{"title":"利用深度学习定量GGBS水化——与SEM-EDS图谱、PONKCS XRD和等温量热法的比较","authors":"Yan Yu, Geng Guoqing","doi":"10.1016/j.cemconres.2025.107960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantifying degree of hydration (DoH) of ground granulated blast-furnace slag in blended cement paste has long been a challenge due to its amorphous nature. In this study, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were trained on over 37,000 image pairs to automatically segment GGBS particle from backscattered electron (BSE) images and estimate its DoH. The results were compared with three conventional methods: EDS mapping, PONKCS XRD, and isothermal calorimetry. With minimal human involvement, the trained models consistently estimated GGBS DoH across varying reaction times, image qualities, cement types, substitution rates, and GGBS sources. EDS mapping, though capable with appropriate normalization, was time-consuming and sensitive to element distribution of raw GGBS and hydration products. PONKCS XRD enabled quantification of amorphous GGBS, aligning well with image analysis. Isothermal calorimetry can also track GGBS DoH if calibrated, but is less suitable for long-term reaction (DoH > 50 %) due to weak signals and extensive equipment demand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":266,"journal":{"name":"Cement and Concrete Research","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107960"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of GGBS hydration using deep learning - A comparison with SEM-EDS mapping, PONKCS XRD and isothermal calorimetry methods\",\"authors\":\"Yan Yu, Geng Guoqing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cemconres.2025.107960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Quantifying degree of hydration (DoH) of ground granulated blast-furnace slag in blended cement paste has long been a challenge due to its amorphous nature. In this study, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were trained on over 37,000 image pairs to automatically segment GGBS particle from backscattered electron (BSE) images and estimate its DoH. The results were compared with three conventional methods: EDS mapping, PONKCS XRD, and isothermal calorimetry. With minimal human involvement, the trained models consistently estimated GGBS DoH across varying reaction times, image qualities, cement types, substitution rates, and GGBS sources. EDS mapping, though capable with appropriate normalization, was time-consuming and sensitive to element distribution of raw GGBS and hydration products. PONKCS XRD enabled quantification of amorphous GGBS, aligning well with image analysis. Isothermal calorimetry can also track GGBS DoH if calibrated, but is less suitable for long-term reaction (DoH > 50 %) due to weak signals and extensive equipment demand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cement and Concrete Research\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cement and Concrete Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884625001796\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cement and Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884625001796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantification of GGBS hydration using deep learning - A comparison with SEM-EDS mapping, PONKCS XRD and isothermal calorimetry methods
Quantifying degree of hydration (DoH) of ground granulated blast-furnace slag in blended cement paste has long been a challenge due to its amorphous nature. In this study, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were trained on over 37,000 image pairs to automatically segment GGBS particle from backscattered electron (BSE) images and estimate its DoH. The results were compared with three conventional methods: EDS mapping, PONKCS XRD, and isothermal calorimetry. With minimal human involvement, the trained models consistently estimated GGBS DoH across varying reaction times, image qualities, cement types, substitution rates, and GGBS sources. EDS mapping, though capable with appropriate normalization, was time-consuming and sensitive to element distribution of raw GGBS and hydration products. PONKCS XRD enabled quantification of amorphous GGBS, aligning well with image analysis. Isothermal calorimetry can also track GGBS DoH if calibrated, but is less suitable for long-term reaction (DoH > 50 %) due to weak signals and extensive equipment demand.
期刊介绍:
Cement and Concrete Research is dedicated to publishing top-notch research on the materials science and engineering of cement, cement composites, mortars, concrete, and related materials incorporating cement or other mineral binders. The journal prioritizes reporting significant findings in research on the properties and performance of cementitious materials. It also covers novel experimental techniques, the latest analytical and modeling methods, examination and diagnosis of actual cement and concrete structures, and the exploration of potential improvements in materials.