Christian Pescher , Gerard J. Tellis , Johann Füller
{"title":"创意家在创新竞赛中的成功:参与、效率还是压力?","authors":"Christian Pescher , Gerard J. Tellis , Johann Füller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Success in innovation tournaments depends critically on ideators’ attributes. The authors test three important attributes: participation (i.e., one-shot vs. serial ideators), productivity (number of ideas submitted), and time pressure (approaching deadline). The data come from nine fixed-time innovation tournaments conducted for large corporations. Findings and contributions are as follows: first, while prior research has emphasized fixation or self-selection, we find that a diversity of skills (a) leads to serial participation and (b) favors success. Second, while prior research has led to contradictory results on productivity, we find that the number of prior cumulative ideas submitted within an innovation tournament positively affects success for serial but not one-shot ideators. However, the number of submitted ideas on a single day negatively affects success for all ideators. Third, while prior research has emphasized the importance of deadlines to avoid procrastination, we find that deadlines lead to rushing of ideas with a steeply increasing number of ideas but declining quality. The phenomenon of rushing is highest in the shortest innovation tournaments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages 335-364"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideators’ success in innovation tournaments: Participation, productivity, or pressure?\",\"authors\":\"Christian Pescher , Gerard J. Tellis , Johann Füller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Success in innovation tournaments depends critically on ideators’ attributes. The authors test three important attributes: participation (i.e., one-shot vs. serial ideators), productivity (number of ideas submitted), and time pressure (approaching deadline). The data come from nine fixed-time innovation tournaments conducted for large corporations. Findings and contributions are as follows: first, while prior research has emphasized fixation or self-selection, we find that a diversity of skills (a) leads to serial participation and (b) favors success. Second, while prior research has led to contradictory results on productivity, we find that the number of prior cumulative ideas submitted within an innovation tournament positively affects success for serial but not one-shot ideators. However, the number of submitted ideas on a single day negatively affects success for all ideators. Third, while prior research has emphasized the importance of deadlines to avoid procrastination, we find that deadlines lead to rushing of ideas with a steeply increasing number of ideas but declining quality. The phenomenon of rushing is highest in the shortest innovation tournaments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 335-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811624000855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ideators’ success in innovation tournaments: Participation, productivity, or pressure?
Success in innovation tournaments depends critically on ideators’ attributes. The authors test three important attributes: participation (i.e., one-shot vs. serial ideators), productivity (number of ideas submitted), and time pressure (approaching deadline). The data come from nine fixed-time innovation tournaments conducted for large corporations. Findings and contributions are as follows: first, while prior research has emphasized fixation or self-selection, we find that a diversity of skills (a) leads to serial participation and (b) favors success. Second, while prior research has led to contradictory results on productivity, we find that the number of prior cumulative ideas submitted within an innovation tournament positively affects success for serial but not one-shot ideators. However, the number of submitted ideas on a single day negatively affects success for all ideators. Third, while prior research has emphasized the importance of deadlines to avoid procrastination, we find that deadlines lead to rushing of ideas with a steeply increasing number of ideas but declining quality. The phenomenon of rushing is highest in the shortest innovation tournaments.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Research in Marketing is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal for marketing academics and practitioners. Building on a great tradition of global marketing scholarship, IJRM aims to contribute substantially to the field of marketing research by providing a high-quality medium for the dissemination of new marketing knowledge and methods. Among IJRM targeted audience are marketing scholars, practitioners (e.g., marketing research and consulting professionals) and other interested groups and individuals.