Miao Zhong, Yiwen Yu, Shiqi Tan, Xiangyong Yuan, Yi Jiang
{"title":"瞳孔动力学和因果知觉:来自瞳孔测量的见解。","authors":"Miao Zhong, Yiwen Yu, Shiqi Tan, Xiangyong Yuan, Yi Jiang","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Causality perception is fundamental to interpreting interactions between objects in the physical world. However, little is known about whether physiological responses, particularly pupil size, can implicitly track causality perception. This study employed pupillometry across three experiments to investigate the relationship between pupil dynamics and causality perception. The results revealed that spatiotemporally contiguous launching events (i.e., direct launching), perceived as a causal collision between two objects, induced greater pupil dilation after the collision than simple single-object motion (i.e., passing and pass-by events) or motion with a temporally inverted cause-effect order (i.e., temporal-inverted events), both of which lacked a causal structure. However, launching with a spatial gap (i.e., gap launching) also elicited pupil dilation comparable to direct launching, although gap launching was rated lower in perceived causality. Temporal-inverted events provoked early pupil dilation, corresponding to the sudden and spontaneous motion of the first object. Furthermore, for invariant visual stimuli that could be perceived as either causal launching or noncausal passing (i.e., ambiguous events), pupil size changes did not differentiate between subjective causal and noncausal judgments. These findings indicate that although pupil dilation was evident during causality perception, it was not uniquely or directly tied to causality perception but was influenced by multiple factors, particularly responses to spontaneous motion. This study deepens the understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying causality perception while also emphasizing the limitation of using pupillometry to examine it.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupil Dynamics and Causality Perception: Insights From Pupillometry.\",\"authors\":\"Miao Zhong, Yiwen Yu, Shiqi Tan, Xiangyong Yuan, Yi Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Causality perception is fundamental to interpreting interactions between objects in the physical world. However, little is known about whether physiological responses, particularly pupil size, can implicitly track causality perception. This study employed pupillometry across three experiments to investigate the relationship between pupil dynamics and causality perception. The results revealed that spatiotemporally contiguous launching events (i.e., direct launching), perceived as a causal collision between two objects, induced greater pupil dilation after the collision than simple single-object motion (i.e., passing and pass-by events) or motion with a temporally inverted cause-effect order (i.e., temporal-inverted events), both of which lacked a causal structure. However, launching with a spatial gap (i.e., gap launching) also elicited pupil dilation comparable to direct launching, although gap launching was rated lower in perceived causality. Temporal-inverted events provoked early pupil dilation, corresponding to the sudden and spontaneous motion of the first object. Furthermore, for invariant visual stimuli that could be perceived as either causal launching or noncausal passing (i.e., ambiguous events), pupil size changes did not differentiate between subjective causal and noncausal judgments. These findings indicate that although pupil dilation was evident during causality perception, it was not uniquely or directly tied to causality perception but was influenced by multiple factors, particularly responses to spontaneous motion. This study deepens the understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying causality perception while also emphasizing the limitation of using pupillometry to examine it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"e70080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pupil Dynamics and Causality Perception: Insights From Pupillometry.
Causality perception is fundamental to interpreting interactions between objects in the physical world. However, little is known about whether physiological responses, particularly pupil size, can implicitly track causality perception. This study employed pupillometry across three experiments to investigate the relationship between pupil dynamics and causality perception. The results revealed that spatiotemporally contiguous launching events (i.e., direct launching), perceived as a causal collision between two objects, induced greater pupil dilation after the collision than simple single-object motion (i.e., passing and pass-by events) or motion with a temporally inverted cause-effect order (i.e., temporal-inverted events), both of which lacked a causal structure. However, launching with a spatial gap (i.e., gap launching) also elicited pupil dilation comparable to direct launching, although gap launching was rated lower in perceived causality. Temporal-inverted events provoked early pupil dilation, corresponding to the sudden and spontaneous motion of the first object. Furthermore, for invariant visual stimuli that could be perceived as either causal launching or noncausal passing (i.e., ambiguous events), pupil size changes did not differentiate between subjective causal and noncausal judgments. These findings indicate that although pupil dilation was evident during causality perception, it was not uniquely or directly tied to causality perception but was influenced by multiple factors, particularly responses to spontaneous motion. This study deepens the understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying causality perception while also emphasizing the limitation of using pupillometry to examine it.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.