血管内治疗期间急诊转到全身麻醉与卒中结局:一项回顾性匹配研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kangda Zhang, Fa Liang, Youxuan Wu, Xinyan Wang, Xuan Hou, Zihui Zhang, Yun Yu, Yunzhen Wang, Ruquan Han
{"title":"血管内治疗期间急诊转到全身麻醉与卒中结局:一项回顾性匹配研究。","authors":"Kangda Zhang, Fa Liang, Youxuan Wu, Xinyan Wang, Xuan Hou, Zihui Zhang, Yun Yu, Yunzhen Wang, Ruquan Han","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke, conversion from non-general anesthesia (non-GA) to general anesthesia (GA) may be necessary. This study aims to evaluate the effects of intra-EVT emergency GA conversion on patient outcomes and to identify potential risk factors for such conversions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT without GA at a tertiary hospital in China. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included procedural duration, rates of successful reperfusion, discharge status, and mRS scores at 1 and 3 months. Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were utilized to control for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 418 screened patients, 215 met eligibility criteria (non-GA=172, GA conversion=43). The 3-month mRS scores were similar between GA and non-GA groups across all analyses. However, GA conversion significantly reduced the likelihood of achieving mRS scores of 0 to 3 at discharge (unmatched: OR=0.37; PSM: OR=0.29; CEM: OR=0.33) and at 90 days (unmatched: OR=0.41; PSM: OR=0.38; CEM: OR=0.36). CEM analysis indicated that GA conversion significantly increased the 1-month mortality (OR=2.76). High National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the absence of atrial fibrillation emerged as independent predictors of GA conversion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During EVT, the conversion from non-GA to GA is associated with significant hemodynamic fluctuations and may adversely affect both short-term and long-term neurological outcomes. The likelihood of GA conversion increases with higher NIHSS scores or in the absence of atrial fibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia During Endovascular Therapy and Stroke Outcomes: A Retrospective Matched Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kangda Zhang, Fa Liang, Youxuan Wu, Xinyan Wang, Xuan Hou, Zihui Zhang, Yun Yu, Yunzhen Wang, Ruquan Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke, conversion from non-general anesthesia (non-GA) to general anesthesia (GA) may be necessary. This study aims to evaluate the effects of intra-EVT emergency GA conversion on patient outcomes and to identify potential risk factors for such conversions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT without GA at a tertiary hospital in China. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included procedural duration, rates of successful reperfusion, discharge status, and mRS scores at 1 and 3 months. Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were utilized to control for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 418 screened patients, 215 met eligibility criteria (non-GA=172, GA conversion=43). The 3-month mRS scores were similar between GA and non-GA groups across all analyses. However, GA conversion significantly reduced the likelihood of achieving mRS scores of 0 to 3 at discharge (unmatched: OR=0.37; PSM: OR=0.29; CEM: OR=0.33) and at 90 days (unmatched: OR=0.41; PSM: OR=0.38; CEM: OR=0.36). CEM analysis indicated that GA conversion significantly increased the 1-month mortality (OR=2.76). High National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the absence of atrial fibrillation emerged as independent predictors of GA conversion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During EVT, the conversion from non-GA to GA is associated with significant hemodynamic fluctuations and may adversely affect both short-term and long-term neurological outcomes. The likelihood of GA conversion increases with higher NIHSS scores or in the absence of atrial fibrillation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗(EVT)中,可能需要从非全身麻醉(non-GA)转为全身麻醉(GA)。本研究旨在评估evt内急诊GA转换对患者预后的影响,并确定此类转换的潜在危险因素。方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法,对国内某三级医院行EVT的缺血性脑卒中患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要终点是90天的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分。次要结局包括手术时间、再灌注成功率、出院状态和1个月和3个月的mRS评分。采用多变量逻辑回归、倾向评分匹配(PSM)和粗化精确匹配(CEM)来控制混杂因素。结果:在418例筛查患者中,215例符合资格标准(非GA=172, GA转化=43)。在所有分析中,GA组和非GA组的3个月mRS评分相似。然而,GA转换显著降低了出院时mRS评分为0至3分的可能性(未匹配:OR=0.37;PSM:或= 0.29;CEM: OR=0.33)和90天(未匹配:OR=0.41;PSM:或= 0.38;杰姆:或者= 0.36)。CEM分析显示,GA转换显著增加1个月死亡率(OR=2.76)。美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)得分高和房颤无发成为GA转换的独立预测因子。结论:在EVT期间,从非GA到GA的转变与显著的血流动力学波动相关,并可能对短期和长期神经学预后产生不利影响。在NIHSS评分较高或无房颤的情况下,GA转换的可能性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia During Endovascular Therapy and Stroke Outcomes: A Retrospective Matched Study.

Background: In endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke, conversion from non-general anesthesia (non-GA) to general anesthesia (GA) may be necessary. This study aims to evaluate the effects of intra-EVT emergency GA conversion on patient outcomes and to identify potential risk factors for such conversions.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT without GA at a tertiary hospital in China. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included procedural duration, rates of successful reperfusion, discharge status, and mRS scores at 1 and 3 months. Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were utilized to control for confounding factors.

Results: Among 418 screened patients, 215 met eligibility criteria (non-GA=172, GA conversion=43). The 3-month mRS scores were similar between GA and non-GA groups across all analyses. However, GA conversion significantly reduced the likelihood of achieving mRS scores of 0 to 3 at discharge (unmatched: OR=0.37; PSM: OR=0.29; CEM: OR=0.33) and at 90 days (unmatched: OR=0.41; PSM: OR=0.38; CEM: OR=0.36). CEM analysis indicated that GA conversion significantly increased the 1-month mortality (OR=2.76). High National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the absence of atrial fibrillation emerged as independent predictors of GA conversion.

Conclusions: During EVT, the conversion from non-GA to GA is associated with significant hemodynamic fluctuations and may adversely affect both short-term and long-term neurological outcomes. The likelihood of GA conversion increases with higher NIHSS scores or in the absence of atrial fibrillation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信