食物垃圾与城市污泥的比例如何影响厌氧消化:性能评估和抗生素抗性基因的命运。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kasra Pourrostami Niavol, Achinta Bordoloi, Sean McKelvey, Rominder P. S. Suri
{"title":"食物垃圾与城市污泥的比例如何影响厌氧消化:性能评估和抗生素抗性基因的命运。","authors":"Kasra Pourrostami Niavol,&nbsp;Achinta Bordoloi,&nbsp;Sean McKelvey,&nbsp;Rominder P. S. Suri","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36590-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge (SS) has shown superior performance over anaerobic mono-digestion. However, the fate of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) under various co-digestion ratios has been rarely reported to date. Thus, this study investigates the effects of FW:SS ratios on the digester’s performance and the fate of ARGs at different FW:SS ratios. The results demonstrated that at a 50:50 FW:SS ratio, 738 mL.g<sup>−1</sup> VS of biogas and 393 mL.g<sup>−1</sup> VS of methane were produced in the system on day 18. Response surface methodology (RSM) was also used for optimization, showing 42.5% FW is the optimal FW content for maximum biogas and minimum H<sub>2</sub>S production. The distribution of select ARGs (<i>qnrS</i>, <i>tetA</i>, <i>emrB</i>, <i>bla</i><sub><i>TEM</i></sub>, <i>ampR</i>) was tracked in the liquid and solid fraction of the digestate. Results illustrated a decrease (83–99% reduction) in the overall abundance of the ARGs in the solid fraction after AD. A similar trend was observed for the ARGs in the liquid fractions (65–99% reduction), except for <i>ermB</i> which became 1.74–10.6-fold higher in the final digestate. Also, at 50% FW, the abundance of <i>intl1</i> increased in the liquid and solid fraction of digestate, indicating increased potential of ARG dissemination via horizontal gene transfer.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 25","pages":"15096 - 15110"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does food waste to municipal sludge ratio affect anaerobic digestion: performance evaluation and fate of antibiotic resistance genes\",\"authors\":\"Kasra Pourrostami Niavol,&nbsp;Achinta Bordoloi,&nbsp;Sean McKelvey,&nbsp;Rominder P. S. Suri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36590-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge (SS) has shown superior performance over anaerobic mono-digestion. However, the fate of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) under various co-digestion ratios has been rarely reported to date. Thus, this study investigates the effects of FW:SS ratios on the digester’s performance and the fate of ARGs at different FW:SS ratios. The results demonstrated that at a 50:50 FW:SS ratio, 738 mL.g<sup>−1</sup> VS of biogas and 393 mL.g<sup>−1</sup> VS of methane were produced in the system on day 18. Response surface methodology (RSM) was also used for optimization, showing 42.5% FW is the optimal FW content for maximum biogas and minimum H<sub>2</sub>S production. The distribution of select ARGs (<i>qnrS</i>, <i>tetA</i>, <i>emrB</i>, <i>bla</i><sub><i>TEM</i></sub>, <i>ampR</i>) was tracked in the liquid and solid fraction of the digestate. Results illustrated a decrease (83–99% reduction) in the overall abundance of the ARGs in the solid fraction after AD. A similar trend was observed for the ARGs in the liquid fractions (65–99% reduction), except for <i>ermB</i> which became 1.74–10.6-fold higher in the final digestate. Also, at 50% FW, the abundance of <i>intl1</i> increased in the liquid and solid fraction of digestate, indicating increased potential of ARG dissemination via horizontal gene transfer.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 25\",\"pages\":\"15096 - 15110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36590-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36590-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食物垃圾(FW)和污水污泥(SS)的厌氧共消化表现出优于厌氧单一消化的性能。然而,迄今为止,抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)在不同共消化比例下的命运很少有报道。因此,本研究探讨了FW:SS比对不同FW:SS比下消化池性能和ARGs命运的影响。结果表明,在FW:SS为50:50的条件下,系统第18天产生沼气738 mL.g-1 VS,甲烷393 mL.g-1 VS。采用响应面法(RSM)进行优化,结果表明42.5%的FW含量为最大沼气和最小H2S产量的最佳FW含量。测定了部分ARGs (qnrS、tetA、emrB、blaTEM、ampR)在消化液和固体组分中的分布。结果显示,AD后固体部分中ARGs的总体丰度下降(减少83-99%)。液体馏分中的ARGs也有类似的趋势(降低65-99%),但最终消化液中的ermB升高了1.74-10.6倍。此外,在50% FW时,消化液和固体部分的int1丰度增加,表明ARG通过水平基因转移传播的潜力增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does food waste to municipal sludge ratio affect anaerobic digestion: performance evaluation and fate of antibiotic resistance genes

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sewage sludge (SS) has shown superior performance over anaerobic mono-digestion. However, the fate of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) under various co-digestion ratios has been rarely reported to date. Thus, this study investigates the effects of FW:SS ratios on the digester’s performance and the fate of ARGs at different FW:SS ratios. The results demonstrated that at a 50:50 FW:SS ratio, 738 mL.g−1 VS of biogas and 393 mL.g−1 VS of methane were produced in the system on day 18. Response surface methodology (RSM) was also used for optimization, showing 42.5% FW is the optimal FW content for maximum biogas and minimum H2S production. The distribution of select ARGs (qnrS, tetA, emrB, blaTEM, ampR) was tracked in the liquid and solid fraction of the digestate. Results illustrated a decrease (83–99% reduction) in the overall abundance of the ARGs in the solid fraction after AD. A similar trend was observed for the ARGs in the liquid fractions (65–99% reduction), except for ermB which became 1.74–10.6-fold higher in the final digestate. Also, at 50% FW, the abundance of intl1 increased in the liquid and solid fraction of digestate, indicating increased potential of ARG dissemination via horizontal gene transfer.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信