Charles Deng, Enrique Oviedo, Marc Fishman, Albert Burgess-Hull
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍治疗保留的比较研究:皮下注射丁丙诺啡与舌下注射丁丙诺啡。","authors":"Charles Deng, Enrique Oviedo, Marc Fishman, Albert Burgess-Hull","doi":"10.1111/add.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Buprenorphine treatment for opioid-use disorder (OUD) is commonly available in both sublingual tablets/films and extended-release subcutaneous injections; however, little is known about differences in patient retention between these two buprenorphine formulations. This study measured retention differences between patients who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine and those who remained on sublingual buprenorphine throughout treatment, within a multi-location outpatient addiction treatment practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This study was an observational propensity score-matched cohort study conducted at a multi-location outpatient addiction practice in Maryland, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants included 3609 patients receiving buprenorphine treatment for OUD between June 2019 and February 2024.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Patient demographics, health history and urine toxicology results. The primary outcome was time-to-dropout in days. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models with propensity score matching were used to compare treatment retention between injectable and sublingual buprenorphine receipt.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, 538 patients at the time of their first extended-release buprenorphine injection (INJ) were matched with 538 patients only receiving sublingual buprenorphine (SUB-only). In the unmatched sample, INJ patients were more likely than SUB-only patients to be female (INJ 47.2% vs SUB-only 38.7%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have at least an associate's degree (41.4% vs 33.9%, P < 0.001). After matching, patients who transitioned to INJ buprenorphine had lower retention in treatment compared with patients who remained on SUB buprenorphine. Median (95% confidence interval) time-to-dropout was 269 days (218-313) for INJ patients compared with 389 days (313-592) for SUB-only patients (stratified log-rank test = 13.6, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder in an outpatient setting, those who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine were at an increased risk for dropout compared with matched patients who only received sublingual buprenorphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of treatment retention in opioid use disorder: Subcutaneous injectable versus sublingual buprenorphine.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Deng, Enrique Oviedo, Marc Fishman, Albert Burgess-Hull\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Buprenorphine treatment for opioid-use disorder (OUD) is commonly available in both sublingual tablets/films and extended-release subcutaneous injections; however, little is known about differences in patient retention between these two buprenorphine formulations. This study measured retention differences between patients who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine and those who remained on sublingual buprenorphine throughout treatment, within a multi-location outpatient addiction treatment practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This study was an observational propensity score-matched cohort study conducted at a multi-location outpatient addiction practice in Maryland, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants included 3609 patients receiving buprenorphine treatment for OUD between June 2019 and February 2024.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Patient demographics, health history and urine toxicology results. The primary outcome was time-to-dropout in days. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models with propensity score matching were used to compare treatment retention between injectable and sublingual buprenorphine receipt.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, 538 patients at the time of their first extended-release buprenorphine injection (INJ) were matched with 538 patients only receiving sublingual buprenorphine (SUB-only). In the unmatched sample, INJ patients were more likely than SUB-only patients to be female (INJ 47.2% vs SUB-only 38.7%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have at least an associate's degree (41.4% vs 33.9%, P < 0.001). After matching, patients who transitioned to INJ buprenorphine had lower retention in treatment compared with patients who remained on SUB buprenorphine. Median (95% confidence interval) time-to-dropout was 269 days (218-313) for INJ patients compared with 389 days (313-592) for SUB-only patients (stratified log-rank test = 13.6, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder in an outpatient setting, those who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine were at an increased risk for dropout compared with matched patients who only received sublingual buprenorphine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70105\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)通常以舌下片剂/片和缓释皮下注射两种方式提供;然而,对于这两种丁丙诺啡制剂在患者滞留方面的差异知之甚少。这项研究测量了在多地点门诊成瘾治疗实践中,从舌下注射到皮下注射丁丙诺啡的患者与在整个治疗过程中仍然使用丁丙诺啡的患者之间的保留差异。设计和背景:本研究是一项观察性倾向评分匹配队列研究,在美国马里兰州的一个多地点门诊成瘾实践中进行。参与者:参与者包括3609名在2019年6月至2024年2月期间接受丁丙诺啡治疗OUD的患者。测量方法:患者人口统计学、健康史和尿液毒理学结果。主要结果是以天为单位的退学时间。采用倾向评分匹配的Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险模型比较注射丁丙诺啡和舌下丁丙诺啡的治疗保留情况。结果:总体而言,538名首次接受丁丙诺啡缓释注射(INJ)的患者与538名仅接受舌下丁丙诺啡(SUB-only)的患者相匹配。在未匹配的样本中,INJ患者比SUB-only患者更有可能是女性(INJ 47.2% vs SUB-only 38.7%)。结论:在门诊接受阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的患者中,从舌下注射过渡到皮下注射丁丙诺啡的患者与只接受舌下注射丁丙诺啡的匹配患者相比,退出的风险增加。
A comparative study of treatment retention in opioid use disorder: Subcutaneous injectable versus sublingual buprenorphine.
Background and aims: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid-use disorder (OUD) is commonly available in both sublingual tablets/films and extended-release subcutaneous injections; however, little is known about differences in patient retention between these two buprenorphine formulations. This study measured retention differences between patients who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine and those who remained on sublingual buprenorphine throughout treatment, within a multi-location outpatient addiction treatment practice.
Design and setting: This study was an observational propensity score-matched cohort study conducted at a multi-location outpatient addiction practice in Maryland, USA.
Participants: Participants included 3609 patients receiving buprenorphine treatment for OUD between June 2019 and February 2024.
Measurements: Patient demographics, health history and urine toxicology results. The primary outcome was time-to-dropout in days. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models with propensity score matching were used to compare treatment retention between injectable and sublingual buprenorphine receipt.
Findings: Overall, 538 patients at the time of their first extended-release buprenorphine injection (INJ) were matched with 538 patients only receiving sublingual buprenorphine (SUB-only). In the unmatched sample, INJ patients were more likely than SUB-only patients to be female (INJ 47.2% vs SUB-only 38.7%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have at least an associate's degree (41.4% vs 33.9%, P < 0.001). After matching, patients who transitioned to INJ buprenorphine had lower retention in treatment compared with patients who remained on SUB buprenorphine. Median (95% confidence interval) time-to-dropout was 269 days (218-313) for INJ patients compared with 389 days (313-592) for SUB-only patients (stratified log-rank test = 13.6, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Among patients receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder in an outpatient setting, those who transitioned from sublingual to subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine were at an increased risk for dropout compared with matched patients who only received sublingual buprenorphine.
期刊介绍:
Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines.
Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries.
Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.