三种不同表面预处理方法对夹心技术中胶粘剂树脂渗透深度的比较评价——体外共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。

Sanjeev Kunhappan, Vaibhav Kridutta, Shweta Ratre, Sandhiya Rajendran, Lija Tharakan James, Muskan Agrawal
{"title":"三种不同表面预处理方法对夹心技术中胶粘剂树脂渗透深度的比较评价——体外共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。","authors":"Sanjeev Kunhappan, Vaibhav Kridutta, Shweta Ratre, Sandhiya Rajendran, Lija Tharakan James, Muskan Agrawal","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_168_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sandwich technique combines the use of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and composite to reduce polymerization shrinkage and postoperative sensitivity. Effective bonding relies on adhesive penetration inside RMGIC enhanced by surface pretreatments such as acid etching and lasers ensuring improved bond strength and longevity. The present study evaluated the depth of adhesive resin penetration into RMGIC using three surface pretreatment methods in sandwich technique analyzed through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Class I cavity preparation was done in 30 extracted maxillary premolars. RMGIC was applied and samples were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (control group, no pretreatment), Group 2 (etching was with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s), and Group 3 (treated with erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet laser). Rhodamine B dye was mixed with adhesive resin and applied over RMGIC followed by composite restoration. Samples were sectioned buccolingually and evaluated under CLSM. Data analysis was done using analysis of variance and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the three groups. The laser-treated group exhibited the greatest depth of penetration compared to the acid-etched and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laser pretreatment significantly enhances adhesive penetration depth compared to acid etching or control suggesting its clinical efficacy in improving bond strength in the sandwich technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 5","pages":"486-490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of three different methods of surface pretreatment on the depth of adhesive resin penetration in sandwich technique - An <i>in vitro</i> confocal laser scanning microscopy study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjeev Kunhappan, Vaibhav Kridutta, Shweta Ratre, Sandhiya Rajendran, Lija Tharakan James, Muskan Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_168_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sandwich technique combines the use of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and composite to reduce polymerization shrinkage and postoperative sensitivity. Effective bonding relies on adhesive penetration inside RMGIC enhanced by surface pretreatments such as acid etching and lasers ensuring improved bond strength and longevity. The present study evaluated the depth of adhesive resin penetration into RMGIC using three surface pretreatment methods in sandwich technique analyzed through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Class I cavity preparation was done in 30 extracted maxillary premolars. RMGIC was applied and samples were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (control group, no pretreatment), Group 2 (etching was with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s), and Group 3 (treated with erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet laser). Rhodamine B dye was mixed with adhesive resin and applied over RMGIC followed by composite restoration. Samples were sectioned buccolingually and evaluated under CLSM. Data analysis was done using analysis of variance and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the three groups. The laser-treated group exhibited the greatest depth of penetration compared to the acid-etched and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laser pretreatment significantly enhances adhesive penetration depth compared to acid etching or control suggesting its clinical efficacy in improving bond strength in the sandwich technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"486-490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_168_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_168_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:夹层技术结合了树脂改性玻璃离子水泥(RMGIC)和复合材料的使用,以减少聚合收缩和术后敏感性。有效的粘合依赖于RMGIC内部的粘合剂渗透,通过酸蚀刻和激光等表面预处理来增强粘合强度和寿命。本研究通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)分析了三种夹心技术的表面预处理方法,对胶粘剂树脂对RMGIC的渗透深度进行了评价。材料与方法:对30颗拔除的上颌前磨牙进行I类空腔制备。采用RMGIC,将样品分为三组:1组(对照组,不进行预处理),2组(37%磷酸蚀刻15 s), 3组(掺铒、铬的钇、钪、镓和石榴石激光处理)。罗丹明B染料与粘接树脂混合,涂在RMGIC上,然后进行复合修复。在CLSM下对样本进行口腔切片和评估。数据分析采用方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果:经统计学分析,三组间差异有统计学意义。与酸蚀组和对照组相比,激光处理组表现出最大的穿透深度。结论:与酸蚀或对照相比,激光预处理可显著提高粘接剂的渗透深度,提示其在三明治技术中提高粘接剂强度的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of three different methods of surface pretreatment on the depth of adhesive resin penetration in sandwich technique - An in vitro confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

Background: Sandwich technique combines the use of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and composite to reduce polymerization shrinkage and postoperative sensitivity. Effective bonding relies on adhesive penetration inside RMGIC enhanced by surface pretreatments such as acid etching and lasers ensuring improved bond strength and longevity. The present study evaluated the depth of adhesive resin penetration into RMGIC using three surface pretreatment methods in sandwich technique analyzed through confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

Materials and methods: Class I cavity preparation was done in 30 extracted maxillary premolars. RMGIC was applied and samples were categorized into three groups: Group 1 (control group, no pretreatment), Group 2 (etching was with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s), and Group 3 (treated with erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet laser). Rhodamine B dye was mixed with adhesive resin and applied over RMGIC followed by composite restoration. Samples were sectioned buccolingually and evaluated under CLSM. Data analysis was done using analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc tests.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the three groups. The laser-treated group exhibited the greatest depth of penetration compared to the acid-etched and control groups.

Conclusion: Laser pretreatment significantly enhances adhesive penetration depth compared to acid etching or control suggesting its clinical efficacy in improving bond strength in the sandwich technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信