利用第三代测序优化鼻粘膜液DNA提取评估鼻腔微生物组。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Samuel T Montgomery, Phoebe G Carr, Jose A Caparrós-Martín
{"title":"利用第三代测序优化鼻粘膜液DNA提取评估鼻腔微生物组。","authors":"Samuel T Montgomery, Phoebe G Carr, Jose A Caparrós-Martín","doi":"10.1165/rcmb.2025-0046MA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sampling nasal lining fluid (NLF) via nasosorption is minimally invasive and well tolerated, but the feasibility of assessing the nasal microbiome using these samples is unknown. However, low biomass makes airway samples particularly susceptible to issues related to contaminant DNA. For this study, we collected nasal swabs and NLF from adult volunteers. DNA was extracted from a mock microbial community and NLF using a column-based kit (ZymoBIOMICS), a precipitation-based kit (Qiagen), or a previously published precipitation-based method. Quality and quantity of DNA was assessed and short-read <i>16S rRNA</i> sequencing performed to assess feasibility and extraction bias. An optimised methodology was used to extract DNA from NLF and nasal swabs, and long-read <i>16S rRNA</i> sequencing performed to compare microbial profiles between NLF and nasal swabs. All extraction methods recovered DNA from the mock community, but only precipitation-based methods yielded sufficient DNA from NLF. Extraction methodologies significantly affected microbial profiles, with mechanical lysis needed to minimize bias. Profiles obtained from NLF and swabs were comparable with long-read sequencing. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of profiling the nasal microbiome using NLF and validated two extraction methodologies as suitable for full-length <i>16S rRNA</i> sequencing of low-biomass respiratory samples. Our data demonstrate the importance of unbiased DNA extraction methodologies in low-biomass respiratory samples. Additionally, we demonstrated NLF may be an appropriate surrogate for swabs to assess the nasal microbiome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7655,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimisation of DNA Extraction from Nasal Lining Fluid to Assess the Nasal Microbiome Using Third-Generation Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel T Montgomery, Phoebe G Carr, Jose A Caparrós-Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.1165/rcmb.2025-0046MA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sampling nasal lining fluid (NLF) via nasosorption is minimally invasive and well tolerated, but the feasibility of assessing the nasal microbiome using these samples is unknown. However, low biomass makes airway samples particularly susceptible to issues related to contaminant DNA. For this study, we collected nasal swabs and NLF from adult volunteers. DNA was extracted from a mock microbial community and NLF using a column-based kit (ZymoBIOMICS), a precipitation-based kit (Qiagen), or a previously published precipitation-based method. Quality and quantity of DNA was assessed and short-read <i>16S rRNA</i> sequencing performed to assess feasibility and extraction bias. An optimised methodology was used to extract DNA from NLF and nasal swabs, and long-read <i>16S rRNA</i> sequencing performed to compare microbial profiles between NLF and nasal swabs. All extraction methods recovered DNA from the mock community, but only precipitation-based methods yielded sufficient DNA from NLF. Extraction methodologies significantly affected microbial profiles, with mechanical lysis needed to minimize bias. Profiles obtained from NLF and swabs were comparable with long-read sequencing. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of profiling the nasal microbiome using NLF and validated two extraction methodologies as suitable for full-length <i>16S rRNA</i> sequencing of low-biomass respiratory samples. Our data demonstrate the importance of unbiased DNA extraction methodologies in low-biomass respiratory samples. Additionally, we demonstrated NLF may be an appropriate surrogate for swabs to assess the nasal microbiome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2025-0046MA\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2025-0046MA","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过鼻吸收取样鼻粘膜液(NLF)是微创且耐受性良好的,但使用这些样本评估鼻腔微生物组的可行性尚不清楚。然而,低生物量使得气道样本特别容易受到污染DNA的影响。在这项研究中,我们收集了成人志愿者的鼻拭子和NLF。采用柱式试剂盒(ZymoBIOMICS)、沉淀法试剂盒(Qiagen)或先前发表的沉淀法,从模拟微生物群落和NLF中提取DNA。评估DNA的质量和数量,并进行短读16S rRNA测序以评估可行性和提取偏差。采用优化的方法从NLF和鼻拭子中提取DNA,并进行长读16S rRNA测序以比较NLF和鼻拭子之间的微生物谱。所有提取方法都能从模拟群落中提取DNA,但只有基于沉淀的方法才能从NLF中提取足够的DNA。提取方法显著影响微生物剖面,需要机械裂解以尽量减少偏差。从NLF和拭子中获得的基因图谱与长读测序具有可比性。我们的研究结果证明了使用NLF分析鼻腔微生物组的可行性,并验证了两种提取方法适用于低生物量呼吸样本的全长16S rRNA测序。我们的数据证明了在低生物量呼吸样本中无偏DNA提取方法的重要性。此外,我们证明NLF可能是拭子评估鼻腔微生物组的合适替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimisation of DNA Extraction from Nasal Lining Fluid to Assess the Nasal Microbiome Using Third-Generation Sequencing.

Sampling nasal lining fluid (NLF) via nasosorption is minimally invasive and well tolerated, but the feasibility of assessing the nasal microbiome using these samples is unknown. However, low biomass makes airway samples particularly susceptible to issues related to contaminant DNA. For this study, we collected nasal swabs and NLF from adult volunteers. DNA was extracted from a mock microbial community and NLF using a column-based kit (ZymoBIOMICS), a precipitation-based kit (Qiagen), or a previously published precipitation-based method. Quality and quantity of DNA was assessed and short-read 16S rRNA sequencing performed to assess feasibility and extraction bias. An optimised methodology was used to extract DNA from NLF and nasal swabs, and long-read 16S rRNA sequencing performed to compare microbial profiles between NLF and nasal swabs. All extraction methods recovered DNA from the mock community, but only precipitation-based methods yielded sufficient DNA from NLF. Extraction methodologies significantly affected microbial profiles, with mechanical lysis needed to minimize bias. Profiles obtained from NLF and swabs were comparable with long-read sequencing. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of profiling the nasal microbiome using NLF and validated two extraction methodologies as suitable for full-length 16S rRNA sequencing of low-biomass respiratory samples. Our data demonstrate the importance of unbiased DNA extraction methodologies in low-biomass respiratory samples. Additionally, we demonstrated NLF may be an appropriate surrogate for swabs to assess the nasal microbiome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
370
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology publishes papers that report significant and original observations in the area of pulmonary biology. The focus of the Journal includes, but is not limited to, cellular, biochemical, molecular, developmental, genetic, and immunologic studies of lung cells and molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信