玉米品种间光合效率的变异及其对育种策略的影响。

IF 5.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Qiu-Yan Yang, Yu-Wen Zhang, Ning-Yu Liu, Hu Sun, Shi-Bao Zhang, Stefan Timm, Wei Huang
{"title":"玉米品种间光合效率的变异及其对育种策略的影响。","authors":"Qiu-Yan Yang, Yu-Wen Zhang, Ning-Yu Liu, Hu Sun, Shi-Bao Zhang, Stefan Timm, Wei Huang","doi":"10.1093/jxb/eraf249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maize is one of the most important crops worldwide. Exploring the factors affecting photosynthetic efficiency alongside with the genetic variability within cultivars is fundamental to breed for high-yield maize. Despite its importance, there is limited knowledge about the variation in steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic efficiency among maize cultivars. Here, we investigated the anatomical and physiological mechanisms that contribute to the variability in photosynthetic CO2 assimilation under both, steady-state and fluctuating light conditions, respectively, in 12 high-yielding, farm-preferred maize cultivars. Under steady-state conditions, the saturating CO2 assimilation rate (Asat) varied from 50.2 to 63.1 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1. This variation was tightly related to the area ratio of mesophyll cells to bundle sheath cells, pointing out the role of leaf anatomy in determining Asat of maize. During the initial 5 minutes of light induction, we recorded a considerable range of cumulative CO2 fixation from 9.02 to 13.1 mmol m-2, with the loss of potential CO2 uptake (Closs) varying from 23% to 47% among the cultivars. This variation in Closs was primarily attributed to the kinetics of gs, which were significantly correlated to the expression of the ethylene synthesis genes ACS1 and GAD1, rather than stomatal density. Taking together, we discovered a greater degree of variation in dynamic photosynthetic efficiency compared to steady-state efficiency among the studied maize cultivars. This finding highlights the potential of manipulating gs kinetics as a valuable breeding target to enhance photosynthetic efficiency and yield in maize.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in photosynthetic efficiency among maize cultivars and its implications for breeding strategy.\",\"authors\":\"Qiu-Yan Yang, Yu-Wen Zhang, Ning-Yu Liu, Hu Sun, Shi-Bao Zhang, Stefan Timm, Wei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jxb/eraf249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maize is one of the most important crops worldwide. Exploring the factors affecting photosynthetic efficiency alongside with the genetic variability within cultivars is fundamental to breed for high-yield maize. Despite its importance, there is limited knowledge about the variation in steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic efficiency among maize cultivars. Here, we investigated the anatomical and physiological mechanisms that contribute to the variability in photosynthetic CO2 assimilation under both, steady-state and fluctuating light conditions, respectively, in 12 high-yielding, farm-preferred maize cultivars. Under steady-state conditions, the saturating CO2 assimilation rate (Asat) varied from 50.2 to 63.1 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1. This variation was tightly related to the area ratio of mesophyll cells to bundle sheath cells, pointing out the role of leaf anatomy in determining Asat of maize. During the initial 5 minutes of light induction, we recorded a considerable range of cumulative CO2 fixation from 9.02 to 13.1 mmol m-2, with the loss of potential CO2 uptake (Closs) varying from 23% to 47% among the cultivars. This variation in Closs was primarily attributed to the kinetics of gs, which were significantly correlated to the expression of the ethylene synthesis genes ACS1 and GAD1, rather than stomatal density. Taking together, we discovered a greater degree of variation in dynamic photosynthetic efficiency compared to steady-state efficiency among the studied maize cultivars. This finding highlights the potential of manipulating gs kinetics as a valuable breeding target to enhance photosynthetic efficiency and yield in maize.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Botany\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf249\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玉米是世界上最重要的作物之一。探究影响玉米光合效率的因素以及品种间的遗传变异是玉米高产育种的基础。尽管它很重要,但对玉米品种间稳态和动态光合效率的变化了解有限。在此,我们研究了12个高产玉米品种在稳态和波动光条件下光合CO2同化变化的解剖和生理机制。稳态条件下,饱和CO2同化率(Asat)为50.2 ~ 63.1µmol CO2 m-2 s-1。这种变异与叶肉细胞与束鞘细胞的面积比密切相关,说明叶片解剖结构在决定玉米Asat中的作用。在最初的5分钟光诱导中,我们记录了相当大的累积CO2固定范围,从9.02到13.1 mmol m-2,潜在CO2吸收损失(Closs)在不同品种之间从23%到47%不等。Closs的变化主要归因于gs的动力学,而gs与乙烯合成基因ACS1和GAD1的表达显著相关,而与气孔密度无关。综上所述,我们发现在所研究的玉米品种中,动态光合效率与稳态效率相比有更大程度的差异。这一发现强调了操纵gs动力学作为提高玉米光合效率和产量的有价值的育种目标的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in photosynthetic efficiency among maize cultivars and its implications for breeding strategy.

Maize is one of the most important crops worldwide. Exploring the factors affecting photosynthetic efficiency alongside with the genetic variability within cultivars is fundamental to breed for high-yield maize. Despite its importance, there is limited knowledge about the variation in steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic efficiency among maize cultivars. Here, we investigated the anatomical and physiological mechanisms that contribute to the variability in photosynthetic CO2 assimilation under both, steady-state and fluctuating light conditions, respectively, in 12 high-yielding, farm-preferred maize cultivars. Under steady-state conditions, the saturating CO2 assimilation rate (Asat) varied from 50.2 to 63.1 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1. This variation was tightly related to the area ratio of mesophyll cells to bundle sheath cells, pointing out the role of leaf anatomy in determining Asat of maize. During the initial 5 minutes of light induction, we recorded a considerable range of cumulative CO2 fixation from 9.02 to 13.1 mmol m-2, with the loss of potential CO2 uptake (Closs) varying from 23% to 47% among the cultivars. This variation in Closs was primarily attributed to the kinetics of gs, which were significantly correlated to the expression of the ethylene synthesis genes ACS1 and GAD1, rather than stomatal density. Taking together, we discovered a greater degree of variation in dynamic photosynthetic efficiency compared to steady-state efficiency among the studied maize cultivars. This finding highlights the potential of manipulating gs kinetics as a valuable breeding target to enhance photosynthetic efficiency and yield in maize.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Botany
Journal of Experimental Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
450
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology. Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信