{"title":"唱名投票可能对高风险的投票有用","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ban.31827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For most nonprofit board meetings, simple voice votes or show-of-hands are sufficient to move forward with a group decision. But for some votes—in more critical or controversial matters—a more formal process might be called for that provides clarity and accountability on how each board member votes. In these cases, the groups should consider a roll call vote, which not only documents individual votes but also facilitates a clear and organized decision-making process, according to Josh Palmer of board management consultancy OnBoard.</p>","PeriodicalId":100192,"journal":{"name":"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only","volume":"41 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roll call votes might prove useful for high-stakes votes\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ban.31827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For most nonprofit board meetings, simple voice votes or show-of-hands are sufficient to move forward with a group decision. But for some votes—in more critical or controversial matters—a more formal process might be called for that provides clarity and accountability on how each board member votes. In these cases, the groups should consider a roll call vote, which not only documents individual votes but also facilitates a clear and organized decision-making process, according to Josh Palmer of board management consultancy OnBoard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only\",\"volume\":\"41 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ban.31827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Board & Administrator for Administrators Only","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ban.31827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Roll call votes might prove useful for high-stakes votes
For most nonprofit board meetings, simple voice votes or show-of-hands are sufficient to move forward with a group decision. But for some votes—in more critical or controversial matters—a more formal process might be called for that provides clarity and accountability on how each board member votes. In these cases, the groups should consider a roll call vote, which not only documents individual votes but also facilitates a clear and organized decision-making process, according to Josh Palmer of board management consultancy OnBoard.