统一脱机成功标准以弥合体外膜氧合间隙:基于成功脱机定义的决定因素的变化。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hibiki Serizawa, Ginga Suzuki, Saria Nishioka, Toshimitsu Kobori, Yuka Masuyama, Saki Yamamoto, Yoshimi Nakamichi, Mitsuru Honda, Yosuke Sasaki
{"title":"统一脱机成功标准以弥合体外膜氧合间隙:基于成功脱机定义的决定因素的变化。","authors":"Hibiki Serizawa, Ginga Suzuki, Saria Nishioka, Toshimitsu Kobori, Yuka Masuyama, Saki Yamamoto, Yoshimi Nakamichi, Mitsuru Honda, Yosuke Sasaki","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors contributing to the \"ECMO gap,\" the discrepancy between successful weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and survival to hospital discharge, using different definitions of successful weaning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary academic medical center intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VA-ECMO between January 2018 and June 2023. Patients who died while on ECMO were excluded. Successful weaning from ECMO was defined using two criteria: survival for 48 hours (Definition 1) and independence from mechanical circulatory support (MCS) within 30 days (Definition 2).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the ECMO gap for each definition, with Bayesian logistic regression conducted as a sensitivity analysis. Of the 130 ECMO patients, 110 were included in the analysis. Acute myocardial infarction and sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock (SICS) were associated with the ECMO gap under Definition 1. Under Definition 2, age (p = 0.04) was significantly associated with the ECMO gap,\" while SICS showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.06). Bayesian analysis supported the association between age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.08 [0.01-0.16]) and the ECMO gap. SICS showed a possible association (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.15 [0.26-6.33]); however, the wide credible interval suggests caution in interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factors associated with the ECMO gap vary depending on the definition of successful weaning from ECMO. Specifically, advanced age and sepsis (eg, SICS) may hinder long-term recovery and contribute to the ECMO gap. Standardizing the definition of successful ECMO weaning is essential to improving patient outcomes and refining treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unifying Weaning Success Criteria to Bridge the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Gap: Variations in Determinants Based on Definitions of Successful Weaning.\",\"authors\":\"Hibiki Serizawa, Ginga Suzuki, Saria Nishioka, Toshimitsu Kobori, Yuka Masuyama, Saki Yamamoto, Yoshimi Nakamichi, Mitsuru Honda, Yosuke Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors contributing to the \\\"ECMO gap,\\\" the discrepancy between successful weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and survival to hospital discharge, using different definitions of successful weaning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary academic medical center intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VA-ECMO between January 2018 and June 2023. Patients who died while on ECMO were excluded. Successful weaning from ECMO was defined using two criteria: survival for 48 hours (Definition 1) and independence from mechanical circulatory support (MCS) within 30 days (Definition 2).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the ECMO gap for each definition, with Bayesian logistic regression conducted as a sensitivity analysis. Of the 130 ECMO patients, 110 were included in the analysis. Acute myocardial infarction and sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock (SICS) were associated with the ECMO gap under Definition 1. Under Definition 2, age (p = 0.04) was significantly associated with the ECMO gap,\\\" while SICS showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.06). Bayesian analysis supported the association between age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.08 [0.01-0.16]) and the ECMO gap. SICS showed a possible association (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.15 [0.26-6.33]); however, the wide credible interval suggests caution in interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factors associated with the ECMO gap vary depending on the definition of successful weaning from ECMO. Specifically, advanced age and sepsis (eg, SICS) may hinder long-term recovery and contribute to the ECMO gap. Standardizing the definition of successful ECMO weaning is essential to improving patient outcomes and refining treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响“ECMO间隙”的因素,即在不同的成功脱机定义下,成功脱离静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)与存活至出院之间的差异。设计:单中心回顾性观察研究。环境:三级学术医疗中心重症监护室。参与者:2018年1月至2023年6月期间接受VA-ECMO的年龄≥18岁的患者。排除在ECMO期间死亡的患者。ECMO成功脱机的定义有两个标准:存活48小时(定义1)和30天内脱离机械循环支持(MCS)(定义2)。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:对每个定义进行多变量logistic回归分析,以确定与ECMO间隙相关的因素,并进行贝叶斯logistic回归作为敏感性分析。在130例ECMO患者中,110例纳入分析。根据定义1,急性心肌梗死和脓毒症诱发的心源性休克(SICS)与ECMO间隙相关。在定义2中,年龄(p = 0.04)与ECMO间隙显著相关,而SICS则呈现显著趋势(p = 0.06)。贝叶斯分析支持年龄(优势比[95%可信区间]:0.08[0.01-0.16])与ECMO间隙之间的关联。SICS显示可能存在关联(优势比[95%置信区间]:3.15 [0.26-6.33]);然而,较宽的可信区间表明在解释时要谨慎。结论:与ECMO间隙相关的因素取决于ECMO成功脱机的定义。具体来说,高龄和败血症(例如,SICS)可能会阻碍长期恢复并导致ECMO缺口。标准化ECMO成功脱机的定义对于改善患者预后和完善治疗策略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unifying Weaning Success Criteria to Bridge the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Gap: Variations in Determinants Based on Definitions of Successful Weaning.

Objective: To investigate the factors contributing to the "ECMO gap," the discrepancy between successful weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and survival to hospital discharge, using different definitions of successful weaning.

Design: Single-center retrospective observational study.

Setting: A tertiary academic medical center intensive care unit.

Participants: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VA-ECMO between January 2018 and June 2023. Patients who died while on ECMO were excluded. Successful weaning from ECMO was defined using two criteria: survival for 48 hours (Definition 1) and independence from mechanical circulatory support (MCS) within 30 days (Definition 2).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the ECMO gap for each definition, with Bayesian logistic regression conducted as a sensitivity analysis. Of the 130 ECMO patients, 110 were included in the analysis. Acute myocardial infarction and sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock (SICS) were associated with the ECMO gap under Definition 1. Under Definition 2, age (p = 0.04) was significantly associated with the ECMO gap," while SICS showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.06). Bayesian analysis supported the association between age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.08 [0.01-0.16]) and the ECMO gap. SICS showed a possible association (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.15 [0.26-6.33]); however, the wide credible interval suggests caution in interpretation.

Conclusions: The factors associated with the ECMO gap vary depending on the definition of successful weaning from ECMO. Specifically, advanced age and sepsis (eg, SICS) may hinder long-term recovery and contribute to the ECMO gap. Standardizing the definition of successful ECMO weaning is essential to improving patient outcomes and refining treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信