Balasubramanian Venkatesh MD , Diego Ariel Rey PhD , David M. Evans PhD , Lijing Yao PhD , Simon Finfer MD , Rinaldo Bellomo PhD , Tiago Chedraoui Silva PhD , Jeremy Cohen PhD , Yu Qiu PhD , Wellington dos Reis Lucena PhD , Naomi Hammond PhD , John Myburgh PhD , Qiang Li PhD , Lucas Petri Damiani PhD , Anthony Devaux PhD , Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato PhD
{"title":"基于基因表达的氢化可的松在感染性休克患者中的精准应用肾上腺试验的二次分析","authors":"Balasubramanian Venkatesh MD , Diego Ariel Rey PhD , David M. Evans PhD , Lijing Yao PhD , Simon Finfer MD , Rinaldo Bellomo PhD , Tiago Chedraoui Silva PhD , Jeremy Cohen PhD , Yu Qiu PhD , Wellington dos Reis Lucena PhD , Naomi Hammond PhD , John Myburgh PhD , Qiang Li PhD , Lucas Petri Damiani PhD , Anthony Devaux PhD , Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Small observational studies suggest the effect of corticosteroids in patients with vasodilatory shock vary depending on endotypes determined by gene expression. We sought to replicate these findings in a larger cohort from a randomised clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a cross-sectional substudy of the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy In Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial, patients were classified as one of two immune endotypes using predefined gene expression signatures: immune adaptive-prevalent (IA-P) or immune innate-prevalent (IN-P). We compared the outcomes of the two endotypes using a Bayesian analysis. The primary outcome was Day-28 mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 540 patients, 267 (49.4%) were classified as IA-P and 273 (50.6%) as IN-P. In a Bayesian analysis using noninformative priors, there was no difference in the effect of hydrocortisone on 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% credible intervals [CrI] 0.72–2.87) and OR 1.39, 95% CrI 0.74–2.61, between the IA-P and IN-P groups, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with more severe shock (n = 215/540, 40%), the corresponding figures for IA-P and IN-P were 1.21, 95% CrI (0.31–4.74) and OR 0.72 (95% CrI 0.30–1.67), respectively. In the subgroup of patients with pulmonary sepsis (232/540, 43%), IA-P patients treated with hydrocortisone had increased mortality (OR 5.55, 95% CrI 1.81–21.2).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Gene expression data from patients with septic shock reveal distinct immune endotypes. There was no evidence of a heterogeneity of treatment effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in the 2 endotypes or in the subgroup with severe shock. Patients with the IA-P endotype and pulmonary sepsis appear to be harmed by corticosteroids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"27 2","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A gene expression-based approach for the precision use of hydrocortisone in septic shock patients; a secondary analysis of the ADRENAL trial\",\"authors\":\"Balasubramanian Venkatesh MD , Diego Ariel Rey PhD , David M. Evans PhD , Lijing Yao PhD , Simon Finfer MD , Rinaldo Bellomo PhD , Tiago Chedraoui Silva PhD , Jeremy Cohen PhD , Yu Qiu PhD , Wellington dos Reis Lucena PhD , Naomi Hammond PhD , John Myburgh PhD , Qiang Li PhD , Lucas Petri Damiani PhD , Anthony Devaux PhD , Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Small observational studies suggest the effect of corticosteroids in patients with vasodilatory shock vary depending on endotypes determined by gene expression. We sought to replicate these findings in a larger cohort from a randomised clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a cross-sectional substudy of the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy In Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial, patients were classified as one of two immune endotypes using predefined gene expression signatures: immune adaptive-prevalent (IA-P) or immune innate-prevalent (IN-P). We compared the outcomes of the two endotypes using a Bayesian analysis. The primary outcome was Day-28 mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 540 patients, 267 (49.4%) were classified as IA-P and 273 (50.6%) as IN-P. In a Bayesian analysis using noninformative priors, there was no difference in the effect of hydrocortisone on 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% credible intervals [CrI] 0.72–2.87) and OR 1.39, 95% CrI 0.74–2.61, between the IA-P and IN-P groups, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with more severe shock (n = 215/540, 40%), the corresponding figures for IA-P and IN-P were 1.21, 95% CrI (0.31–4.74) and OR 0.72 (95% CrI 0.30–1.67), respectively. In the subgroup of patients with pulmonary sepsis (232/540, 43%), IA-P patients treated with hydrocortisone had increased mortality (OR 5.55, 95% CrI 1.81–21.2).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Gene expression data from patients with septic shock reveal distinct immune endotypes. There was no evidence of a heterogeneity of treatment effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in the 2 endotypes or in the subgroup with severe shock. Patients with the IA-P endotype and pulmonary sepsis appear to be harmed by corticosteroids.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000134\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A gene expression-based approach for the precision use of hydrocortisone in septic shock patients; a secondary analysis of the ADRENAL trial
Background
Small observational studies suggest the effect of corticosteroids in patients with vasodilatory shock vary depending on endotypes determined by gene expression. We sought to replicate these findings in a larger cohort from a randomised clinical trial.
Methods
In a cross-sectional substudy of the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy In Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial, patients were classified as one of two immune endotypes using predefined gene expression signatures: immune adaptive-prevalent (IA-P) or immune innate-prevalent (IN-P). We compared the outcomes of the two endotypes using a Bayesian analysis. The primary outcome was Day-28 mortality.
Findings
Of 540 patients, 267 (49.4%) were classified as IA-P and 273 (50.6%) as IN-P. In a Bayesian analysis using noninformative priors, there was no difference in the effect of hydrocortisone on 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% credible intervals [CrI] 0.72–2.87) and OR 1.39, 95% CrI 0.74–2.61, between the IA-P and IN-P groups, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with more severe shock (n = 215/540, 40%), the corresponding figures for IA-P and IN-P were 1.21, 95% CrI (0.31–4.74) and OR 0.72 (95% CrI 0.30–1.67), respectively. In the subgroup of patients with pulmonary sepsis (232/540, 43%), IA-P patients treated with hydrocortisone had increased mortality (OR 5.55, 95% CrI 1.81–21.2).
Interpretation
Gene expression data from patients with septic shock reveal distinct immune endotypes. There was no evidence of a heterogeneity of treatment effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in the 2 endotypes or in the subgroup with severe shock. Patients with the IA-P endotype and pulmonary sepsis appear to be harmed by corticosteroids.
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.