at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and the crown was sectioned mesiodistally into two halves using a diamond disc. The slurry was prepared by suspending the respective remineralizing agent. The solutions were thoroughly stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 1 minute at room temperature before starting the potential of hydrogen (pH)-cycling. The pH values of all solutions were monitored with a pH-sensitive electrode. After completion of all cycles, microhardness and surface evaluation were done using the Vickers hardness test and sent for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data obtained were compiled, tabulated, and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS software version 23. ANOVA test and <i>post hoc</i> analysis-Bonferroni test-were used to assess SMH, with ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Vickers hardness values were analyzed using the ANOVA test. Group I (65.4 ± 3.49) showed the highest hardness value, followed by group IV (58.2 ± 5.02), group III (55.8 ± 10.8), the least among group V (54.2 ± 7.44), and group II (54.1 ± 6.37). The mean hardness values of group I showed a significant difference with all groups except group IV (<i>p</i> = 0.072).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>nHA had better potential to remineralize enamel. BAG, nHA, and CPP-ACPF enhanced the SMH values, thus can be considered effective for remineralization.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>(1) Nano hydroxyapatite promotes remineralization of enamel and would be advantageous in the treatment of enamel erosion. (2) Bioactive glass, nHAp, and CPP-ACPF improve the SMH values, thus can be considered effective for remineralization.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mareddy AR, Reddy VN, Done V, <i>et al</i>. Comparative Evaluation of Three Remineralization Agents-Bioactive Glass, Nanohydroxyapatite and Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate Fluoride-based Slurry on Enamel Erosion of Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(4):425-430.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"425-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Evaluation of Three Remineralization Agents-Bioactive Glass, Nanohydroxyapatite and Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate Fluoride-based Slurry on Enamel Erosion of Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
Aims and background: To compare and evaluate the effects of bioactive glass (BAG), nano hydroxyapatite (nHAp), and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF)-based slurry on surface microhardness (SMH) of demineralized enamel.
Materials and methods: Thirty-eight extracted deciduous teeth were disinfected in 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 hour and stored in 1% thymol prior to specimen preparation. Each tooth was decoronated at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and the crown was sectioned mesiodistally into two halves using a diamond disc. The slurry was prepared by suspending the respective remineralizing agent. The solutions were thoroughly stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 1 minute at room temperature before starting the potential of hydrogen (pH)-cycling. The pH values of all solutions were monitored with a pH-sensitive electrode. After completion of all cycles, microhardness and surface evaluation were done using the Vickers hardness test and sent for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis.
Results: Data obtained were compiled, tabulated, and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS software version 23. ANOVA test and post hoc analysis-Bonferroni test-were used to assess SMH, with ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Vickers hardness values were analyzed using the ANOVA test. Group I (65.4 ± 3.49) showed the highest hardness value, followed by group IV (58.2 ± 5.02), group III (55.8 ± 10.8), the least among group V (54.2 ± 7.44), and group II (54.1 ± 6.37). The mean hardness values of group I showed a significant difference with all groups except group IV (p = 0.072).
Conclusion: nHA had better potential to remineralize enamel. BAG, nHA, and CPP-ACPF enhanced the SMH values, thus can be considered effective for remineralization.
Clinical significance: (1) Nano hydroxyapatite promotes remineralization of enamel and would be advantageous in the treatment of enamel erosion. (2) Bioactive glass, nHAp, and CPP-ACPF improve the SMH values, thus can be considered effective for remineralization.
How to cite this article: Mareddy AR, Reddy VN, Done V, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Three Remineralization Agents-Bioactive Glass, Nanohydroxyapatite and Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate Fluoride-based Slurry on Enamel Erosion of Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(4):425-430.