COVID-19疫苗接种和既往SARS-CoV-2感染对艾滋病毒感染者随后COVID-19感染的影响

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Xueying Yang, Fanghui Shi, Shujie Chen, Ziang Liu, Yangjianchen Xu, Gregory A Poland, Sharon Weissman, Bankole Olatosi, Jiajia Zhang, Xiaoming Li
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗接种和既往SARS-CoV-2感染对艾滋病毒感染者随后COVID-19感染的影响","authors":"Xueying Yang, Fanghui Shi, Shujie Chen, Ziang Liu, Yangjianchen Xu, Gregory A Poland, Sharon Weissman, Bankole Olatosi, Jiajia Zhang, Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to estimate the time-varying effects of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination and past SARS-CoV-2 infection on subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection (including new infection and re-infection) in people with HIV (PWH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort was retrieved from the integrated statewide HIV electronic health record (EHR) dataset, COVID-19 vaccination dataset, and COVID-19 diagnoses dataset between March 2, 2020 and April 14, 2022. The pre-specified outcome was any SARS-CoV-2 infection. We used Cox regression to estimate the time-varying effects of primary and booster vaccination and past infection on the risks of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18,509 eligible PWH who had documentation of COVID-19 testing or COVID-19 vaccination records were included for analysis. The effectiveness of primary vaccination against infection, compared with being unvaccinated, was relatively low (26.70 %, 95 % CI: 12.10 %, 38.88 %) at two months, while the effectiveness of a booster dose after two months was high (43.53 %, 95 %CI: 27.54 %, 55.99 %), compared with primary vaccination only (e.g., first two doses of Pfizer or Moderna, or the single dose of Janssen). The effectiveness of past COVID-19 infection during Pre-Delta and Delta dominant periods at one month against reinfection was (67.43 %; 95 %CI: 52.74 %, 77.55 %) and (64.57 %; 95 %CI: 1.39 %, 87.27 %), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Natural immunity conferred from past COVID-19 infection in PWH against reinfection appeared to be higher than vaccine-induced immunity. Boosters were more effective than the primary series alone in preventing subsequent infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of COVID-19 vaccination and past SARS-CoV-2 infection on subsequent COVID-19 infection in people with HIV.\",\"authors\":\"Xueying Yang, Fanghui Shi, Shujie Chen, Ziang Liu, Yangjianchen Xu, Gregory A Poland, Sharon Weissman, Bankole Olatosi, Jiajia Zhang, Xiaoming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to estimate the time-varying effects of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination and past SARS-CoV-2 infection on subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection (including new infection and re-infection) in people with HIV (PWH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort was retrieved from the integrated statewide HIV electronic health record (EHR) dataset, COVID-19 vaccination dataset, and COVID-19 diagnoses dataset between March 2, 2020 and April 14, 2022. The pre-specified outcome was any SARS-CoV-2 infection. We used Cox regression to estimate the time-varying effects of primary and booster vaccination and past infection on the risks of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18,509 eligible PWH who had documentation of COVID-19 testing or COVID-19 vaccination records were included for analysis. The effectiveness of primary vaccination against infection, compared with being unvaccinated, was relatively low (26.70 %, 95 % CI: 12.10 %, 38.88 %) at two months, while the effectiveness of a booster dose after two months was high (43.53 %, 95 %CI: 27.54 %, 55.99 %), compared with primary vaccination only (e.g., first two doses of Pfizer or Moderna, or the single dose of Janssen). The effectiveness of past COVID-19 infection during Pre-Delta and Delta dominant periods at one month against reinfection was (67.43 %; 95 %CI: 52.74 %, 77.55 %) and (64.57 %; 95 %CI: 1.39 %, 87.27 %), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Natural immunity conferred from past COVID-19 infection in PWH against reinfection appeared to be higher than vaccine-induced immunity. Boosters were more effective than the primary series alone in preventing subsequent infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.05.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估初次接种和加强接种COVID-19疫苗以及既往SARS-CoV-2感染对HIV感染者(PWH)后续SARS-CoV-2感染(包括新感染和再感染)的时变影响。方法:从2020年3月2日至2022年4月14日期间的全州艾滋病毒电子健康记录(EHR)综合数据集、COVID-19疫苗接种数据集和COVID-19诊断数据集中检索基于人群的队列。预先指定的结果是任何SARS-CoV-2感染。我们使用Cox回归来估计初次和加强疫苗接种以及既往感染对后续SARS-CoV-2感染风险的时变影响。结果:共有18509名具有COVID-19检测文件或COVID-19疫苗接种记录的合格PWH纳入分析。与未接种疫苗相比,初次接种2个月时抗感染的有效性相对较低(26.70%,95% CI: 12.10%, 38.88%),而2个月后加强剂量的有效性较高(43.53%,95% CI: 27.54%, 55.99%),与仅接种一次疫苗(例如,前两剂辉瑞或Moderna,或单剂杨森)相比。在1个月的前三角洲期和三角洲优势期,既往COVID-19感染对再次感染的有效性为67.43%;95% CI: 52.74%, 77.55%)和(64.57%;95% CI: 1.39%, 87.27%)。结论:PWH患者因既往感染COVID-19而产生的自然免疫似乎高于疫苗诱导的免疫。在预防继发感染方面,增强疫苗比单独接种初级系列疫苗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of COVID-19 vaccination and past SARS-CoV-2 infection on subsequent COVID-19 infection in people with HIV.

Background: This study aims to estimate the time-varying effects of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination and past SARS-CoV-2 infection on subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection (including new infection and re-infection) in people with HIV (PWH).

Methods: A population-based cohort was retrieved from the integrated statewide HIV electronic health record (EHR) dataset, COVID-19 vaccination dataset, and COVID-19 diagnoses dataset between March 2, 2020 and April 14, 2022. The pre-specified outcome was any SARS-CoV-2 infection. We used Cox regression to estimate the time-varying effects of primary and booster vaccination and past infection on the risks of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results: A total of 18,509 eligible PWH who had documentation of COVID-19 testing or COVID-19 vaccination records were included for analysis. The effectiveness of primary vaccination against infection, compared with being unvaccinated, was relatively low (26.70 %, 95 % CI: 12.10 %, 38.88 %) at two months, while the effectiveness of a booster dose after two months was high (43.53 %, 95 %CI: 27.54 %, 55.99 %), compared with primary vaccination only (e.g., first two doses of Pfizer or Moderna, or the single dose of Janssen). The effectiveness of past COVID-19 infection during Pre-Delta and Delta dominant periods at one month against reinfection was (67.43 %; 95 %CI: 52.74 %, 77.55 %) and (64.57 %; 95 %CI: 1.39 %, 87.27 %), respectively.

Conclusion: Natural immunity conferred from past COVID-19 infection in PWH against reinfection appeared to be higher than vaccine-induced immunity. Boosters were more effective than the primary series alone in preventing subsequent infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信