deucravacitinib与apremilast治疗日本中重度牛皮癣患者的成本-效果分析

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2515771
Gijs van de Wetering, Hyunchung Kim, David Roberts, Yusuke Hikichi, Martina Smith, Yayoi Tada
{"title":"deucravacitinib与apremilast治疗日本中重度牛皮癣患者的成本-效果分析","authors":"Gijs van de Wetering, Hyunchung Kim, David Roberts, Yusuke Hikichi, Martina Smith, Yayoi Tada","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2515771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib <i>vs.</i> apremilast as a treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients from a Japan healthcare system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov sequence model was developed, consisting of an induction phase, maintenance phase, best supportive care and death. Clinical inputs were predominantly derived from the POETYK-PSO-1 and -2 trials (NCT03624127 and NCT03611751), and cost and resource use inputs were derived from several Japanese sources, including Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHLW) data and the outputs of a Delphi survey with Japanese clinical experts. Health-related quality of life inputs were based on the change in utility associated with different levels of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty around the base case and several scenario analyses were performed to explore structural uncertainty related to assumptions and methodological choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case, treatment with deucravacitinib results in a discounted QALY gain of 0.30 and discounted incremental costs of ¥459,771 compared to apremilast, resulting in an ICUR of ¥1,546,713 per QALY which is below the Japanese willingness to pay threshold of ¥5,000,000 per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses support the results of the base case. The latter shows that deucravacitinib has a 97.8% probability of being cost-effective compared to apremilast at the ¥5,000,000 per QALY threshold. The outcomes of all scenarios confirmed the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib compared to apremilast, with deucravacitinib being dominant in one scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deucravacitinib is cost-effective compared to apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Japan, primarily driven by improvements in health-related quality of life associated with a more favorable PASI response. This conclusion is supported by extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"922-933"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cost-effectiveness analysis of deucravacitinib <i>vs.</i> apremilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Gijs van de Wetering, Hyunchung Kim, David Roberts, Yusuke Hikichi, Martina Smith, Yayoi Tada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2515771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib <i>vs.</i> apremilast as a treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients from a Japan healthcare system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov sequence model was developed, consisting of an induction phase, maintenance phase, best supportive care and death. Clinical inputs were predominantly derived from the POETYK-PSO-1 and -2 trials (NCT03624127 and NCT03611751), and cost and resource use inputs were derived from several Japanese sources, including Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHLW) data and the outputs of a Delphi survey with Japanese clinical experts. Health-related quality of life inputs were based on the change in utility associated with different levels of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty around the base case and several scenario analyses were performed to explore structural uncertainty related to assumptions and methodological choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case, treatment with deucravacitinib results in a discounted QALY gain of 0.30 and discounted incremental costs of ¥459,771 compared to apremilast, resulting in an ICUR of ¥1,546,713 per QALY which is below the Japanese willingness to pay threshold of ¥5,000,000 per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses support the results of the base case. The latter shows that deucravacitinib has a 97.8% probability of being cost-effective compared to apremilast at the ¥5,000,000 per QALY threshold. The outcomes of all scenarios confirmed the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib compared to apremilast, with deucravacitinib being dominant in one scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deucravacitinib is cost-effective compared to apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Japan, primarily driven by improvements in health-related quality of life associated with a more favorable PASI response. This conclusion is supported by extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"922-933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2515771\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2515771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在从日本医疗保健系统的角度评估deucravacitinib与apremilast治疗中重度牛皮癣患者的成本效益。方法:建立一个马尔可夫序列模型,包括诱导期、维持期、最佳支持护理期和死亡期。临床输入主要来自POETYK-PSO-1和-2试验(NCT03624127和NCT03611751),成本和资源使用输入来自几个日本来源,包括卫生和福利部(MHLW)数据和与日本临床专家进行的德尔福调查的结果。与健康相关的生活质量输入基于与不同水平的银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)反应相关的效用变化。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析,以解释基本情况周围的不确定性,并进行了几种情景分析,以探索与假设和方法选择相关的结构不确定性。结果:在基本情况下,与阿普雷米司特相比,deucravacitinib治疗的QALY折扣收益为0.30,折扣增量成本为459,771日元,导致每个QALY的ICUR为1,546,713日元,低于日本人愿意支付的门槛,每个QALY为5,000,000日元。确定性和概率敏感性分析支持基本情况的结果。后者表明,在每个QALY阈值为500万日元时,deucravacitinib与apremilast相比具有97.8%的成本效益概率。所有情况的结果都证实了与阿普雷米司特相比,deucravacitinib的成本-效果,在一个情况下,deucravacitinib占主导地位。结论:在日本,与阿普雷米司特相比,Deucravacitinib在中重度斑块型银屑病患者中具有成本效益,主要是由于与更有利的PASI反应相关的健康相关生活质量的改善。这一结论得到了广泛的敏感性和情景分析的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cost-effectiveness analysis of deucravacitinib vs. apremilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients in Japan.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib vs. apremilast as a treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients from a Japan healthcare system perspective.

Methods: A Markov sequence model was developed, consisting of an induction phase, maintenance phase, best supportive care and death. Clinical inputs were predominantly derived from the POETYK-PSO-1 and -2 trials (NCT03624127 and NCT03611751), and cost and resource use inputs were derived from several Japanese sources, including Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHLW) data and the outputs of a Delphi survey with Japanese clinical experts. Health-related quality of life inputs were based on the change in utility associated with different levels of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty around the base case and several scenario analyses were performed to explore structural uncertainty related to assumptions and methodological choices.

Results: In the base case, treatment with deucravacitinib results in a discounted QALY gain of 0.30 and discounted incremental costs of ¥459,771 compared to apremilast, resulting in an ICUR of ¥1,546,713 per QALY which is below the Japanese willingness to pay threshold of ¥5,000,000 per QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses support the results of the base case. The latter shows that deucravacitinib has a 97.8% probability of being cost-effective compared to apremilast at the ¥5,000,000 per QALY threshold. The outcomes of all scenarios confirmed the cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib compared to apremilast, with deucravacitinib being dominant in one scenario.

Conclusions: Deucravacitinib is cost-effective compared to apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Japan, primarily driven by improvements in health-related quality of life associated with a more favorable PASI response. This conclusion is supported by extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信