Ciaran M C Maloney, Andrew J Atkin, Lee C Beaumont, Emily Budzynski-Seymour, Victoria E Warburton
{"title":"儿童和青少年联合运动行为干预的特点:范围综述。","authors":"Ciaran M C Maloney, Andrew J Atkin, Lee C Beaumont, Emily Budzynski-Seymour, Victoria E Warburton","doi":"10.1111/obr.13943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence suggests that targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in combination can benefit health and academic outcomes in young people. This scoping review aimed to describe the extent, range, and nature of combined movement behavior interventions and examine recruitment and effectiveness patterns in equity-denied populations. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Gray literature was identified through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Google Scholar, and the British Library EThOS. Included studies were randomized or quasi-experimental interventions that modified two or more movement behaviors with the goal of affecting health-, behavioral-, or academic-related outcomes in children or adolescents. Peer-reviewed publications from scientific databases, master's level dissertations, and doctoral theses from gray literature searches in the English language were included. The behavior change technique taxonomy and PROGRESS-Plus framework were used to map intervention characteristics. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were individual-level randomized controlled trials (40%), conducted in Europe (43%), and delivered in a school setting (77%). Physical activity and sedentary behavior were the predominant behaviors that were modified (83%). The most commonly used behavior change techniques included information about health consequences (67%) and social support [unspecified] (70%). All included studies focused on health-related outcome measures. Ten studies (33%) examined differential effects by PROGRESS-Plus subgroups. Future research should explore the value of movement behavior interventions across the breadth of non-health-related outcomes and include a stronger focus on differential effectiveness across population subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13943"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Combined Movement Behavior Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ciaran M C Maloney, Andrew J Atkin, Lee C Beaumont, Emily Budzynski-Seymour, Victoria E Warburton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence suggests that targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in combination can benefit health and academic outcomes in young people. This scoping review aimed to describe the extent, range, and nature of combined movement behavior interventions and examine recruitment and effectiveness patterns in equity-denied populations. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Gray literature was identified through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Google Scholar, and the British Library EThOS. Included studies were randomized or quasi-experimental interventions that modified two or more movement behaviors with the goal of affecting health-, behavioral-, or academic-related outcomes in children or adolescents. Peer-reviewed publications from scientific databases, master's level dissertations, and doctoral theses from gray literature searches in the English language were included. The behavior change technique taxonomy and PROGRESS-Plus framework were used to map intervention characteristics. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were individual-level randomized controlled trials (40%), conducted in Europe (43%), and delivered in a school setting (77%). Physical activity and sedentary behavior were the predominant behaviors that were modified (83%). The most commonly used behavior change techniques included information about health consequences (67%) and social support [unspecified] (70%). All included studies focused on health-related outcome measures. Ten studies (33%) examined differential effects by PROGRESS-Plus subgroups. Future research should explore the value of movement behavior interventions across the breadth of non-health-related outcomes and include a stronger focus on differential effectiveness across population subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13943\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有证据表明,将体育活动、久坐行为和睡眠结合起来,对年轻人的健康和学业成绩都有好处。本综述旨在描述联合运动行为干预的程度、范围和性质,并检查在被剥夺公平的人群中的招募和有效性模式。检索了以下电子数据库:Web of Science、CINAHL、MEDLINE和PsycINFO。灰色文献是通过ProQuest学位论文和论文全球、谷歌学者和大英图书馆精神确定的。纳入的研究是随机或准实验干预,以影响儿童或青少年的健康、行为或学业相关结果为目标,改变两种或两种以上的运动行为。来自科学数据库的同行评议出版物、硕士学位论文和英文灰色文献检索的博士论文被包括在内。使用行为改变技术分类法和PROGRESS-Plus框架来绘制干预特征。30项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究是个人水平的随机对照试验(40%),在欧洲进行(43%),在学校环境中进行(77%)。体力活动和久坐行为是改变的主要行为(83%)。最常用的行为改变技术包括有关健康后果的信息(67%)和社会支持(70%)。所有纳入的研究都关注与健康相关的结果测量。10项研究(33%)检查了PROGRESS-Plus亚组的不同效果。未来的研究应该在非健康相关结果的广度上探索运动行为干预的价值,并包括更关注不同人群亚组的差异效果。
Characteristics of Combined Movement Behavior Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.
Evidence suggests that targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in combination can benefit health and academic outcomes in young people. This scoping review aimed to describe the extent, range, and nature of combined movement behavior interventions and examine recruitment and effectiveness patterns in equity-denied populations. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Gray literature was identified through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Google Scholar, and the British Library EThOS. Included studies were randomized or quasi-experimental interventions that modified two or more movement behaviors with the goal of affecting health-, behavioral-, or academic-related outcomes in children or adolescents. Peer-reviewed publications from scientific databases, master's level dissertations, and doctoral theses from gray literature searches in the English language were included. The behavior change technique taxonomy and PROGRESS-Plus framework were used to map intervention characteristics. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were individual-level randomized controlled trials (40%), conducted in Europe (43%), and delivered in a school setting (77%). Physical activity and sedentary behavior were the predominant behaviors that were modified (83%). The most commonly used behavior change techniques included information about health consequences (67%) and social support [unspecified] (70%). All included studies focused on health-related outcome measures. Ten studies (33%) examined differential effects by PROGRESS-Plus subgroups. Future research should explore the value of movement behavior interventions across the breadth of non-health-related outcomes and include a stronger focus on differential effectiveness across population subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.