城市近自然植物群落景观视觉质量的时空尺度评价:一种nomogram可视化方法

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dong Dong , Mingxin Chen , Xin Wen , Qing Li , Tieqiao Xiao , Fengquan Ji
{"title":"城市近自然植物群落景观视觉质量的时空尺度评价:一种nomogram可视化方法","authors":"Dong Dong ,&nbsp;Mingxin Chen ,&nbsp;Xin Wen ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Tieqiao Xiao ,&nbsp;Fengquan Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantifying factors influencing landscape visual quality (LVQ) in urban near-natural plant communities (NNPCs) is essential for promoting the mainstreaming of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and revealing connections between human perception and natural environments. However, existing research often relies on complex formulations that hinder practical application of the models constructed. This study systematically evaluated the LVQ of plant communities across spatiotemporal scales by surveying 65 NNPCs in Hefei city, capturing landscape photographs covering four seasons from two viewpoints (interior and exterior landscapes), and employing the Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) method. The research identified 25 landscape characteristic indicators across four dimensions: structural, phenological, environmental, and morphological. Logistic regression was used for indicator analysis, while nomograms were employed to illustrate relationships between key factors and LVQ. Unlike other models, the nomogram visualization model intuitively displays the contribution weight of each indicator to LVQ, making complex statistical relationships easier to understand and apply. The study found that background clarity (OR <sub>interior “clear”</sub> = 5.53, OR <sub>exterior “clear”</sub> = 3.63), green view ratio (OR <sub>interior</sub> = 1.62, OR <sub>exterior</sub> = 2.23), and permeability (OR <sub>interior</sub> = 1.84, OR <sub>exterior</sub> = 1.70) had significant impacts across different seasons and spatial scales, while other factors exhibited obvious seasonal or spatial specificity. Some qualitative indicators showed higher influence levels when at “medium” states, indicating that maintaining reasonable indicator levels plays an important role in enhancing LVQ. The research results provide intuitive, quantifiable scientific evidence for urban designers and planners, helping to optimize plant configuration in urban green spaces and improve overall landscape quality. Meanwhile, this study has significant implications for promoting the application and evaluation of NNPC as NbS in human-dominated landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 113683"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatio-temporal scale evaluation of landscape visual quality in urban near-natural plant communities: A nomogram visualization approach\",\"authors\":\"Dong Dong ,&nbsp;Mingxin Chen ,&nbsp;Xin Wen ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Tieqiao Xiao ,&nbsp;Fengquan Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Quantifying factors influencing landscape visual quality (LVQ) in urban near-natural plant communities (NNPCs) is essential for promoting the mainstreaming of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and revealing connections between human perception and natural environments. However, existing research often relies on complex formulations that hinder practical application of the models constructed. This study systematically evaluated the LVQ of plant communities across spatiotemporal scales by surveying 65 NNPCs in Hefei city, capturing landscape photographs covering four seasons from two viewpoints (interior and exterior landscapes), and employing the Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) method. The research identified 25 landscape characteristic indicators across four dimensions: structural, phenological, environmental, and morphological. Logistic regression was used for indicator analysis, while nomograms were employed to illustrate relationships between key factors and LVQ. Unlike other models, the nomogram visualization model intuitively displays the contribution weight of each indicator to LVQ, making complex statistical relationships easier to understand and apply. The study found that background clarity (OR <sub>interior “clear”</sub> = 5.53, OR <sub>exterior “clear”</sub> = 3.63), green view ratio (OR <sub>interior</sub> = 1.62, OR <sub>exterior</sub> = 2.23), and permeability (OR <sub>interior</sub> = 1.84, OR <sub>exterior</sub> = 1.70) had significant impacts across different seasons and spatial scales, while other factors exhibited obvious seasonal or spatial specificity. Some qualitative indicators showed higher influence levels when at “medium” states, indicating that maintaining reasonable indicator levels plays an important role in enhancing LVQ. The research results provide intuitive, quantifiable scientific evidence for urban designers and planners, helping to optimize plant configuration in urban green spaces and improve overall landscape quality. Meanwhile, this study has significant implications for promoting the application and evaluation of NNPC as NbS in human-dominated landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25006132\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25006132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量化城市近自然植物群落(nnpc)景观视觉质量(LVQ)的影响因素对于促进基于自然的解决方案(NbS)的主流化以及揭示人类感知与自然环境之间的联系至关重要。然而,现有的研究往往依赖于复杂的公式,这阻碍了所构建模型的实际应用。本研究通过对合肥市65个NNPCs进行调查,从室内景观和室外景观两个视角拍摄四季景观照片,并采用SBE (Scenic Beauty Estimation)方法,系统评价了合肥市植物群落的时空LVQ。研究确定了结构、物候、环境和形态四个维度的25个景观特征指标。指标分析采用Logistic回归,关键因素与LVQ的关系采用norm图。与其他模型不同,nomogram可视化模型直观地显示了各指标对LVQ的贡献权重,使复杂的统计关系更容易理解和应用。研究发现,背景清晰度(OR室内“clear”= 5.53,OR室外“clear”= 3.63)、绿视比(OR室内= 1.62,OR室外= 2.23)和渗透率(OR室内= 1.84,OR室外= 1.70)在不同季节和空间尺度上均有显著影响,其他因素表现出明显的季节或空间特异性。在“中等”状态下,一些定性指标的影响程度更高,说明保持合理的指标水平对LVQ的提升具有重要作用。研究结果为城市设计师和规划者提供了直观、可量化的科学依据,有助于优化城市绿地植物配置,提高整体景观质量。同时,该研究对于促进NNPC作为NbS在人类主导景观中的应用和评价具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Spatio-temporal scale evaluation of landscape visual quality in urban near-natural plant communities: A nomogram visualization approach

Spatio-temporal scale evaluation of landscape visual quality in urban near-natural plant communities: A nomogram visualization approach
Quantifying factors influencing landscape visual quality (LVQ) in urban near-natural plant communities (NNPCs) is essential for promoting the mainstreaming of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and revealing connections between human perception and natural environments. However, existing research often relies on complex formulations that hinder practical application of the models constructed. This study systematically evaluated the LVQ of plant communities across spatiotemporal scales by surveying 65 NNPCs in Hefei city, capturing landscape photographs covering four seasons from two viewpoints (interior and exterior landscapes), and employing the Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) method. The research identified 25 landscape characteristic indicators across four dimensions: structural, phenological, environmental, and morphological. Logistic regression was used for indicator analysis, while nomograms were employed to illustrate relationships between key factors and LVQ. Unlike other models, the nomogram visualization model intuitively displays the contribution weight of each indicator to LVQ, making complex statistical relationships easier to understand and apply. The study found that background clarity (OR interior “clear” = 5.53, OR exterior “clear” = 3.63), green view ratio (OR interior = 1.62, OR exterior = 2.23), and permeability (OR interior = 1.84, OR exterior = 1.70) had significant impacts across different seasons and spatial scales, while other factors exhibited obvious seasonal or spatial specificity. Some qualitative indicators showed higher influence levels when at “medium” states, indicating that maintaining reasonable indicator levels plays an important role in enhancing LVQ. The research results provide intuitive, quantifiable scientific evidence for urban designers and planners, helping to optimize plant configuration in urban green spaces and improve overall landscape quality. Meanwhile, this study has significant implications for promoting the application and evaluation of NNPC as NbS in human-dominated landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信