机器人辅助人工耳蜗植入电极阵列插入系统的初步外科医生经验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004554
Rick F Nelson, Amanda R Ernst, Oliver Adunka, S Babu, Matthew L Carlson, Alexander D Claussen, Nicholas L Deep, Bruce J Gantz, Jay A Gantz, Richard Gurgel, Robert Hong, Xiaoyang Hua, Daniel Lee, Neil Patel, Felipe Santos, Charles Yates, Marlan R Hansen
{"title":"机器人辅助人工耳蜗植入电极阵列插入系统的初步外科医生经验。","authors":"Rick F Nelson, Amanda R Ernst, Oliver Adunka, S Babu, Matthew L Carlson, Alexander D Claussen, Nicholas L Deep, Bruce J Gantz, Jay A Gantz, Richard Gurgel, Robert Hong, Xiaoyang Hua, Daniel Lee, Neil Patel, Felipe Santos, Charles Yates, Marlan R Hansen","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess integration of a single-use robotic-assisted cochlear implant (RA-CI) electrode array insertion system into surgical workflows, identify potential challenges, and inform best practices.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Survey data from 16 surgeons across 10 US hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>CI candidates 12 years and older with radiographically normal cochleae.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>CI surgery with single-use RA-CI insertion system during electrode array insertion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Number of RA-CI to achieve proficiency, estimated additional time for RA-CI, and best practices to successfully incorporate the RA insertion system into CI surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 RA-CI cases were performed. All surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons (62.5%) reported they would feel comfortable using the device within five cases. Eight (50%) reported use of the RA system added 5 to 10 minutes to the case, and seven (44%) reported an added 10-15 minutes. Providing adequate incision size to secure the unit base superior to the temporal line and maximizing exposure of the facial recess were the most recommended best practices. Additional recommendations included pulling the receiver/stimulator forward within the pocket to facilitate a full electrode array insertion and considering drive head placement and mastoidectomy size to maximize overall visibility during electrode array insertion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proficiency with an RA electrode array insertion system during CI surgery can be achieved with minor adjustments to the surgical approach, within relatively few use cases (generally <5) and with minimal time addition (between 5 and 15 min). Training to specific best practices is important before initial clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"924-932"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Surgeon Experiences With a Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion System.\",\"authors\":\"Rick F Nelson, Amanda R Ernst, Oliver Adunka, S Babu, Matthew L Carlson, Alexander D Claussen, Nicholas L Deep, Bruce J Gantz, Jay A Gantz, Richard Gurgel, Robert Hong, Xiaoyang Hua, Daniel Lee, Neil Patel, Felipe Santos, Charles Yates, Marlan R Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess integration of a single-use robotic-assisted cochlear implant (RA-CI) electrode array insertion system into surgical workflows, identify potential challenges, and inform best practices.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Survey data from 16 surgeons across 10 US hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>CI candidates 12 years and older with radiographically normal cochleae.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>CI surgery with single-use RA-CI insertion system during electrode array insertion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Number of RA-CI to achieve proficiency, estimated additional time for RA-CI, and best practices to successfully incorporate the RA insertion system into CI surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 RA-CI cases were performed. All surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons (62.5%) reported they would feel comfortable using the device within five cases. Eight (50%) reported use of the RA system added 5 to 10 minutes to the case, and seven (44%) reported an added 10-15 minutes. Providing adequate incision size to secure the unit base superior to the temporal line and maximizing exposure of the facial recess were the most recommended best practices. Additional recommendations included pulling the receiver/stimulator forward within the pocket to facilitate a full electrode array insertion and considering drive head placement and mastoidectomy size to maximize overall visibility during electrode array insertion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proficiency with an RA electrode array insertion system during CI surgery can be achieved with minor adjustments to the surgical approach, within relatively few use cases (generally <5) and with minimal time addition (between 5 and 15 min). Training to specific best practices is important before initial clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"924-932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004554\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估一次性机器人辅助人工耳蜗(RA-CI)电极阵列插入系统与外科工作流程的整合,识别潜在的挑战,并告知最佳实践。研究设计:调查。背景:来自美国10家医院的16名外科医生的调查数据。患者:12岁及以上耳蜗影像学正常的CI候选人。干预措施:在电极阵列插入期间使用一次性RA-CI插入系统进行CI手术。主要结果测量:达到熟练程度的RA-CI数量,RA-CI的估计额外时间,以及成功将RA插入系统纳入CI手术的最佳实践。结果:共行RA-CI 121例。所有外科医生都完成了调查。大多数外科医生(62.5%)报告说,他们在5个病例中使用该设备感到舒服。8例(50%)报告使用RA系统使病例增加了5 - 10分钟,7例(44%)报告增加了10-15分钟。提供足够的切口大小以确保单位基底在颞线之上,并最大限度地暴露面部隐窝是最推荐的最佳做法。其他建议包括将接收器/刺激器向前拉到口袋内,以方便完整的电极阵列插入,并考虑驱动头的位置和乳突切除术的大小,以最大限度地提高电极阵列插入过程中的整体可视性。结论:在CI手术中熟练使用RA电极阵列插入系统可以通过对手术入路的轻微调整来实现,在相对较少的使用案例中(通常是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial Surgeon Experiences With a Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion System.

Objective: To assess integration of a single-use robotic-assisted cochlear implant (RA-CI) electrode array insertion system into surgical workflows, identify potential challenges, and inform best practices.

Study design: Survey.

Setting: Survey data from 16 surgeons across 10 US hospitals.

Patients: CI candidates 12 years and older with radiographically normal cochleae.

Intervention: CI surgery with single-use RA-CI insertion system during electrode array insertion.

Main outcome measures: Number of RA-CI to achieve proficiency, estimated additional time for RA-CI, and best practices to successfully incorporate the RA insertion system into CI surgery.

Results: A total of 121 RA-CI cases were performed. All surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons (62.5%) reported they would feel comfortable using the device within five cases. Eight (50%) reported use of the RA system added 5 to 10 minutes to the case, and seven (44%) reported an added 10-15 minutes. Providing adequate incision size to secure the unit base superior to the temporal line and maximizing exposure of the facial recess were the most recommended best practices. Additional recommendations included pulling the receiver/stimulator forward within the pocket to facilitate a full electrode array insertion and considering drive head placement and mastoidectomy size to maximize overall visibility during electrode array insertion.

Conclusions: Proficiency with an RA electrode array insertion system during CI surgery can be achieved with minor adjustments to the surgical approach, within relatively few use cases (generally <5) and with minimal time addition (between 5 and 15 min). Training to specific best practices is important before initial clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信