基于经济效益的交通运输碳排放责任分配

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Liang Zhao, Zhenggang He
{"title":"基于经济效益的交通运输碳排放责任分配","authors":"Liang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenggang He","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reasonable allocation of carbon emission responsibility in the transportation sector is vital for developing effective low-carbon transportation policies. This study introduces the principle of Economic Benefit Sharing Responsibility (EBSR), which incorporates economic benefits into the allocation process. Using data from city-level and provincial-level MRIO tables and carbon emission statistics, it equitably allocates transportation carbon emissions across 309 Chinese cities. The findings show that EBSR effectively balances transportation carbon responsibilities by integrating the perspectives of production-based accounting (PBA) and consumption-based accounting (CBA). EBSR demonstrates that industrial hubs like Shanghai bear higher producer responsibilities, while consumption-driven cities like Beijing take on greater consumer responsibilities. Compared to PBA and CBA, EBSR provides a more equitable framework for allocating carbon responsibilities aligned with cities’ economic roles. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt EBSR to balance emission responsibility, guide elasticity-based policies, and advance equitable, low-carbon transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104850"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allocation of responsibility for transportation carbon emissions based on economic benefits\",\"authors\":\"Liang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenggang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The reasonable allocation of carbon emission responsibility in the transportation sector is vital for developing effective low-carbon transportation policies. This study introduces the principle of Economic Benefit Sharing Responsibility (EBSR), which incorporates economic benefits into the allocation process. Using data from city-level and provincial-level MRIO tables and carbon emission statistics, it equitably allocates transportation carbon emissions across 309 Chinese cities. The findings show that EBSR effectively balances transportation carbon responsibilities by integrating the perspectives of production-based accounting (PBA) and consumption-based accounting (CBA). EBSR demonstrates that industrial hubs like Shanghai bear higher producer responsibilities, while consumption-driven cities like Beijing take on greater consumer responsibilities. Compared to PBA and CBA, EBSR provides a more equitable framework for allocating carbon responsibilities aligned with cities’ economic roles. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt EBSR to balance emission responsibility, guide elasticity-based policies, and advance equitable, low-carbon transportation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002603\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002603","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通运输部门碳排放责任的合理分配对于制定有效的低碳交通政策至关重要。本研究引入经济利益共享责任原则,将经济利益纳入分配过程。利用市级和省级MRIO表的数据和碳排放统计数据,它公平地分配了309个中国城市的交通碳排放。研究结果表明,EBSR通过整合以生产为基础的核算(PBA)和以消费为基础的核算(CBA)的视角,有效地平衡了运输碳责任。EBSR表明,像上海这样的工业中心承担着更高的生产者责任,而像北京这样的消费驱动型城市承担着更大的消费者责任。与PBA和CBA相比,EBSR提供了一个更公平的框架来分配与城市经济角色相一致的碳责任。鼓励政策制定者采用EBSR来平衡排放责任,指导基于弹性的政策,推进公平的低碳交通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Allocation of responsibility for transportation carbon emissions based on economic benefits
The reasonable allocation of carbon emission responsibility in the transportation sector is vital for developing effective low-carbon transportation policies. This study introduces the principle of Economic Benefit Sharing Responsibility (EBSR), which incorporates economic benefits into the allocation process. Using data from city-level and provincial-level MRIO tables and carbon emission statistics, it equitably allocates transportation carbon emissions across 309 Chinese cities. The findings show that EBSR effectively balances transportation carbon responsibilities by integrating the perspectives of production-based accounting (PBA) and consumption-based accounting (CBA). EBSR demonstrates that industrial hubs like Shanghai bear higher producer responsibilities, while consumption-driven cities like Beijing take on greater consumer responsibilities. Compared to PBA and CBA, EBSR provides a more equitable framework for allocating carbon responsibilities aligned with cities’ economic roles. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt EBSR to balance emission responsibility, guide elasticity-based policies, and advance equitable, low-carbon transportation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
314
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信