中国国家重点保护野生植物保护缺口评估:来自县级分布数据的洞察。

IF 4.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Xiaotian Pan, Zhangjian Shan, Xin Tian, Yanting Niu, Yun Liu, Zhe Li, Yutong Li, Yuxi Huang, Jianfei Ye
{"title":"中国国家重点保护野生植物保护缺口评估:来自县级分布数据的洞察。","authors":"Xiaotian Pan, Zhangjian Shan, Xin Tian, Yanting Niu, Yun Liu, Zhe Li, Yutong Li, Yuxi Huang, Jianfei Ye","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02270-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Key Protected Wild Plants (NKPWPs) list serves as China's primary legal framework for plant diversity protection, with the species categorized into Level I (critically endangered, strictly protected) and Level II (lower risk but still requiring protection). However, the geographical distribution of these species and gaps in their conservation remain elusive due to the limited availability of data on species distribution. Thus, to address these gaps and support precise conservation, we developed a county-level distribution database for the NKPWP species using information primarily sourced from literature. Using this database, we elucidated the geographical distribution patterns of NKPWPs and identified the gaps in both in situ and ex situ conservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NKPWPs analyzed in the study included 1,128 plant species. We compiled a county-level distribution database for these species with 30,397 records. Detailed analysis of this data revealed that these species were concentrated in the mountainous regions of southern China, including the Eastern Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains, south Yunnan, the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi border, and the Wuling Mountains. Among the 1,118 embryophyte species of the checklist, 1,060 (94.81%) were found conserved in situ, 681 (60.91%) were found conserved ex situ, and 660 (59.03%) through both approaches. Besides, species with a higher threat level and limited distribution range exhibited lower conservation coverage in both ex situ and in situ approaches; 37 species received no conservation (3.31%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The county-level distribution database developed in this study comprehensively depicts the geographical distribution patterns of NKPWP in China, offering valuable data for planning species conservation and providing a foundational framework for addressing the existing gaps in their conservation across China. This database will ultimately support targeted conservation and resource allocation to protect plant diversity effectively. We also suggest adopting an integrated evaluation approach for conservation strategies in other areas, globally, or for other biological groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating conservation gaps of China's national key protected wild plants: insights from county-level distribution data.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaotian Pan, Zhangjian Shan, Xin Tian, Yanting Niu, Yun Liu, Zhe Li, Yutong Li, Yuxi Huang, Jianfei Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12915-025-02270-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Key Protected Wild Plants (NKPWPs) list serves as China's primary legal framework for plant diversity protection, with the species categorized into Level I (critically endangered, strictly protected) and Level II (lower risk but still requiring protection). However, the geographical distribution of these species and gaps in their conservation remain elusive due to the limited availability of data on species distribution. Thus, to address these gaps and support precise conservation, we developed a county-level distribution database for the NKPWP species using information primarily sourced from literature. Using this database, we elucidated the geographical distribution patterns of NKPWPs and identified the gaps in both in situ and ex situ conservation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NKPWPs analyzed in the study included 1,128 plant species. We compiled a county-level distribution database for these species with 30,397 records. Detailed analysis of this data revealed that these species were concentrated in the mountainous regions of southern China, including the Eastern Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains, south Yunnan, the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi border, and the Wuling Mountains. Among the 1,118 embryophyte species of the checklist, 1,060 (94.81%) were found conserved in situ, 681 (60.91%) were found conserved ex situ, and 660 (59.03%) through both approaches. Besides, species with a higher threat level and limited distribution range exhibited lower conservation coverage in both ex situ and in situ approaches; 37 species received no conservation (3.31%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The county-level distribution database developed in this study comprehensively depicts the geographical distribution patterns of NKPWP in China, offering valuable data for planning species conservation and providing a foundational framework for addressing the existing gaps in their conservation across China. This database will ultimately support targeted conservation and resource allocation to protect plant diversity effectively. We also suggest adopting an integrated evaluation approach for conservation strategies in other areas, globally, or for other biological groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Biology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02270-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02270-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国家重点保护野生植物名录是中国植物多样性保护的主要法律框架,将植物分为一级(极度濒危,受到严格保护)和二级(风险较低,但仍需要保护)。然而,由于物种分布数据有限,这些物种的地理分布和保护差距仍然难以捉摸。因此,为了解决这些差距并支持精确的保护,我们利用主要来自文献的信息开发了NKPWP物种的县级分布数据库。利用该数据库,我们阐明了NKPWPs的地理分布格局,并确定了原地和非原地保护的差距。结果:本研究分析的NKPWPs包括1128种植物。我们建立了这些物种的县级分布数据库,有30,397条记录。详细分析表明,这些物种主要分布在中国南部山区,包括喜马拉雅山脉东部-横断山脉、云南南部、云贵桂边境和武陵山区。在1118个胚胎种中,原位保存的1060种(94.81%),非原位保存的681种(60.91%),非原位保存的660种(59.03%)。此外,威胁程度较高、分布范围有限的物种在迁地和原地的保护覆盖度均较低;37种未得到保护(3.31%)。结论:本研究建立的国家级国家级植物资源分布数据库全面描述了中国国家级植物资源的地理分布格局,为物种保护规划提供了有价值的数据,并为解决中国国家级植物资源保护存在的差距提供了基础框架。该数据库将最终支持有针对性的保护和资源配置,以有效地保护植物多样性。我们还建议对其他地区、全球或其他生物类群的保护策略采用综合评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating conservation gaps of China's national key protected wild plants: insights from county-level distribution data.

Background: The National Key Protected Wild Plants (NKPWPs) list serves as China's primary legal framework for plant diversity protection, with the species categorized into Level I (critically endangered, strictly protected) and Level II (lower risk but still requiring protection). However, the geographical distribution of these species and gaps in their conservation remain elusive due to the limited availability of data on species distribution. Thus, to address these gaps and support precise conservation, we developed a county-level distribution database for the NKPWP species using information primarily sourced from literature. Using this database, we elucidated the geographical distribution patterns of NKPWPs and identified the gaps in both in situ and ex situ conservation.

Results: The NKPWPs analyzed in the study included 1,128 plant species. We compiled a county-level distribution database for these species with 30,397 records. Detailed analysis of this data revealed that these species were concentrated in the mountainous regions of southern China, including the Eastern Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains, south Yunnan, the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi border, and the Wuling Mountains. Among the 1,118 embryophyte species of the checklist, 1,060 (94.81%) were found conserved in situ, 681 (60.91%) were found conserved ex situ, and 660 (59.03%) through both approaches. Besides, species with a higher threat level and limited distribution range exhibited lower conservation coverage in both ex situ and in situ approaches; 37 species received no conservation (3.31%).

Conclusions: The county-level distribution database developed in this study comprehensively depicts the geographical distribution patterns of NKPWP in China, offering valuable data for planning species conservation and providing a foundational framework for addressing the existing gaps in their conservation across China. This database will ultimately support targeted conservation and resource allocation to protect plant diversity effectively. We also suggest adopting an integrated evaluation approach for conservation strategies in other areas, globally, or for other biological groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信