导航博士之旅:巴基斯坦博士学者幸福感的定性研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Naheed Mahsood, Usman Mahboob, Saima Aleem
{"title":"导航博士之旅:巴基斯坦博士学者幸福感的定性研究。","authors":"Naheed Mahsood, Usman Mahboob, Saima Aleem","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.5.11982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) scholars face unique challenges during their academic journey, frequently encountering substantial stressors that impact their overall well-being. We aimed to explore the concept and domains of well-being from PhD scholars' perspectives, focusing on the factors that affect their well-being during doctoral studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted over a period of six months, involving eleven in-depth interviews with medical and allied health sciences PhD scholars from nine universities across Pakistan using a qualitative phenomenology approach. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants, and an interview guide was developed after critically appraising the literature, feedback from medical education experts, and a pilot test. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes, accompanied by ten sub-themes, have been developed based on the socioecological theoretical framework, aligning with the key findings from eleven in-depth interviews. Five themes were identified from this study: (i)Well-being at the Individual Level, with the subthemes of mental, physical and emotional well-being and time management and work-life balance, (ii)Well-being at the Interpersonal Level, with the subthemes of supervisor and peer support and family and social support, (iii)Well-being at the Institutional Level, with the subthemes of administrative and financial support and academic stress and resources, (iv)Well-being at the Community Level, with the subthemes of professional growth and networking and cultural and gender influences and (v)Well-being at the Policy Level with the subthemes of HEC and institutional policy gaps and financial and research policy. This multifaceted approach offers a comprehensive understanding of the well-being of PhD scholars by addressing factors at multiple levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the multifaceted dimensions of well-being of PhD scholars at individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels. PhD scholars' mental, physical, and emotional health is influenced by time management and academic pressure. PhD scholars' interpersonal well-being depends on supervisors, peers, and family support. Effective administrative systems, financial support, and academic resources reduce scholar stress and improve institutional well-being. Opportunities for professional growth, networking, and cultural and gender recognition in the community are crucial for improving PhD scholars' well-being. Our results showed the need for policy reforms that prioritise research-focused PhD programs over coursework-focused ones, create more flexible publication criteria, and ensure enough financial assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 5","pages":"1402-1409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the doctoral journey: A qualitative study on PhD scholars' well-being in Pakistan.\",\"authors\":\"Naheed Mahsood, Usman Mahboob, Saima Aleem\",\"doi\":\"10.12669/pjms.41.5.11982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) scholars face unique challenges during their academic journey, frequently encountering substantial stressors that impact their overall well-being. We aimed to explore the concept and domains of well-being from PhD scholars' perspectives, focusing on the factors that affect their well-being during doctoral studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted over a period of six months, involving eleven in-depth interviews with medical and allied health sciences PhD scholars from nine universities across Pakistan using a qualitative phenomenology approach. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants, and an interview guide was developed after critically appraising the literature, feedback from medical education experts, and a pilot test. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes, accompanied by ten sub-themes, have been developed based on the socioecological theoretical framework, aligning with the key findings from eleven in-depth interviews. Five themes were identified from this study: (i)Well-being at the Individual Level, with the subthemes of mental, physical and emotional well-being and time management and work-life balance, (ii)Well-being at the Interpersonal Level, with the subthemes of supervisor and peer support and family and social support, (iii)Well-being at the Institutional Level, with the subthemes of administrative and financial support and academic stress and resources, (iv)Well-being at the Community Level, with the subthemes of professional growth and networking and cultural and gender influences and (v)Well-being at the Policy Level with the subthemes of HEC and institutional policy gaps and financial and research policy. This multifaceted approach offers a comprehensive understanding of the well-being of PhD scholars by addressing factors at multiple levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the multifaceted dimensions of well-being of PhD scholars at individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels. PhD scholars' mental, physical, and emotional health is influenced by time management and academic pressure. PhD scholars' interpersonal well-being depends on supervisors, peers, and family support. Effective administrative systems, financial support, and academic resources reduce scholar stress and improve institutional well-being. Opportunities for professional growth, networking, and cultural and gender recognition in the community are crucial for improving PhD scholars' well-being. Our results showed the need for policy reforms that prioritise research-focused PhD programs over coursework-focused ones, create more flexible publication criteria, and ensure enough financial assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"1402-1409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130926/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.5.11982\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.5.11982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:哲学博士(PhD)学者在他们的学术旅程中面临着独特的挑战,经常遇到影响他们整体健康的实质性压力源。我们旨在从博士学者的角度探讨幸福感的概念和领域,重点关注博士研究期间影响他们幸福感的因素。方法:本定性研究历时6个月,采用定性现象学方法,对来自巴基斯坦9所大学的医学和相关健康科学博士学者进行了11次深度访谈。采用有目的的抽样方法招募参与者,并在批判性地评估文献、医学教育专家的反馈和试点测试后制定访谈指南。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:基于社会生态学理论框架,与11次深度访谈的主要发现相一致,开发了五个主要主题,伴随着十个副主题。本研究确定了五个主题:(i)个人层面的幸福,包括精神、身体和情感幸福、时间管理和工作与生活平衡等分主题;(ii)人际层面的幸福,包括导师和同伴支持、家庭和社会支持等分主题;(iii)机构层面的幸福,包括行政和财政支持、学业压力和资源等分主题;(iv)社区层面的幸福;(五)政策层面的福祉,分主题为高等教育和体制政策差距以及财政和研究政策。这种多方面的方法通过解决多个层面的因素,提供了对博士学者福祉的全面理解。结论:本研究从个人、人际关系、机构、社区和政策层面突出了博士学者幸福感的多维度。博士生的心理、身体和情感健康受到时间管理和学业压力的影响。博士生的人际关系幸福感取决于导师、同伴和家庭支持。有效的行政系统、财政支持和学术资源减少了学者的压力,提高了机构的福利。专业成长的机会、人际网络、社区文化和性别认知对于提高博士学者的幸福感至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,需要进行政策改革,优先考虑以研究为重点的博士项目,而不是以课程为重点的项目,制定更灵活的出版标准,并确保足够的财政援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating the doctoral journey: A qualitative study on PhD scholars' well-being in Pakistan.

Background & objective: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) scholars face unique challenges during their academic journey, frequently encountering substantial stressors that impact their overall well-being. We aimed to explore the concept and domains of well-being from PhD scholars' perspectives, focusing on the factors that affect their well-being during doctoral studies.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted over a period of six months, involving eleven in-depth interviews with medical and allied health sciences PhD scholars from nine universities across Pakistan using a qualitative phenomenology approach. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit participants, and an interview guide was developed after critically appraising the literature, feedback from medical education experts, and a pilot test. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data.

Results: Five main themes, accompanied by ten sub-themes, have been developed based on the socioecological theoretical framework, aligning with the key findings from eleven in-depth interviews. Five themes were identified from this study: (i)Well-being at the Individual Level, with the subthemes of mental, physical and emotional well-being and time management and work-life balance, (ii)Well-being at the Interpersonal Level, with the subthemes of supervisor and peer support and family and social support, (iii)Well-being at the Institutional Level, with the subthemes of administrative and financial support and academic stress and resources, (iv)Well-being at the Community Level, with the subthemes of professional growth and networking and cultural and gender influences and (v)Well-being at the Policy Level with the subthemes of HEC and institutional policy gaps and financial and research policy. This multifaceted approach offers a comprehensive understanding of the well-being of PhD scholars by addressing factors at multiple levels.

Conclusion: This study highlighted the multifaceted dimensions of well-being of PhD scholars at individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy levels. PhD scholars' mental, physical, and emotional health is influenced by time management and academic pressure. PhD scholars' interpersonal well-being depends on supervisors, peers, and family support. Effective administrative systems, financial support, and academic resources reduce scholar stress and improve institutional well-being. Opportunities for professional growth, networking, and cultural and gender recognition in the community are crucial for improving PhD scholars' well-being. Our results showed the need for policy reforms that prioritise research-focused PhD programs over coursework-focused ones, create more flexible publication criteria, and ensure enough financial assistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信