“食物的思想”:对心理状态因素如何影响可持续食物结果的系统回顾

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Louise Glenisson, Lotte Hallez, Tim Smits
{"title":"“食物的思想”:对心理状态因素如何影响可持续食物结果的系统回顾","authors":"Louise Glenisson,&nbsp;Lotte Hallez,&nbsp;Tim Smits","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the harmful environmental, social, and economic impacts of our current food system, it is essential to develop a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively shift consumers towards more sustainable food options. Since consumers' psychological state variables are highly susceptible to change, identifying those that significantly influence sustainable food outcomes (i.e., attitudes, intentions, behaviours) is crucial for both policymakers and marketing professionals.</div><div>Therefore, this review synthesises scientific research on consumers' psychological state variables and examines how these variables influence sustainable food outcomes. In doing so, this review includes a wide range of sustainable food types, covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. A systematic search across three online databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) for quantitative and qualitative studies resulted in 290 relevant articles for full-text analysis.</div><div>Eight dimensions of highly researched psychological states were identified: Attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, perceived barriers and resources, pro-social values, individualistic values, self-identity, and emotions. Relevant for intervention communications, we found strong evidence for the positive effect of specific attitudes (e.g., attitude towards meat alternatives) but not for more general pro-environmental attitudes. There was also strong evidence for an association between knowledge and sustainable food outcomes. Additionally, research gaps were identified, especially with regards to plant-based eating as findings indicate that some consumers hold beliefs about the healthfulness, price and needed cooking skills of plant-based diets that potentially negatively influence consumer outcomes.</div><div>Overall, this paper identifies key opportunities for policymakers and marketing professionals to encourage sustainable food outcomes among consumers, such as designing educational campaigns to address misconceptions, or creating visually appealing packaging that enhances product visibility and communicates its value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"57 ","pages":"Pages 277-291"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Thought for food”: A systematic review of how psychological state factors affect sustainable food outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Louise Glenisson,&nbsp;Lotte Hallez,&nbsp;Tim Smits\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2025.05.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given the harmful environmental, social, and economic impacts of our current food system, it is essential to develop a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively shift consumers towards more sustainable food options. Since consumers' psychological state variables are highly susceptible to change, identifying those that significantly influence sustainable food outcomes (i.e., attitudes, intentions, behaviours) is crucial for both policymakers and marketing professionals.</div><div>Therefore, this review synthesises scientific research on consumers' psychological state variables and examines how these variables influence sustainable food outcomes. In doing so, this review includes a wide range of sustainable food types, covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. A systematic search across three online databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) for quantitative and qualitative studies resulted in 290 relevant articles for full-text analysis.</div><div>Eight dimensions of highly researched psychological states were identified: Attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, perceived barriers and resources, pro-social values, individualistic values, self-identity, and emotions. Relevant for intervention communications, we found strong evidence for the positive effect of specific attitudes (e.g., attitude towards meat alternatives) but not for more general pro-environmental attitudes. There was also strong evidence for an association between knowledge and sustainable food outcomes. Additionally, research gaps were identified, especially with regards to plant-based eating as findings indicate that some consumers hold beliefs about the healthfulness, price and needed cooking skills of plant-based diets that potentially negatively influence consumer outcomes.</div><div>Overall, this paper identifies key opportunities for policymakers and marketing professionals to encourage sustainable food outcomes among consumers, such as designing educational campaigns to address misconceptions, or creating visually appealing packaging that enhances product visibility and communicates its value.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 277-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001204\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于我们当前的食品系统对环境、社会和经济的有害影响,有必要全面了解如何有效地将消费者转向更可持续的食品选择。由于消费者的心理状态变量极易发生变化,因此确定那些显著影响可持续食品结果的变量(即态度、意图、行为)对政策制定者和营销专业人员都至关重要。因此,本综述综合了消费者心理状态变量的科学研究,并考察了这些变量如何影响可持续食品的结果。在此过程中,本综述涵盖了广泛的可持续食品类型,涵盖了可持续性的环境、社会和经济层面。通过三个在线数据库(Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus)对定量和定性研究进行系统搜索,得到290篇相关文章进行全文分析。研究确定了心理状态的八个维度:态度、主观规范、感知行为控制、感知障碍和资源、亲社会价值观、个人主义价值观、自我认同和情绪。与干预沟通相关,我们发现了具体态度(例如,对肉类替代品的态度)的积极影响的有力证据,但不是更普遍的亲环境态度。还有强有力的证据表明,知识与可持续粮食产出之间存在关联。此外,研究还发现了研究空白,特别是在植物性饮食方面,因为研究结果表明,一些消费者对植物性饮食的健康、价格和所需的烹饪技巧抱有信念,这可能会对消费者的消费结果产生负面影响。总体而言,本文确定了政策制定者和营销专业人员鼓励消费者获得可持续食品成果的关键机会,例如设计教育活动以消除误解,或创建具有视觉吸引力的包装,以提高产品的知名度并传达其价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Thought for food”: A systematic review of how psychological state factors affect sustainable food outcomes
Given the harmful environmental, social, and economic impacts of our current food system, it is essential to develop a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively shift consumers towards more sustainable food options. Since consumers' psychological state variables are highly susceptible to change, identifying those that significantly influence sustainable food outcomes (i.e., attitudes, intentions, behaviours) is crucial for both policymakers and marketing professionals.
Therefore, this review synthesises scientific research on consumers' psychological state variables and examines how these variables influence sustainable food outcomes. In doing so, this review includes a wide range of sustainable food types, covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. A systematic search across three online databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) for quantitative and qualitative studies resulted in 290 relevant articles for full-text analysis.
Eight dimensions of highly researched psychological states were identified: Attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, perceived barriers and resources, pro-social values, individualistic values, self-identity, and emotions. Relevant for intervention communications, we found strong evidence for the positive effect of specific attitudes (e.g., attitude towards meat alternatives) but not for more general pro-environmental attitudes. There was also strong evidence for an association between knowledge and sustainable food outcomes. Additionally, research gaps were identified, especially with regards to plant-based eating as findings indicate that some consumers hold beliefs about the healthfulness, price and needed cooking skills of plant-based diets that potentially negatively influence consumer outcomes.
Overall, this paper identifies key opportunities for policymakers and marketing professionals to encourage sustainable food outcomes among consumers, such as designing educational campaigns to address misconceptions, or creating visually appealing packaging that enhances product visibility and communicates its value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信