术前盆腔磁共振成像的解剖测量能否预测钬激光前列腺摘除术后尿失禁?

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1089/end.2025.0006
Shayan Smani, Amir I Khan, Ankur U Choksi, Benjamin H Press, Syed N Rahman, Christopher S Hayden, Mursal Gardezi, Michael Jalfon, Jason Lee, Preston C Sprenkle, Daniel S Kellner
{"title":"术前盆腔磁共振成像的解剖测量能否预测钬激光前列腺摘除术后尿失禁?","authors":"Shayan Smani, Amir I Khan, Ankur U Choksi, Benjamin H Press, Syed N Rahman, Christopher S Hayden, Mursal Gardezi, Michael Jalfon, Jason Lee, Preston C Sprenkle, Daniel S Kellner","doi":"10.1089/end.2025.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background and Objective:</i></b> Anatomical dimensions of the prostate and membranous urethra are well-established predictors of urinary incontinence following robotic prostatectomy. However, their role in predicting incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative anatomical measurements, including membranous urethral length (MUL), membranous urethral angle (MUA), levator ani thickness (LAT), and intravesical prostatic protrusion length (IPPL), in assessing the risk of early postoperative urinary incontinence following HoLEP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed 122 patients who underwent HoLEP from April 2019 to June 2022 with preoperative MRI imaging. Anatomical features including coronal and sagittal MUL, MUA, LAT, and IPPL were assessed. Urinary incontinence, defined as the use of ≥1 pad per day, was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. All logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, body mass index, postvoid residual, preoperative incontinence, and prostate-specific antigen, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the discriminatory utility of MRI anatomical measurements. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Increasing MUL was significantly associated with reduced incontinence risk at 1 month (coronal MUL: odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.01; sagittal MUL: OR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.046). No significant associations were found for MUA, LAT, or IPPL. ROC analysis of averaged coronal and sagittal MUL revealed moderate discriminatory power (area under the curve: 0.644), with a threshold of 14 mm identified via the Youden index. Individuals with an MUL <14 mm were at nearly 4-fold increased odds of incontinence at 1 month (OR 3.835, 95% CI: 1.516-9.703, <i>p</i> = 0.005). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Preoperative MUL measurement provides a practical, imaging-based method to predict early postoperative urinary incontinence following HoLEP. Incorporating MUL into preoperative evaluations may improve risk stratification, optimize patient counseling, and guide perioperative management strategies. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"731-737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Anatomical Measurements on Preoperative Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Postoperative Urinary Incontinence after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate?\",\"authors\":\"Shayan Smani, Amir I Khan, Ankur U Choksi, Benjamin H Press, Syed N Rahman, Christopher S Hayden, Mursal Gardezi, Michael Jalfon, Jason Lee, Preston C Sprenkle, Daniel S Kellner\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2025.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background and Objective:</i></b> Anatomical dimensions of the prostate and membranous urethra are well-established predictors of urinary incontinence following robotic prostatectomy. However, their role in predicting incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative anatomical measurements, including membranous urethral length (MUL), membranous urethral angle (MUA), levator ani thickness (LAT), and intravesical prostatic protrusion length (IPPL), in assessing the risk of early postoperative urinary incontinence following HoLEP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed 122 patients who underwent HoLEP from April 2019 to June 2022 with preoperative MRI imaging. Anatomical features including coronal and sagittal MUL, MUA, LAT, and IPPL were assessed. Urinary incontinence, defined as the use of ≥1 pad per day, was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. All logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, body mass index, postvoid residual, preoperative incontinence, and prostate-specific antigen, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the discriminatory utility of MRI anatomical measurements. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Increasing MUL was significantly associated with reduced incontinence risk at 1 month (coronal MUL: odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.01; sagittal MUL: OR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.046). No significant associations were found for MUA, LAT, or IPPL. ROC analysis of averaged coronal and sagittal MUL revealed moderate discriminatory power (area under the curve: 0.644), with a threshold of 14 mm identified via the Youden index. Individuals with an MUL <14 mm were at nearly 4-fold increased odds of incontinence at 1 month (OR 3.835, 95% CI: 1.516-9.703, <i>p</i> = 0.005). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Preoperative MUL measurement provides a practical, imaging-based method to predict early postoperative urinary incontinence following HoLEP. Incorporating MUL into preoperative evaluations may improve risk stratification, optimize patient counseling, and guide perioperative management strategies. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"731-737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:前列腺和膜性尿道的解剖尺寸是机器人前列腺切除术后尿失禁的预测因素。然而,它们在预测钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)后尿失禁中的作用仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估术前解剖测量,包括膜性尿道长度(MUL)、膜性尿道角(MUA)、提肛肌厚度(LAT)和膀胱内前列腺突出物长度(IPPL)对HoLEP术后早期尿失禁风险的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2019年4月至2022年6月接受HoLEP手术的122例患者的术前MRI成像。解剖特征包括冠状和矢状MUL、MUA、LAT和IPPL。尿失禁,定义为每天使用≥1个尿垫,在术后1、3和6个月进行评估。所有的logistic回归分析都校正了年龄、体重指数、空隙后残留、术前失禁和前列腺特异性抗原,并构建了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来评估MRI解剖测量的歧视性效用。结果:MUL增加与1个月时尿失禁风险降低显著相关(冠状MUL:优势比[OR], 0.85;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.75-0.96;P = 0.01;矢状位MUL: OR, 0.89;95% ci: 0.79-0.99;P = 0.046)。未发现MUA、LAT或IPPL有显著相关性。平均冠状面和矢状面MUL的ROC分析显示,判别能力中等(曲线下面积:0.644),通过约登指数确定阈值为14 mm。MUL个体p = 0.005)。结论:术前MUL测量为预测HoLEP术后早期尿失禁提供了一种实用的、基于成像的方法。将MUL纳入术前评估可以改善风险分层,优化患者咨询,指导围手术期管理策略。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Anatomical Measurements on Preoperative Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Postoperative Urinary Incontinence after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate?

Background and Objective: Anatomical dimensions of the prostate and membranous urethra are well-established predictors of urinary incontinence following robotic prostatectomy. However, their role in predicting incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative anatomical measurements, including membranous urethral length (MUL), membranous urethral angle (MUA), levator ani thickness (LAT), and intravesical prostatic protrusion length (IPPL), in assessing the risk of early postoperative urinary incontinence following HoLEP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 122 patients who underwent HoLEP from April 2019 to June 2022 with preoperative MRI imaging. Anatomical features including coronal and sagittal MUL, MUA, LAT, and IPPL were assessed. Urinary incontinence, defined as the use of ≥1 pad per day, was evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. All logistic regression analyses were adjusted for age, body mass index, postvoid residual, preoperative incontinence, and prostate-specific antigen, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the discriminatory utility of MRI anatomical measurements. Results: Increasing MUL was significantly associated with reduced incontinence risk at 1 month (coronal MUL: odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96; p = 0.01; sagittal MUL: OR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99; p = 0.046). No significant associations were found for MUA, LAT, or IPPL. ROC analysis of averaged coronal and sagittal MUL revealed moderate discriminatory power (area under the curve: 0.644), with a threshold of 14 mm identified via the Youden index. Individuals with an MUL <14 mm were at nearly 4-fold increased odds of incontinence at 1 month (OR 3.835, 95% CI: 1.516-9.703, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Preoperative MUL measurement provides a practical, imaging-based method to predict early postoperative urinary incontinence following HoLEP. Incorporating MUL into preoperative evaluations may improve risk stratification, optimize patient counseling, and guide perioperative management strategies. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信