Natália Ransolin, Colleen Cheek, Matthew Wooler, Nick Towle, Robyn Clay-Williams
{"title":"利用HART和FRAM框架识别医院建筑环境危害:临床模拟研究","authors":"Natália Ransolin, Colleen Cheek, Matthew Wooler, Nick Towle, Robyn Clay-Williams","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video-recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10-s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study\",\"authors\":\"Natália Ransolin, Colleen Cheek, Matthew Wooler, Nick Towle, Robyn Clay-Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hfm.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video-recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10-s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study
In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video-recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10-s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.