锌迁移、生理反应和基因表达的变化导致两种苹果砧木锌耐受性的差异

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jiayi Du , Sijun Qin , Jiali He , Deguo Lyu
{"title":"锌迁移、生理反应和基因表达的变化导致两种苹果砧木锌耐受性的差异","authors":"Jiayi Du ,&nbsp;Sijun Qin ,&nbsp;Jiali He ,&nbsp;Deguo Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To unravel the physiological and molecular regulation underlying the variation in zinc (Zn) tolerance between two contrasting apple rootstocks, namely, <em>Malus baccata</em> Borkh. (Mb) and <em>Malus hupehensis</em> Rehd. (Mh), seedling were exposed to either 1 or 100 μM Zn under hydroponic conditions. Growth inhibition and impairments in leaf anatomical structure were weaker in Mh than in Mb. The Zn concentrations were 14.2 % and 50.25 % lower in the roots and stems of Mh than in those of Mb, respectively. The translocation factor was reduced by 67.89 % and 44.64 % in Mh and Mb, respectively, in response to excess Zn. The Mh roots presented higher proportions of water-insoluble Zn than the Mb roots. The subcellular distribution of Zn revealed that cell walls (CWs) played an important role in Zn detoxification in both rootstocks. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis revealed that CWs of Mh had a stronger binding capacity for Zn than did those of Mb. The disturbance of the redox balance induced by excess Zn was weaker in Mh than in Mb. Excess Zn induced a greater reduction in the expression of genes involved in Zn uptake and translocation in the Mh roots than in the Mb roots. However, the expression of genes related to Zn detoxification increased more in Mh roots than in Mb roots. Our results suggest that Mh is more tolerant than Mb to excess Zn, which is ascribed largely to the greater inhibition of Zn mobility and activation of physiological responses and the stricter regulation of the expression of key genes involved in Zn uptake, translocation, remobilization, and detoxification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":"300 ","pages":"Article 118472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in zinc mobility, physiological responses and gene expression result in differences in zinc tolerance in two Malus rootstocks\",\"authors\":\"Jiayi Du ,&nbsp;Sijun Qin ,&nbsp;Jiali He ,&nbsp;Deguo Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To unravel the physiological and molecular regulation underlying the variation in zinc (Zn) tolerance between two contrasting apple rootstocks, namely, <em>Malus baccata</em> Borkh. (Mb) and <em>Malus hupehensis</em> Rehd. (Mh), seedling were exposed to either 1 or 100 μM Zn under hydroponic conditions. Growth inhibition and impairments in leaf anatomical structure were weaker in Mh than in Mb. The Zn concentrations were 14.2 % and 50.25 % lower in the roots and stems of Mh than in those of Mb, respectively. The translocation factor was reduced by 67.89 % and 44.64 % in Mh and Mb, respectively, in response to excess Zn. The Mh roots presented higher proportions of water-insoluble Zn than the Mb roots. The subcellular distribution of Zn revealed that cell walls (CWs) played an important role in Zn detoxification in both rootstocks. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis revealed that CWs of Mh had a stronger binding capacity for Zn than did those of Mb. The disturbance of the redox balance induced by excess Zn was weaker in Mh than in Mb. Excess Zn induced a greater reduction in the expression of genes involved in Zn uptake and translocation in the Mh roots than in the Mb roots. However, the expression of genes related to Zn detoxification increased more in Mh roots than in Mb roots. Our results suggest that Mh is more tolerant than Mb to excess Zn, which is ascribed largely to the greater inhibition of Zn mobility and activation of physiological responses and the stricter regulation of the expression of key genes involved in Zn uptake, translocation, remobilization, and detoxification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety\",\"volume\":\"300 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651325008127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651325008127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨苹果砧木(Malus baccata Borkh)锌耐受性差异的生理和分子调控机制。(Mb)及苹果(Malus hupehensis Rehd)。(Mh),幼苗在水培条件下暴露于1或100 μM Zn。Mh对植株生长的抑制作用和叶片解剖结构的损害较Mb弱,其根和茎的锌含量分别比Mb低14.2 %和50.25 %。在过量Zn的作用下,Mh和Mb的转运因子分别降低了67.89 %和44.64 %。Mh根的不溶性锌含量高于Mb根。锌的亚细胞分布表明,两种砧木的细胞壁在锌脱毒过程中起重要作用。傅里叶变换红外光谱分析表明,Mh对Zn的结合能力强于Mb,过量Zn对氧化还原平衡的干扰在Mh中弱于Mb,过量Zn诱导Mh根中与Zn吸收和转运相关基因的表达比在Mb根中更低。而与锌解毒相关的基因在Mh根中的表达量高于Mb根。我们的研究结果表明,与Mb相比,Mh对过量Zn的耐受性更强,这在很大程度上归因于对Zn迁移和生理反应的更大抑制,以及对参与Zn摄取、易位、再动员和解毒的关键基因表达的更严格调控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in zinc mobility, physiological responses and gene expression result in differences in zinc tolerance in two Malus rootstocks
To unravel the physiological and molecular regulation underlying the variation in zinc (Zn) tolerance between two contrasting apple rootstocks, namely, Malus baccata Borkh. (Mb) and Malus hupehensis Rehd. (Mh), seedling were exposed to either 1 or 100 μM Zn under hydroponic conditions. Growth inhibition and impairments in leaf anatomical structure were weaker in Mh than in Mb. The Zn concentrations were 14.2 % and 50.25 % lower in the roots and stems of Mh than in those of Mb, respectively. The translocation factor was reduced by 67.89 % and 44.64 % in Mh and Mb, respectively, in response to excess Zn. The Mh roots presented higher proportions of water-insoluble Zn than the Mb roots. The subcellular distribution of Zn revealed that cell walls (CWs) played an important role in Zn detoxification in both rootstocks. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis revealed that CWs of Mh had a stronger binding capacity for Zn than did those of Mb. The disturbance of the redox balance induced by excess Zn was weaker in Mh than in Mb. Excess Zn induced a greater reduction in the expression of genes involved in Zn uptake and translocation in the Mh roots than in the Mb roots. However, the expression of genes related to Zn detoxification increased more in Mh roots than in Mb roots. Our results suggest that Mh is more tolerant than Mb to excess Zn, which is ascribed largely to the greater inhibition of Zn mobility and activation of physiological responses and the stricter regulation of the expression of key genes involved in Zn uptake, translocation, remobilization, and detoxification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信