在水-能源-食物-生态系统关系框架下,利益相关者系统参与环境决策的综合方法

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chrysaida-Aliki Papadopoulou , Ioannis M. Kourtis , Chrysi Laspidou , Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis , Maria P. Papadopoulou
{"title":"在水-能源-食物-生态系统关系框架下,利益相关者系统参与环境决策的综合方法","authors":"Chrysaida-Aliki Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;Ioannis M. Kourtis ,&nbsp;Chrysi Laspidou ,&nbsp;Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis ,&nbsp;Maria P. Papadopoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ‘nexus’ approach is a promising exemplar underpinning systemic thinking and advancing integrated resource use. In this context, stakeholder engagement comprises a significant challenge as stakeholders are affecting and affected by resource availability and exploitation. This paper focuses on the operationalisation/systematisation of abstract concepts expressed during participatory workshops and its contribution to the efficient management of the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) nexus by supporting the design of future policies and integrated solutions. A novel methodological framework is presented combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Multicriteria Analysis of Policies method (MULTIPOL) in order to seek solutions and build innovative policy options. AHP and MULTIPOL complement each other as the first indicates <em>which</em> solutions are most effective while the latter indicates <em>how</em> such solutions may be implemented by adopting relevant policies. The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated in the environmental management of a transboundary river basin. Results show that the suggested methodological framework is robust, applicable to wider contexts and spatial scales, and coherent. The construction of (new) green-gray infrastructures (irrigation infrastructures, Nature-based Solutions (NbS), fish corridor, reclamation works, energy infrastructures) was classified as the most effective solution while protection of water quality, minimisation of water losses, limitation of flood risks, ecosystems preservation and the adoption of eco-friendly/multi-functional patterns of spatial development constitute important priorities for (transboundary) river basins. The analysis adds to the current literature addressing qualitative research on the WEFE nexus and the systematisation of stakeholder input by employing qualitative/quantitative methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101268"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated methodology for systematic stakeholder engagement in environmental decision-making under the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems nexus framework\",\"authors\":\"Chrysaida-Aliki Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;Ioannis M. Kourtis ,&nbsp;Chrysi Laspidou ,&nbsp;Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis ,&nbsp;Maria P. Papadopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ‘nexus’ approach is a promising exemplar underpinning systemic thinking and advancing integrated resource use. In this context, stakeholder engagement comprises a significant challenge as stakeholders are affecting and affected by resource availability and exploitation. This paper focuses on the operationalisation/systematisation of abstract concepts expressed during participatory workshops and its contribution to the efficient management of the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) nexus by supporting the design of future policies and integrated solutions. A novel methodological framework is presented combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Multicriteria Analysis of Policies method (MULTIPOL) in order to seek solutions and build innovative policy options. AHP and MULTIPOL complement each other as the first indicates <em>which</em> solutions are most effective while the latter indicates <em>how</em> such solutions may be implemented by adopting relevant policies. The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated in the environmental management of a transboundary river basin. Results show that the suggested methodological framework is robust, applicable to wider contexts and spatial scales, and coherent. The construction of (new) green-gray infrastructures (irrigation infrastructures, Nature-based Solutions (NbS), fish corridor, reclamation works, energy infrastructures) was classified as the most effective solution while protection of water quality, minimisation of water losses, limitation of flood risks, ecosystems preservation and the adoption of eco-friendly/multi-functional patterns of spatial development constitute important priorities for (transboundary) river basins. The analysis adds to the current literature addressing qualitative research on the WEFE nexus and the systematisation of stakeholder input by employing qualitative/quantitative methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001344\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“联系”方法是支持系统思考和推进综合资源利用的一个有前途的范例。在这种情况下,利益相关者的参与构成了一项重大挑战,因为利益相关者正在影响资源的可用性和开发,并受其影响。本文的重点是在参与式研讨会上表达的抽象概念的操作化/系统化,以及通过支持未来政策和综合解决方案的设计,它对水-能源-食物-生态系统(WEFE)关系的有效管理的贡献。结合层次分析法(AHP)和多标准政策分析法(MULTIPOL),提出了一种新的方法框架,以寻求解决方案并建立创新的政策选择。AHP和MULTIPOL相辅相成,前者指出哪些解决办法最有效,后者指出如何通过采取相关政策来执行这些解决办法。在一个跨界河流流域的环境管理中证明了所提出的方法的应用。结果表明,建议的方法框架是稳健的,适用于更广泛的背景和空间尺度,并具有连贯性。(新的)绿灰基础设施(灌溉基础设施、基于自然的解决方案(NbS)、鱼类走廊、填海工程、能源基础设施)的建设被列为最有效的解决方案,而保护水质、尽量减少水损失、限制洪水风险、保护生态系统和采用生态友好/多功能的空间发展模式则是(跨界)河流流域的重要优先事项。该分析增加了对WEFE关系进行定性研究的现有文献,并通过采用定性/定量方法将利益相关者的投入系统化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrated methodology for systematic stakeholder engagement in environmental decision-making under the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems nexus framework
The ‘nexus’ approach is a promising exemplar underpinning systemic thinking and advancing integrated resource use. In this context, stakeholder engagement comprises a significant challenge as stakeholders are affecting and affected by resource availability and exploitation. This paper focuses on the operationalisation/systematisation of abstract concepts expressed during participatory workshops and its contribution to the efficient management of the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) nexus by supporting the design of future policies and integrated solutions. A novel methodological framework is presented combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Multicriteria Analysis of Policies method (MULTIPOL) in order to seek solutions and build innovative policy options. AHP and MULTIPOL complement each other as the first indicates which solutions are most effective while the latter indicates how such solutions may be implemented by adopting relevant policies. The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated in the environmental management of a transboundary river basin. Results show that the suggested methodological framework is robust, applicable to wider contexts and spatial scales, and coherent. The construction of (new) green-gray infrastructures (irrigation infrastructures, Nature-based Solutions (NbS), fish corridor, reclamation works, energy infrastructures) was classified as the most effective solution while protection of water quality, minimisation of water losses, limitation of flood risks, ecosystems preservation and the adoption of eco-friendly/multi-functional patterns of spatial development constitute important priorities for (transboundary) river basins. The analysis adds to the current literature addressing qualitative research on the WEFE nexus and the systematisation of stakeholder input by employing qualitative/quantitative methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信