{"title":"基于经济效益的交通运输碳排放责任分配","authors":"Liang Zhao, Zhenggang He","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reasonable allocation of carbon emission responsibility in the transportation sector is vital for developing effective low-carbon transportation policies. This study introduces the principle of Economic Benefit Sharing Responsibility (EBSR), which incorporates economic benefits into the allocation process. Using data from city-level and provincial-level MRIO tables and carbon emission statistics, it equitably allocates transportation carbon emissions across 309 Chinese cities. The findings show that EBSR effectively balances transportation carbon responsibilities by integrating the perspectives of production-based accounting (PBA) and consumption-based accounting (CBA). EBSR demonstrates that industrial hubs like Shanghai bear higher producer responsibilities, while consumption-driven cities like Beijing take on greater consumer responsibilities. Compared to PBA and CBA, EBSR provides a more equitable framework for allocating carbon responsibilities aligned with cities’ economic roles. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt EBSR to balance emission responsibility, guide elasticity-based policies, and advance equitable, low-carbon transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104850"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allocation of responsibility for transportation carbon emissions based on economic benefits\",\"authors\":\"Liang Zhao, Zhenggang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The reasonable allocation of carbon emission responsibility in the transportation sector is vital for developing effective low-carbon transportation policies. This study introduces the principle of Economic Benefit Sharing Responsibility (EBSR), which incorporates economic benefits into the allocation process. Using data from city-level and provincial-level MRIO tables and carbon emission statistics, it equitably allocates transportation carbon emissions across 309 Chinese cities. The findings show that EBSR effectively balances transportation carbon responsibilities by integrating the perspectives of production-based accounting (PBA) and consumption-based accounting (CBA). EBSR demonstrates that industrial hubs like Shanghai bear higher producer responsibilities, while consumption-driven cities like Beijing take on greater consumer responsibilities. Compared to PBA and CBA, EBSR provides a more equitable framework for allocating carbon responsibilities aligned with cities’ economic roles. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt EBSR to balance emission responsibility, guide elasticity-based policies, and advance equitable, low-carbon transportation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002603\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002603","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Allocation of responsibility for transportation carbon emissions based on economic benefits
The reasonable allocation of carbon emission responsibility in the transportation sector is vital for developing effective low-carbon transportation policies. This study introduces the principle of Economic Benefit Sharing Responsibility (EBSR), which incorporates economic benefits into the allocation process. Using data from city-level and provincial-level MRIO tables and carbon emission statistics, it equitably allocates transportation carbon emissions across 309 Chinese cities. The findings show that EBSR effectively balances transportation carbon responsibilities by integrating the perspectives of production-based accounting (PBA) and consumption-based accounting (CBA). EBSR demonstrates that industrial hubs like Shanghai bear higher producer responsibilities, while consumption-driven cities like Beijing take on greater consumer responsibilities. Compared to PBA and CBA, EBSR provides a more equitable framework for allocating carbon responsibilities aligned with cities’ economic roles. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt EBSR to balance emission responsibility, guide elasticity-based policies, and advance equitable, low-carbon transportation.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.