肥胖对结直肠癌患者癌症特异性生存和总生存的影响

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Elvis Obomanu, Tinsae Anebo, Karecia Byfield, Abidemi Akinrinmade, Gabor Varadi
{"title":"肥胖对结直肠癌患者癌症特异性生存和总生存的影响","authors":"Elvis Obomanu, Tinsae Anebo, Karecia Byfield, Abidemi Akinrinmade, Gabor Varadi","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2025.2514782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is a well-established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) development, yet its influence on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) remains paradoxical. While obesity correlates with adverse outcomes such as increased recurrence, metastasis, and treatment-related complications, emerging evidence highlights a counterintuitive \"obesity paradox,\" where overweight and moderately obese patients with Body Mass Index(BMI 25-30) exhibit improved CSS and OS compared to underweight (BMI <18.5) or morbidly obese (BMI >35) individuals. Proposed mechanisms for this paradox include altered molecular signaling (adipokine imbalances), enhanced energy metabolism, and greater treatment tolerance due to metabolic reserves. However, these findings are contentious, as BMI, a crude measure, fails to distinguish lean mass from visceral adiposity, key determinants of prognosis. Studies suggest that moderate obesity may buffer treatment toxicity, while extremes of BMI reflect frailty or metabolic dysfunction, worsening survival. This review critically examines the biological underpinnings of the obesity paradox and challenges BMI's reliability as a prognostic tool. Research must prioritize advanced body composition metrics (visceral fat quantification <i>via</i> imaging) to disentangle obesity's dual role in CRC outcomes. Such precision could guide tailored interventions, transforming the paradox from a scientific curiosity into a therapeutic strategy, optimizing survival for CRC patients across the weight spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Obesity on Cancer-Specific Survival and Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Elvis Obomanu, Tinsae Anebo, Karecia Byfield, Abidemi Akinrinmade, Gabor Varadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01635581.2025.2514782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obesity is a well-established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) development, yet its influence on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) remains paradoxical. While obesity correlates with adverse outcomes such as increased recurrence, metastasis, and treatment-related complications, emerging evidence highlights a counterintuitive \\\"obesity paradox,\\\" where overweight and moderately obese patients with Body Mass Index(BMI 25-30) exhibit improved CSS and OS compared to underweight (BMI <18.5) or morbidly obese (BMI >35) individuals. Proposed mechanisms for this paradox include altered molecular signaling (adipokine imbalances), enhanced energy metabolism, and greater treatment tolerance due to metabolic reserves. However, these findings are contentious, as BMI, a crude measure, fails to distinguish lean mass from visceral adiposity, key determinants of prognosis. Studies suggest that moderate obesity may buffer treatment toxicity, while extremes of BMI reflect frailty or metabolic dysfunction, worsening survival. This review critically examines the biological underpinnings of the obesity paradox and challenges BMI's reliability as a prognostic tool. Research must prioritize advanced body composition metrics (visceral fat quantification <i>via</i> imaging) to disentangle obesity's dual role in CRC outcomes. Such precision could guide tailored interventions, transforming the paradox from a scientific curiosity into a therapeutic strategy, optimizing survival for CRC patients across the weight spectrum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2514782\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2514782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖是结直肠癌(CRC)发展的一个公认的危险因素,但其对癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)的影响仍然是矛盾的。虽然肥胖与复发、转移和治疗相关并发症增加等不良结果相关,但新出现的证据强调了一个反直觉的“肥胖悖论”,即体重指数(BMI 25-30)的超重和中度肥胖患者与体重不足(BMI 35)的患者相比,CSS和OS有所改善。这一矛盾的机制包括分子信号的改变(脂肪因子失衡)、能量代谢的增强以及代谢储备导致的更大的治疗耐受性。然而,这些发现是有争议的,因为BMI是一种粗糙的测量方法,不能区分瘦质量和内脏脂肪,而内脏脂肪是预后的关键决定因素。研究表明,中度肥胖可以缓冲治疗的毒性,而极端的BMI则反映出虚弱或代谢功能障碍,从而恶化生存。这篇综述批判性地考察了肥胖悖论的生物学基础,并对BMI作为预后工具的可靠性提出了质疑。研究必须优先考虑先进的身体成分指标(通过成像进行内脏脂肪量化),以解开肥胖在结直肠癌结局中的双重作用。这种精确度可以指导量身定制的干预措施,将悖论从科学好奇转化为治疗策略,优化整个体重谱的结直肠癌患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Obesity on Cancer-Specific Survival and Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer.

Obesity is a well-established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) development, yet its influence on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) remains paradoxical. While obesity correlates with adverse outcomes such as increased recurrence, metastasis, and treatment-related complications, emerging evidence highlights a counterintuitive "obesity paradox," where overweight and moderately obese patients with Body Mass Index(BMI 25-30) exhibit improved CSS and OS compared to underweight (BMI <18.5) or morbidly obese (BMI >35) individuals. Proposed mechanisms for this paradox include altered molecular signaling (adipokine imbalances), enhanced energy metabolism, and greater treatment tolerance due to metabolic reserves. However, these findings are contentious, as BMI, a crude measure, fails to distinguish lean mass from visceral adiposity, key determinants of prognosis. Studies suggest that moderate obesity may buffer treatment toxicity, while extremes of BMI reflect frailty or metabolic dysfunction, worsening survival. This review critically examines the biological underpinnings of the obesity paradox and challenges BMI's reliability as a prognostic tool. Research must prioritize advanced body composition metrics (visceral fat quantification via imaging) to disentangle obesity's dual role in CRC outcomes. Such precision could guide tailored interventions, transforming the paradox from a scientific curiosity into a therapeutic strategy, optimizing survival for CRC patients across the weight spectrum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信