利用HART和FRAM框架识别医院建筑环境危害:临床模拟研究

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Natália Ransolin, Colleen Cheek, Matthew Wooler, Nick Towle, Robyn Clay-Williams
{"title":"利用HART和FRAM框架识别医院建筑环境危害:临床模拟研究","authors":"Natália Ransolin,&nbsp;Colleen Cheek,&nbsp;Matthew Wooler,&nbsp;Nick Towle,&nbsp;Robyn Clay-Williams","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video-recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10-s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study\",\"authors\":\"Natália Ransolin,&nbsp;Colleen Cheek,&nbsp;Matthew Wooler,&nbsp;Nick Towle,&nbsp;Robyn Clay-Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hfm.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video-recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10-s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已采用卫生环境工作的现场模拟,以主动识别危害并管理与建筑环境有关的风险。特别是,录像模拟允许对各种情况进行反复审查和汇报。本研究评估了BE危害对临床表现和患者预后的影响,该研究基于视频现场模拟BE被占用前的紧急情况。在澳大利亚急诊科(ED)迄今为止新的复苏室中,有12名医务和护理人员参加了四次回顾性现场模拟和两种紧急情况(心室颤动和急性心肌梗死)的汇报会议。数据由独立临床和HFE研究人员根据危害评估补救工具(HART)和功能共振分析方法(FRAM)进行分析。每个10秒的视频片段与FRAM功能(即执行的任务)、方面(例如输入、输出、先决条件)、FRAM输出的代理和可变性相关联,以根据HART类别(即滑/绊倒/跌倒/受伤风险;接触病人或设备受阻;阻塞的道路;低能见度;感染风险)。HART分类用于识别BE潜在和主动危害,并将其转化为由次优BE条件引起的FRAM函数输出的潜在和实际变量。制定了每种紧急情况的FRAM模型,确定了45种BE危害,并将向环境评估局提出的18项建议与FRAM功能的先决条件方面联系起来,作为减轻产出变化的一项战略。我们的两个主要贡献是:(1)结合FRAM和HART作为一种方法;(2)通过临床模拟来识别BE危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study

In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video-recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10-s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信