Jiajia Zhang, Gang Zhou, Meipan Yin, Yishu Ma, Wei He, Yonghua Bi, Gang Wu
{"title":"经导管动脉灌注化疗联合脂醇化疗栓塞治疗晚期胃底贲门癌合并梗阻。","authors":"Jiajia Zhang, Gang Zhou, Meipan Yin, Yishu Ma, Wei He, Yonghua Bi, Gang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06169-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gastric fundus and cardia cancer are increasingly common, diagnosed at a late stage, often with severe obstruction, and have a poor prognosis. Transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is rarely used for gastric cancer. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) combined with TACE in advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction and compare it to bland embolization (BE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical efficacy of TAI-TACE was evaluated through technical and clinical success rates, obstruction relief, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and postoperative adverse events. TAI-TACE and TAI-BE efficacies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 53 patients (age 70.0 ± 11.1 years, 38 males). Thirty-two patients underwent TAI-TACE, and 21 underwent TAI-BE. The cohort's technical success rate was 100%. The pre- and post-intervention median Stooler grades were 4 and 2 in the TAI-TACE group and 3 and 3 in the TAI-BE group, respectively. Compared to the TAI-BE group, the TAI-TACE group had a higher clinical success rate (78.1%, 25/32 vs. 42.9%, 9/21; P = 0.009), a better objective response rate (53.1% vs. 38.1%; P = 0.016), and a longer median OS (13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-22.8 vs. 10.0; 95% CI, 8.5-11.5; P = 0.039) months. All adverse events were grade 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TAI-TACE interventional therapy scheme was safe and effective, achieving rapid tumor shrinkage, obstructive symptom alleviation, improved quality of life, and a significantly better overall effect than TAI-BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 6","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lipiodol chemoembolization for advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Jiajia Zhang, Gang Zhou, Meipan Yin, Yishu Ma, Wei He, Yonghua Bi, Gang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06169-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gastric fundus and cardia cancer are increasingly common, diagnosed at a late stage, often with severe obstruction, and have a poor prognosis. Transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is rarely used for gastric cancer. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) combined with TACE in advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction and compare it to bland embolization (BE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical efficacy of TAI-TACE was evaluated through technical and clinical success rates, obstruction relief, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and postoperative adverse events. TAI-TACE and TAI-BE efficacies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 53 patients (age 70.0 ± 11.1 years, 38 males). Thirty-two patients underwent TAI-TACE, and 21 underwent TAI-BE. The cohort's technical success rate was 100%. The pre- and post-intervention median Stooler grades were 4 and 2 in the TAI-TACE group and 3 and 3 in the TAI-BE group, respectively. Compared to the TAI-BE group, the TAI-TACE group had a higher clinical success rate (78.1%, 25/32 vs. 42.9%, 9/21; P = 0.009), a better objective response rate (53.1% vs. 38.1%; P = 0.016), and a longer median OS (13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-22.8 vs. 10.0; 95% CI, 8.5-11.5; P = 0.039) months. All adverse events were grade 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TAI-TACE interventional therapy scheme was safe and effective, achieving rapid tumor shrinkage, obstructive symptom alleviation, improved quality of life, and a significantly better overall effect than TAI-BE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 6\",\"pages\":\"183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06169-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06169-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:胃底贲门癌越来越常见,诊断较晚,常伴有严重梗阻,预后较差。经导管动脉脂醇化学栓塞术(TACE)很少用于胃癌。本单中心回顾性研究旨在分析经导管动脉灌注化疗(TAI)联合TACE治疗晚期胃底贲门癌合并梗阻的疗效和安全性,并与温和栓塞(BE)进行比较。材料和方法:通过技术和临床成功率、阻塞缓解、肿瘤反应、总生存期(OS)和术后不良事件评价TAI-TACE的临床疗效。比较TAI-TACE和TAI-BE的疗效。结果:纳入53例患者(年龄70.0±11.1岁,男性38例)。32例患者行TAI-TACE, 21例行TAI-BE。该队列的技术成功率为100%。干预前和干预后的Stooler评分中位数在TAI-TACE组分别为4和2,在TAI-BE组分别为3和3。与TAI-BE组相比,TAI-TACE组的临床成功率更高(78.1%,25/32 vs 42.9%, 9/21;P = 0.009),客观有效率更高(53.1% vs. 38.1%;P = 0.016),中位OS较长(13.0;95%置信区间(CI), 3.2 ~ 22.8 vs. 10.0;95% ci, 8.5-11.5;P = 0.039)个月。所有不良事件均为1级。结论:TAI-TACE介入治疗方案安全有效,肿瘤迅速缩小,梗阻症状缓解,生活质量提高,整体效果明显优于TAI-BE。
Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lipiodol chemoembolization for advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction.
Purpose: Gastric fundus and cardia cancer are increasingly common, diagnosed at a late stage, often with severe obstruction, and have a poor prognosis. Transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is rarely used for gastric cancer. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) combined with TACE in advanced gastric fundus and cardia cancer with obstruction and compare it to bland embolization (BE).
Materials and methods: The clinical efficacy of TAI-TACE was evaluated through technical and clinical success rates, obstruction relief, tumor response, overall survival (OS), and postoperative adverse events. TAI-TACE and TAI-BE efficacies were compared.
Results: The study included 53 patients (age 70.0 ± 11.1 years, 38 males). Thirty-two patients underwent TAI-TACE, and 21 underwent TAI-BE. The cohort's technical success rate was 100%. The pre- and post-intervention median Stooler grades were 4 and 2 in the TAI-TACE group and 3 and 3 in the TAI-BE group, respectively. Compared to the TAI-BE group, the TAI-TACE group had a higher clinical success rate (78.1%, 25/32 vs. 42.9%, 9/21; P = 0.009), a better objective response rate (53.1% vs. 38.1%; P = 0.016), and a longer median OS (13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-22.8 vs. 10.0; 95% CI, 8.5-11.5; P = 0.039) months. All adverse events were grade 1.
Conclusion: The TAI-TACE interventional therapy scheme was safe and effective, achieving rapid tumor shrinkage, obstructive symptom alleviation, improved quality of life, and a significantly better overall effect than TAI-BE.
期刊介绍:
The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses.
The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.