瞳孔动力学和因果知觉:来自瞳孔测量的见解。

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Miao Zhong, Yiwen Yu, Shiqi Tan, Xiangyong Yuan, Yi Jiang
{"title":"瞳孔动力学和因果知觉:来自瞳孔测量的见解。","authors":"Miao Zhong, Yiwen Yu, Shiqi Tan, Xiangyong Yuan, Yi Jiang","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Causality perception is fundamental to interpreting interactions between objects in the physical world. However, little is known about whether physiological responses, particularly pupil size, can implicitly track causality perception. This study employed pupillometry across three experiments to investigate the relationship between pupil dynamics and causality perception. The results revealed that spatiotemporally contiguous launching events (i.e., direct launching), perceived as a causal collision between two objects, induced greater pupil dilation after the collision than simple single-object motion (i.e., passing and pass-by events) or motion with a temporally inverted cause-effect order (i.e., temporal-inverted events), both of which lacked a causal structure. However, launching with a spatial gap (i.e., gap launching) also elicited pupil dilation comparable to direct launching, although gap launching was rated lower in perceived causality. Temporal-inverted events provoked early pupil dilation, corresponding to the sudden and spontaneous motion of the first object. Furthermore, for invariant visual stimuli that could be perceived as either causal launching or noncausal passing (i.e., ambiguous events), pupil size changes did not differentiate between subjective causal and noncausal judgments. These findings indicate that although pupil dilation was evident during causality perception, it was not uniquely or directly tied to causality perception but was influenced by multiple factors, particularly responses to spontaneous motion. This study deepens the understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying causality perception while also emphasizing the limitation of using pupillometry to examine it.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupil Dynamics and Causality Perception: Insights From Pupillometry.\",\"authors\":\"Miao Zhong, Yiwen Yu, Shiqi Tan, Xiangyong Yuan, Yi Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Causality perception is fundamental to interpreting interactions between objects in the physical world. However, little is known about whether physiological responses, particularly pupil size, can implicitly track causality perception. This study employed pupillometry across three experiments to investigate the relationship between pupil dynamics and causality perception. The results revealed that spatiotemporally contiguous launching events (i.e., direct launching), perceived as a causal collision between two objects, induced greater pupil dilation after the collision than simple single-object motion (i.e., passing and pass-by events) or motion with a temporally inverted cause-effect order (i.e., temporal-inverted events), both of which lacked a causal structure. However, launching with a spatial gap (i.e., gap launching) also elicited pupil dilation comparable to direct launching, although gap launching was rated lower in perceived causality. Temporal-inverted events provoked early pupil dilation, corresponding to the sudden and spontaneous motion of the first object. Furthermore, for invariant visual stimuli that could be perceived as either causal launching or noncausal passing (i.e., ambiguous events), pupil size changes did not differentiate between subjective causal and noncausal judgments. These findings indicate that although pupil dilation was evident during causality perception, it was not uniquely or directly tied to causality perception but was influenced by multiple factors, particularly responses to spontaneous motion. This study deepens the understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying causality perception while also emphasizing the limitation of using pupillometry to examine it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"e70080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因果关系感知是解释物理世界中物体之间相互作用的基础。然而,关于生理反应,特别是瞳孔大小,是否可以隐性地追踪因果关系感知,我们知之甚少。本研究采用瞳孔测量法在三个实验中探讨瞳孔动态与因果知觉之间的关系。结果表明,时空连续的发射事件(即直接发射),被视为两个物体之间的因果碰撞,在碰撞后引起的瞳孔扩张比简单的单物体运动(即通过和经过事件)或具有时间倒转因果顺序的运动(即时间倒转事件)更大,两者都缺乏因果结构。然而,与直接发射相比,以空间间隙发射(即间隙发射)也会引起瞳孔扩张,尽管间隙发射在感知因果关系上的评级较低。时间反转事件引起早期瞳孔扩张,与第一个物体的突然和自发运动相对应。此外,对于可以被感知为因果启动或非因果传递的不变视觉刺激(即,模糊事件),瞳孔大小的变化不会区分主观因果判断和非因果判断。这些发现表明,虽然瞳孔扩张在因果关系感知过程中很明显,但它并不是唯一或直接与因果关系感知相关,而是受到多种因素的影响,特别是对自发运动的反应。本研究加深了对因果知觉的生理机制的理解,同时也强调了使用瞳孔测量法检查因果知觉的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pupil Dynamics and Causality Perception: Insights From Pupillometry.

Causality perception is fundamental to interpreting interactions between objects in the physical world. However, little is known about whether physiological responses, particularly pupil size, can implicitly track causality perception. This study employed pupillometry across three experiments to investigate the relationship between pupil dynamics and causality perception. The results revealed that spatiotemporally contiguous launching events (i.e., direct launching), perceived as a causal collision between two objects, induced greater pupil dilation after the collision than simple single-object motion (i.e., passing and pass-by events) or motion with a temporally inverted cause-effect order (i.e., temporal-inverted events), both of which lacked a causal structure. However, launching with a spatial gap (i.e., gap launching) also elicited pupil dilation comparable to direct launching, although gap launching was rated lower in perceived causality. Temporal-inverted events provoked early pupil dilation, corresponding to the sudden and spontaneous motion of the first object. Furthermore, for invariant visual stimuli that could be perceived as either causal launching or noncausal passing (i.e., ambiguous events), pupil size changes did not differentiate between subjective causal and noncausal judgments. These findings indicate that although pupil dilation was evident during causality perception, it was not uniquely or directly tied to causality perception but was influenced by multiple factors, particularly responses to spontaneous motion. This study deepens the understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying causality perception while also emphasizing the limitation of using pupillometry to examine it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信