组合思维与正义化:正义化组合的理论基石

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kaifeng Zhao, Kevin Lo
{"title":"组合思维与正义化:正义化组合的理论基石","authors":"Kaifeng Zhao,&nbsp;Kevin Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is important for just transition studies to go beyond the idealistic approach grounded in philosophical concepts such as distributive, procedural, and recognition justice to attend to the nuances and messiness of reality. To this end, this theoretical paper reconceptualizes just transition through the lens of assemblage thinking. Assemblage thinking, with its emphasis on relationality, emergence, and heterogeneity, provides a useful lens for understanding just transitions as multi-dimensional, dynamic, spontaneous, and non-predetermined phenomena. We propose four theoretical building blocks to conceptualize just transitions as assemblages: (1) multiplicity of relations; (2) spatiotemporal embeddedness and dynamic processuality; (3) desire-driven labor and non-human agency; and (4) emergence and uncertainty. Taken together, these building blocks demonstrate the value of the assemblage approach in capturing how just transition practices emerge, evolve, and dissolve, as well as how power operates through these diverse processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assemblage thinking and just transition: Theoretical building blocks of just transition assemblage\",\"authors\":\"Kaifeng Zhao,&nbsp;Kevin Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It is important for just transition studies to go beyond the idealistic approach grounded in philosophical concepts such as distributive, procedural, and recognition justice to attend to the nuances and messiness of reality. To this end, this theoretical paper reconceptualizes just transition through the lens of assemblage thinking. Assemblage thinking, with its emphasis on relationality, emergence, and heterogeneity, provides a useful lens for understanding just transitions as multi-dimensional, dynamic, spontaneous, and non-predetermined phenomena. We propose four theoretical building blocks to conceptualize just transitions as assemblages: (1) multiplicity of relations; (2) spatiotemporal embeddedness and dynamic processuality; (3) desire-driven labor and non-human agency; and (4) emergence and uncertainty. Taken together, these building blocks demonstrate the value of the assemblage approach in capturing how just transition practices emerge, evolve, and dissolve, as well as how power operates through these diverse processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000887\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于公正过渡研究来说,重要的是要超越以哲学概念为基础的理想主义方法,如分配、程序和承认正义,以关注现实的细微差别和混乱。为此,本文从组合思维的角度对过渡进行了重新定义。组合思维强调关联性、涌现性和异质性,为理解作为多维、动态、自发和非预定现象的过渡提供了一个有用的视角。我们提出了四个理论基石来将过渡概念化为集合:(1)关系的多样性;(2)时空嵌入性和动态过程性;(3)欲望驱动的劳动和非人类的代理;(4)涌现性和不确定性。总的来说,这些构建块展示了组合方法的价值,它捕获了刚刚的产品化实践是如何出现、发展和解散的,以及权力是如何通过这些不同的过程运作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assemblage thinking and just transition: Theoretical building blocks of just transition assemblage
It is important for just transition studies to go beyond the idealistic approach grounded in philosophical concepts such as distributive, procedural, and recognition justice to attend to the nuances and messiness of reality. To this end, this theoretical paper reconceptualizes just transition through the lens of assemblage thinking. Assemblage thinking, with its emphasis on relationality, emergence, and heterogeneity, provides a useful lens for understanding just transitions as multi-dimensional, dynamic, spontaneous, and non-predetermined phenomena. We propose four theoretical building blocks to conceptualize just transitions as assemblages: (1) multiplicity of relations; (2) spatiotemporal embeddedness and dynamic processuality; (3) desire-driven labor and non-human agency; and (4) emergence and uncertainty. Taken together, these building blocks demonstrate the value of the assemblage approach in capturing how just transition practices emerge, evolve, and dissolve, as well as how power operates through these diverse processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信