脂蛋白(a)和冠状动脉疾病:需要普遍筛查-基于病例的回顾

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nguyen Yen Nhi Ngo, Chloé Davidson Villavaso, Chisom Joan Orakwue, William Zachary Rowalt, Madhur Roberts, Keith C. Ferdinand
{"title":"脂蛋白(a)和冠状动脉疾病:需要普遍筛查-基于病例的回顾","authors":"Nguyen Yen Nhi Ngo,&nbsp;Chloé Davidson Villavaso,&nbsp;Chisom Joan Orakwue,&nbsp;William Zachary Rowalt,&nbsp;Madhur Roberts,&nbsp;Keith C. Ferdinand","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), especially coronary artery disease (CAD), remains the leading cause of death worldwide, with several well-identified risk factors. This case report presents a premenopausal female with low calculated ASCVD risk, hypertension, elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and clinically significant CAD.</div></div><div><h3>Case report</h3><div>A 44-year-old premenopausal White female with controlled stage 2 hypertension, and overall low calculated 10-year ASCVD risk, was found to have severe CAD. She presented to the clinic with worsening chest discomfort during exertion and was diagnosed with a heavily calcified proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis, necessitating percutaneous coronary intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The global prevalence of elevated Lp(a) &gt;50 mg/dL is around 1.43 billion. Elevated lipoprotein(a) is now recognized, based on the preponderance of the evidence, by several international scientific statements as an independent risk factor for ASCVD, including CAD. Nevertheless, the current 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) multi-society guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol only classifies Lp(a) as a risk enhancer. This recommendation, along with the lack of approved pharmacotherapy has contributed to limited testing in current United States clinical practice (&lt;1 % for the general population). Furthermore, the inadequate assessment of Lp(a) may lead to an underestimation of ASCVD risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case highlights the shortcomings of inadequate assessment of Lp(a) leading to the underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Accordingly, with multiple recent international scientific statements, clinicians should universally screen for elevated Lp(a). In the future, investigational therapies for lowering Lp(a) may be crucial for improving patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipoprotein(a) and coronary artery disease: The need for universal screening – A case-based review\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen Yen Nhi Ngo,&nbsp;Chloé Davidson Villavaso,&nbsp;Chisom Joan Orakwue,&nbsp;William Zachary Rowalt,&nbsp;Madhur Roberts,&nbsp;Keith C. Ferdinand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), especially coronary artery disease (CAD), remains the leading cause of death worldwide, with several well-identified risk factors. This case report presents a premenopausal female with low calculated ASCVD risk, hypertension, elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and clinically significant CAD.</div></div><div><h3>Case report</h3><div>A 44-year-old premenopausal White female with controlled stage 2 hypertension, and overall low calculated 10-year ASCVD risk, was found to have severe CAD. She presented to the clinic with worsening chest discomfort during exertion and was diagnosed with a heavily calcified proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis, necessitating percutaneous coronary intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The global prevalence of elevated Lp(a) &gt;50 mg/dL is around 1.43 billion. Elevated lipoprotein(a) is now recognized, based on the preponderance of the evidence, by several international scientific statements as an independent risk factor for ASCVD, including CAD. Nevertheless, the current 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) multi-society guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol only classifies Lp(a) as a risk enhancer. This recommendation, along with the lack of approved pharmacotherapy has contributed to limited testing in current United States clinical practice (&lt;1 % for the general population). Furthermore, the inadequate assessment of Lp(a) may lead to an underestimation of ASCVD risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This case highlights the shortcomings of inadequate assessment of Lp(a) leading to the underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Accordingly, with multiple recent international scientific statements, clinicians should universally screen for elevated Lp(a). In the future, investigational therapies for lowering Lp(a) may be crucial for improving patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602225000631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602225000631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD),特别是冠状动脉疾病(CAD),仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,有几个明确的危险因素。本病例报告为绝经前女性,ASCVD计算风险低,高血压,脂蛋白升高(a) [Lp(a)],伴有临床显著的CAD。病例报告:一名44岁绝经前白人女性,2期高血压得到控制,10年ASCVD总体计算风险较低,被发现患有严重的CAD。患者在运动时胸部不适加重,被诊断为左前降支近端严重钙化狭窄,需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。全球Lp(a)升高50 mg/dL的患病率约为14.3亿。目前,基于大量证据,一些国际科学声明认为,脂蛋白(a)升高是包括冠心病在内的ASCVD的独立危险因素。然而,目前2018年美国心脏病学会(ACC)和美国心脏协会(AHA)关于血液胆固醇管理的多协会指南仅将Lp(a)分类为风险增强因子。这一建议,加上缺乏批准的药物治疗,导致目前美国临床实践中检测有限(普通人群1%)。此外,Lp(a)评估的不充分可能导致ASCVD风险的低估。结论本病例突出了Lp(a)评估不充分导致心血管风险低估的缺点。因此,根据最近的多项国际科学声明,临床医生应该普遍筛查Lp(a)升高。在未来,降低Lp(a)的研究性治疗可能是改善患者预后的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lipoprotein(a) and coronary artery disease: The need for universal screening – A case-based review

Introduction

Atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), especially coronary artery disease (CAD), remains the leading cause of death worldwide, with several well-identified risk factors. This case report presents a premenopausal female with low calculated ASCVD risk, hypertension, elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and clinically significant CAD.

Case report

A 44-year-old premenopausal White female with controlled stage 2 hypertension, and overall low calculated 10-year ASCVD risk, was found to have severe CAD. She presented to the clinic with worsening chest discomfort during exertion and was diagnosed with a heavily calcified proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis, necessitating percutaneous coronary intervention.

Discussion

The global prevalence of elevated Lp(a) >50 mg/dL is around 1.43 billion. Elevated lipoprotein(a) is now recognized, based on the preponderance of the evidence, by several international scientific statements as an independent risk factor for ASCVD, including CAD. Nevertheless, the current 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) multi-society guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol only classifies Lp(a) as a risk enhancer. This recommendation, along with the lack of approved pharmacotherapy has contributed to limited testing in current United States clinical practice (<1 % for the general population). Furthermore, the inadequate assessment of Lp(a) may lead to an underestimation of ASCVD risk.

Conclusion

This case highlights the shortcomings of inadequate assessment of Lp(a) leading to the underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Accordingly, with multiple recent international scientific statements, clinicians should universally screen for elevated Lp(a). In the future, investigational therapies for lowering Lp(a) may be crucial for improving patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信