{"title":"在澳大利亚昆士兰为辅助技术服务提供共同设计解决方案","authors":"Tammy Aplin, Louise Gustafsson, Christy Hogan, Michelle Owens, Hayden Boyd, Tenelle Hodson, Camila Shirota, Michelle Bissett","doi":"10.1111/hex.70322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Assistive technology (AT) is an essential element of universal healthcare, with a lack of access to AT a worldwide problem. Collaboration between key stakeholders is essential to understand the provision challenges and to generate possible solutions. In this paper, we describe the involvement of a stakeholder group in a participatory action research process aimed to interrogate and generate solutions for the AT sector in one Australian state.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participatory action research with a stakeholder group (<i>n</i> = 14) comprising AT users, therapists experienced in providing AT services, representatives from injury or disability support schemes that manage AT provision, AT experts and researchers and representatives from statewide rehabilitation and allied organisations. Four action cycles were conducted to (1) develop the research design and methods, (2) conduct the research and interrogate the findings, (3) generate and prioritise solutions and (4) develop an action plan for the AT sector.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The stakeholder group influenced the design and conduct of a needs assessment (Action Cycles 1 and 2) and collaborated at a solution-building workshop to generate 10 recommended solutions (Action Cycle 3). In Action Cycle 4, AT users (<i>n</i> = 2) in consultation with AT experts (<i>n</i> = 2) led the finalisation of solutions and developed the following action plan recommendations: the development of an AT hub, AT mentor training and a training and credentialing system for AT advisors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Applying participatory action research, with leadership and collaboration from key stakeholders across the AT sector, can enrich processes and outcomes in AT-related policy research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Consultation</h3>\n \n <p>A stakeholder group was critical to the design and conduct of the needs assessment and was a leader in the collaborative solution generation and prioritisation process, and the development of an action plan.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70322","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codesigning Solutions for Assistive Technology Service Provision in Queensland, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Tammy Aplin, Louise Gustafsson, Christy Hogan, Michelle Owens, Hayden Boyd, Tenelle Hodson, Camila Shirota, Michelle Bissett\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Assistive technology (AT) is an essential element of universal healthcare, with a lack of access to AT a worldwide problem. Collaboration between key stakeholders is essential to understand the provision challenges and to generate possible solutions. In this paper, we describe the involvement of a stakeholder group in a participatory action research process aimed to interrogate and generate solutions for the AT sector in one Australian state.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participatory action research with a stakeholder group (<i>n</i> = 14) comprising AT users, therapists experienced in providing AT services, representatives from injury or disability support schemes that manage AT provision, AT experts and researchers and representatives from statewide rehabilitation and allied organisations. Four action cycles were conducted to (1) develop the research design and methods, (2) conduct the research and interrogate the findings, (3) generate and prioritise solutions and (4) develop an action plan for the AT sector.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The stakeholder group influenced the design and conduct of a needs assessment (Action Cycles 1 and 2) and collaborated at a solution-building workshop to generate 10 recommended solutions (Action Cycle 3). In Action Cycle 4, AT users (<i>n</i> = 2) in consultation with AT experts (<i>n</i> = 2) led the finalisation of solutions and developed the following action plan recommendations: the development of an AT hub, AT mentor training and a training and credentialing system for AT advisors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Applying participatory action research, with leadership and collaboration from key stakeholders across the AT sector, can enrich processes and outcomes in AT-related policy research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Consultation</h3>\\n \\n <p>A stakeholder group was critical to the design and conduct of the needs assessment and was a leader in the collaborative solution generation and prioritisation process, and the development of an action plan.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70322\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70322\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Codesigning Solutions for Assistive Technology Service Provision in Queensland, Australia
Introduction
Assistive technology (AT) is an essential element of universal healthcare, with a lack of access to AT a worldwide problem. Collaboration between key stakeholders is essential to understand the provision challenges and to generate possible solutions. In this paper, we describe the involvement of a stakeholder group in a participatory action research process aimed to interrogate and generate solutions for the AT sector in one Australian state.
Methods
Participatory action research with a stakeholder group (n = 14) comprising AT users, therapists experienced in providing AT services, representatives from injury or disability support schemes that manage AT provision, AT experts and researchers and representatives from statewide rehabilitation and allied organisations. Four action cycles were conducted to (1) develop the research design and methods, (2) conduct the research and interrogate the findings, (3) generate and prioritise solutions and (4) develop an action plan for the AT sector.
Results
The stakeholder group influenced the design and conduct of a needs assessment (Action Cycles 1 and 2) and collaborated at a solution-building workshop to generate 10 recommended solutions (Action Cycle 3). In Action Cycle 4, AT users (n = 2) in consultation with AT experts (n = 2) led the finalisation of solutions and developed the following action plan recommendations: the development of an AT hub, AT mentor training and a training and credentialing system for AT advisors.
Conclusions
Applying participatory action research, with leadership and collaboration from key stakeholders across the AT sector, can enrich processes and outcomes in AT-related policy research.
Patient or Public Consultation
A stakeholder group was critical to the design and conduct of the needs assessment and was a leader in the collaborative solution generation and prioritisation process, and the development of an action plan.
期刊介绍：
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
