粮食联合邻国(联合国):一项试点研究,探索共同设计的干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步影响,以改善粮食获取。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tamara Petresin, Marciane Any, Nayssam Shujauddin, Angela Annis, Jess Haines
{"title":"粮食联合邻国(联合国):一项试点研究,探索共同设计的干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步影响,以改善粮食获取。","authors":"Tamara Petresin, Marciane Any, Nayssam Shujauddin, Angela Annis, Jess Haines","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23356-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food insecurity remains a critical issue in Canada, with 15.6% of households affected. Food access, an important component of food security, reflects the ability of individuals to secure food. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of five co-designed interventions designed to improve nutritious food access in the Onward Willow neighbourhood of Guelph, ON.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen Community Advisors worked with University of Guelph researchers and used co-design to develop, implement, and pilot test five interventions to improve food access: community cafés, food skills workshops, grocery gift cards, gardening materials and workshops, and transportation support. The interventions were pilot tested with 159 community members, and feasibility and acceptability were assessed through surveys and interviews. Preliminary impact was assessed through quantitative pre-post or post-only Likert-scale survey measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings show that the interventions were feasible and acceptable as all interventions were implemented per protocol and participant satisfaction was high across all interventions. Post-only evaluations identified that participants perceived that the community cafés helped to increase community connection and that the transportation support made it easier to have healthy foods available in their home. Pre-post evaluations revealed that the food skills workshops improved participants' sense of community with a medium effect size (median = 4.12 [IQR 3.87-4.47] to 4.12 [IQR 3.91-4.87], p = .04, r = .33) and that the gardening materials and workshops resulted in increased fruit and vegetable availability with a large effect size (median = 3.00 [IQR 2.00-3.00] to 4.00 [IQR 3.00 to 4.00], p = .04, r = .78). Grocery gift cards did not result in any significant changes in food access outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions that directly engage communities in creating solutions can be feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective. Future research is needed to explore long-term impacts of these interventions on diet quality and broader health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2086"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food uniting neighbours (f.u.n.): a pilot study exploring the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of co-designed interventions to improve food access.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Petresin, Marciane Any, Nayssam Shujauddin, Angela Annis, Jess Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-23356-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food insecurity remains a critical issue in Canada, with 15.6% of households affected. Food access, an important component of food security, reflects the ability of individuals to secure food. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of five co-designed interventions designed to improve nutritious food access in the Onward Willow neighbourhood of Guelph, ON.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen Community Advisors worked with University of Guelph researchers and used co-design to develop, implement, and pilot test five interventions to improve food access: community cafés, food skills workshops, grocery gift cards, gardening materials and workshops, and transportation support. The interventions were pilot tested with 159 community members, and feasibility and acceptability were assessed through surveys and interviews. Preliminary impact was assessed through quantitative pre-post or post-only Likert-scale survey measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings show that the interventions were feasible and acceptable as all interventions were implemented per protocol and participant satisfaction was high across all interventions. Post-only evaluations identified that participants perceived that the community cafés helped to increase community connection and that the transportation support made it easier to have healthy foods available in their home. Pre-post evaluations revealed that the food skills workshops improved participants' sense of community with a medium effect size (median = 4.12 [IQR 3.87-4.47] to 4.12 [IQR 3.91-4.87], p = .04, r = .33) and that the gardening materials and workshops resulted in increased fruit and vegetable availability with a large effect size (median = 3.00 [IQR 2.00-3.00] to 4.00 [IQR 3.00 to 4.00], p = .04, r = .78). Grocery gift cards did not result in any significant changes in food access outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions that directly engage communities in creating solutions can be feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective. Future research is needed to explore long-term impacts of these interventions on diet quality and broader health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23356-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23356-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食品不安全仍然是加拿大的一个严重问题,15.6%的家庭受到影响。粮食获取是粮食安全的重要组成部分,反映了个人获得粮食的能力。这项试点研究旨在评估五项共同设计的干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步影响,这些干预措施旨在改善安大略省圭尔夫的Onward Willow社区的营养食物获取。方法:13名社区顾问与圭尔夫大学的研究人员合作,采用共同设计的方法开发、实施和试点测试了五种改善食物获取的干预措施:社区咖啡、食品技能讲习班、杂货礼品卡、园艺材料和讲习班以及交通支持。这些干预措施在159名社区成员中进行了试点测试,并通过调查和访谈评估了可行性和可接受性。通过定量的事后或事后李克特量表调查措施评估初步影响。结果:研究结果表明,所有干预措施都是可行和可接受的,因为所有干预措施都是按协议实施的,所有干预措施的参与者满意度都很高。事后评价发现,参与者认为社区咖啡机有助于加强社区联系,交通方面的支助使他们更容易在家中获得健康食品。食物技能工作坊改善了参与者的社区意识,具有中等效应(中位数= 4.12 [IQR 3.87-4.47]至4.12 [IQR 3.91-4.87], p =。04, r = .33),园艺材料和车间增加了水果和蔬菜的可利用性,且效应量很大(中位数= 3.00 [IQR 2.00-3.00]至4.00 [IQR 3.00 - 4.00], p =。04, r = .78)。食品杂货礼品卡没有导致食物获取结果的任何重大变化。结论:直接让社区参与创造解决方案的干预措施是可行的、可接受的,并且可能有效。未来的研究需要探索这些干预措施对饮食质量和更广泛的健康结果的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food uniting neighbours (f.u.n.): a pilot study exploring the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of co-designed interventions to improve food access.

Background: Food insecurity remains a critical issue in Canada, with 15.6% of households affected. Food access, an important component of food security, reflects the ability of individuals to secure food. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of five co-designed interventions designed to improve nutritious food access in the Onward Willow neighbourhood of Guelph, ON.

Methods: Thirteen Community Advisors worked with University of Guelph researchers and used co-design to develop, implement, and pilot test five interventions to improve food access: community cafés, food skills workshops, grocery gift cards, gardening materials and workshops, and transportation support. The interventions were pilot tested with 159 community members, and feasibility and acceptability were assessed through surveys and interviews. Preliminary impact was assessed through quantitative pre-post or post-only Likert-scale survey measures.

Results: Findings show that the interventions were feasible and acceptable as all interventions were implemented per protocol and participant satisfaction was high across all interventions. Post-only evaluations identified that participants perceived that the community cafés helped to increase community connection and that the transportation support made it easier to have healthy foods available in their home. Pre-post evaluations revealed that the food skills workshops improved participants' sense of community with a medium effect size (median = 4.12 [IQR 3.87-4.47] to 4.12 [IQR 3.91-4.87], p = .04, r = .33) and that the gardening materials and workshops resulted in increased fruit and vegetable availability with a large effect size (median = 3.00 [IQR 2.00-3.00] to 4.00 [IQR 3.00 to 4.00], p = .04, r = .78). Grocery gift cards did not result in any significant changes in food access outcomes.

Conclusions: Interventions that directly engage communities in creating solutions can be feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective. Future research is needed to explore long-term impacts of these interventions on diet quality and broader health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信