印度南部沿海人群中有和没有根状龋的成人唾液分析-一项横断面分析研究。

Jyothi Shetty, Mithra N Hegde, N Suchetha Kumari, Neevan D'Souza, Shilpa S Shetty
{"title":"印度南部沿海人群中有和没有根状龋的成人唾液分析-一项横断面分析研究。","authors":"Jyothi Shetty, Mithra N Hegde, N Suchetha Kumari, Neevan D'Souza, Shilpa S Shetty","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_791_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, and glycoproteins levels in root caries-active and root caries (RC)-free subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Outpatient Department of A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences with a sample size of 94 subjects. After screening of the subjects, the salivary samples were collected from 47 RC-active and 47 RC-free subjects for analysis. The following parameters were assessed - salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, levels of salivary amylase, mucin, albumin, globulin, and total salivary protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was significantly higher in the RC group compared to the non-RC group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pH between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.050). Median buffer capacity and flow rate were higher in the non-RC group compared to the RC group. There was a significant difference in buffer capacity (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and flow rate (<i>P</i> = 0.001) between the RC and non-RC groups. There was no significant difference in total protein level (<i>P</i> = 0.285) in the non-RC and RC groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated reduced salivary flow and buffer capacity, along with lower albumin levels and higher mucin-1 concentrations in individuals with RC. The salivary analysis provides a noninvasive and effective approach to assess RC risk. Incorporating salivary diagnostics into routine dental check-ups, particularly for older patients, can help in tailoring preventive care and treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 5","pages":"406-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary analysis in adults with and without root caries in South coastal population of India - A cross-sectional analytical study.\",\"authors\":\"Jyothi Shetty, Mithra N Hegde, N Suchetha Kumari, Neevan D'Souza, Shilpa S Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_791_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, and glycoproteins levels in root caries-active and root caries (RC)-free subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Outpatient Department of A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences with a sample size of 94 subjects. After screening of the subjects, the salivary samples were collected from 47 RC-active and 47 RC-free subjects for analysis. The following parameters were assessed - salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, levels of salivary amylase, mucin, albumin, globulin, and total salivary protein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was significantly higher in the RC group compared to the non-RC group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pH between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.050). Median buffer capacity and flow rate were higher in the non-RC group compared to the RC group. There was a significant difference in buffer capacity (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and flow rate (<i>P</i> = 0.001) between the RC and non-RC groups. There was no significant difference in total protein level (<i>P</i> = 0.285) in the non-RC and RC groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated reduced salivary flow and buffer capacity, along with lower albumin levels and higher mucin-1 concentrations in individuals with RC. The salivary analysis provides a noninvasive and effective approach to assess RC risk. Incorporating salivary diagnostics into routine dental check-ups, particularly for older patients, can help in tailoring preventive care and treatment plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"406-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129288/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_791_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_791_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估牙根龋活跃和无牙根龋(RC)受试者的唾液流速、pH值、缓冲能力和糖蛋白水平。材料和方法:在A B谢蒂纪念牙科科学研究所门诊部进行了一项横断面研究,样本量为94名受试者。筛选对象后,分别采集47例rc阳性和47例无rc的唾液样本进行分析。评估以下参数-唾液流速,pH值,缓冲容量,唾液淀粉酶,粘蛋白,白蛋白,球蛋白和唾液总蛋白水平。结果:RC组的年龄明显高于非RC组(P < 0.001)。各组间pH值差异无统计学意义(P = 0.050)。与RC组相比,非RC组的中位缓冲容量和流速更高。在缓冲容量(P < 0.001)和流速(P = 0.001)上,RC组与非RC组有显著差异。非RC组和RC组总蛋白水平差异无统计学意义(P = 0.285)。结论:研究表明,RC患者唾液流量和缓冲能力降低,白蛋白水平降低,黏液蛋白-1浓度升高。唾液分析提供了一种无创且有效的评估RC风险的方法。将唾液诊断纳入常规牙科检查,特别是对老年患者,可以帮助定制预防保健和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salivary analysis in adults with and without root caries in South coastal population of India - A cross-sectional analytical study.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, and glycoproteins levels in root caries-active and root caries (RC)-free subjects.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Outpatient Department of A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences with a sample size of 94 subjects. After screening of the subjects, the salivary samples were collected from 47 RC-active and 47 RC-free subjects for analysis. The following parameters were assessed - salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, levels of salivary amylase, mucin, albumin, globulin, and total salivary protein.

Results: Age was significantly higher in the RC group compared to the non-RC group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pH between the groups (P = 0.050). Median buffer capacity and flow rate were higher in the non-RC group compared to the RC group. There was a significant difference in buffer capacity (P < 0.001) and flow rate (P = 0.001) between the RC and non-RC groups. There was no significant difference in total protein level (P = 0.285) in the non-RC and RC groups.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated reduced salivary flow and buffer capacity, along with lower albumin levels and higher mucin-1 concentrations in individuals with RC. The salivary analysis provides a noninvasive and effective approach to assess RC risk. Incorporating salivary diagnostics into routine dental check-ups, particularly for older patients, can help in tailoring preventive care and treatment plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信