颈总动脉闭塞后7F Optimo球囊导管置入颈动脉支架期间内动脉顺行血流的预测因素

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Kei Harada, Kei Arakawa, Masahito Kajihara
{"title":"颈总动脉闭塞后7F Optimo球囊导管置入颈动脉支架期间内动脉顺行血流的预测因素","authors":"Kei Harada, Kei Arakawa, Masahito Kajihara","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the 7F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) allows for smooth navigation and facilitates proximal flow control. However, this method may allow antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA). This study aims to identify predictors of antegrade flow during CAS with the common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 102 lesions treated with CAS using the 7F Optimo BGC and distal filter protection. The ICA flow pattern was assessed via contrast injection during CCA occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antegrade flow in the ICA was observed in 22 lesions (22%). Compared with lesions where ICA flow control (stagnation or reverse flow) was achieved, the external carotid artery (ECA) diameter was significantly larger (4.4 ± 0.7 mm vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001), and the minimum lesion diameter was significantly larger (3.2 ± 1.2 mm vs. 2.1 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.44-16.1; p = 0.01) and an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.08-9.09; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of antegrade flow. High-intensity spots in postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and the incidence of ischemic events were not significantly different between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lesions with a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm or an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm may exhibit antegrade ICA flow with BGC regardless of CCA occlusion, suggesting that an additional distal filter may help reduce embolic risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Antegrade Flow in the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Artery Stenting with a 7F Optimo Balloon Guide Catheter Following Common Carotid Artery Occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Kei Harada, Kei Arakawa, Masahito Kajihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the 7F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) allows for smooth navigation and facilitates proximal flow control. However, this method may allow antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA). This study aims to identify predictors of antegrade flow during CAS with the common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 102 lesions treated with CAS using the 7F Optimo BGC and distal filter protection. The ICA flow pattern was assessed via contrast injection during CCA occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antegrade flow in the ICA was observed in 22 lesions (22%). Compared with lesions where ICA flow control (stagnation or reverse flow) was achieved, the external carotid artery (ECA) diameter was significantly larger (4.4 ± 0.7 mm vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001), and the minimum lesion diameter was significantly larger (3.2 ± 1.2 mm vs. 2.1 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.44-16.1; p = 0.01) and an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.08-9.09; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of antegrade flow. High-intensity spots in postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and the incidence of ischemic events were not significantly different between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lesions with a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm or an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm may exhibit antegrade ICA flow with BGC regardless of CCA occlusion, suggesting that an additional distal filter may help reduce embolic risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)使用7F Optimo球囊导尿管(BGC)可以平滑导航并促进近端血流控制。然而,这种方法可能会导致颈内动脉(ICA)的顺行血流。本研究旨在确定颈总动脉(CCA)闭塞的CAS中顺行血流的预测因素。方法:回顾性分析采用7F Optimo BGC和远端过滤器保护的CAS治疗的102例病变。在CCA闭塞期间通过注射造影剂评估ICA血流模式。结果:22个病变(22%)出现ICA顺行血流。与病变相比,ICA流控制(停滞或逆流),颈外动脉(ECA)直径明显增大(4.4  毫米和3.6±0.7  ±1.2毫米,p 结论:最小损伤病变直径≥2.1  mm或ECA直径≥4.2  mm可能出现广泛性、ICA流与BGC不管CCA闭塞,表明额外的远端滤波器可能有助于减少栓塞的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of Antegrade Flow in the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Artery Stenting with a 7F Optimo Balloon Guide Catheter Following Common Carotid Artery Occlusion.

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the 7F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) allows for smooth navigation and facilitates proximal flow control. However, this method may allow antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA). This study aims to identify predictors of antegrade flow during CAS with the common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 102 lesions treated with CAS using the 7F Optimo BGC and distal filter protection. The ICA flow pattern was assessed via contrast injection during CCA occlusion.

Results: Antegrade flow in the ICA was observed in 22 lesions (22%). Compared with lesions where ICA flow control (stagnation or reverse flow) was achieved, the external carotid artery (ECA) diameter was significantly larger (4.4 ± 0.7 mm vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001), and the minimum lesion diameter was significantly larger (3.2 ± 1.2 mm vs. 2.1 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.44-16.1; p = 0.01) and an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.08-9.09; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of antegrade flow. High-intensity spots in postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and the incidence of ischemic events were not significantly different between both groups.

Conclusions: Lesions with a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm or an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm may exhibit antegrade ICA flow with BGC regardless of CCA occlusion, suggesting that an additional distal filter may help reduce embolic risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信