唱名投票可能对高风险的投票有用

{"title":"唱名投票可能对高风险的投票有用","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ban.31827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For most nonprofit board meetings, simple voice votes or show-of-hands are sufficient to move forward with a group decision. But for some votes—in more critical or controversial matters—a more formal process might be called for that provides clarity and accountability on how each board member votes. In these cases, the groups should consider a roll call vote, which not only documents individual votes but also facilitates a clear and organized decision-making process, according to Josh Palmer of board management consultancy OnBoard.</p>","PeriodicalId":100192,"journal":{"name":"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only","volume":"41 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roll call votes might prove useful for high-stakes votes\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ban.31827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For most nonprofit board meetings, simple voice votes or show-of-hands are sufficient to move forward with a group decision. But for some votes—in more critical or controversial matters—a more formal process might be called for that provides clarity and accountability on how each board member votes. In these cases, the groups should consider a roll call vote, which not only documents individual votes but also facilitates a clear and organized decision-making process, according to Josh Palmer of board management consultancy OnBoard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only\",\"volume\":\"41 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ban.31827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ban.31827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于大多数非营利组织的董事会来说,简单的口头投票或举手表决就足以推动集体决策。但对于一些更关键或更有争议的投票,可能需要一个更正式的程序,以提供每个董事会成员如何投票的清晰度和问责制。董事会管理咨询公司OnBoard的乔希•帕尔默(Josh Palmer)表示,在这种情况下,集团应该考虑进行唱名投票,这不仅记录了个人的投票,还有助于清晰、有组织的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Roll call votes might prove useful for high-stakes votes

For most nonprofit board meetings, simple voice votes or show-of-hands are sufficient to move forward with a group decision. But for some votes—in more critical or controversial matters—a more formal process might be called for that provides clarity and accountability on how each board member votes. In these cases, the groups should consider a roll call vote, which not only documents individual votes but also facilitates a clear and organized decision-making process, according to Josh Palmer of board management consultancy OnBoard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信