一种新的家庭强制肺活量测定法与支气管扩张剂反应测量在哮喘患者评估中的可行性。

IF 1.6 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Héctor Cabrerizo Carreño, Cristina Bellver Asperilla, Ana Maria Romero-Ortiz, Salud Santos, Samantha Aso-González, Jaume Bordas-Martinez, Nuria Fabrellas, Eva Maria Guix-Comellas, Guillermo Suarez-Cuartin, Mariana Muñoz-Esquerre
{"title":"一种新的家庭强制肺活量测定法与支气管扩张剂反应测量在哮喘患者评估中的可行性。","authors":"Héctor Cabrerizo Carreño, Cristina Bellver Asperilla, Ana Maria Romero-Ortiz, Salud Santos, Samantha Aso-González, Jaume Bordas-Martinez, Nuria Fabrellas, Eva Maria Guix-Comellas, Guillermo Suarez-Cuartin, Mariana Muñoz-Esquerre","doi":"10.5826/mrm.2025.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home spirometry using portable devices offers a potential alternative for asthma management by reducing hospital dependence and improving accessibility. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a home spirometry program with bronchodilator response (BDR) testing performed without direct medical supervision.  Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 47 asthma patients from a tertiary hospital. Participants received clear instructions and performed forced spirometry with BDR testing at home using a portable device. The primary outcomes included spirometry quality, variability compared to hospital tests, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78% of participants achieved high-quality spirometry (A or B, according to ATS/ERS -criteria), despite greater variability in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared to hospital tests. However, the results remained clinically acceptable. Patients reported high satisfaction with the device, highlighting its ease of use and convenience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home spirometry with BDR testing is a feasible tool for asthma follow-up, maintaining acceptable quality while reducing hospital-based testing. Although improvements are needed to minimize variability and enhance consistency, this program has the potential to optimize asthma management, increase accessibility, and reduce the burden on healthcare facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability of a new home program of forced spirometry with bronchodilator response measurement in the assessment of patients with asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Héctor Cabrerizo Carreño, Cristina Bellver Asperilla, Ana Maria Romero-Ortiz, Salud Santos, Samantha Aso-González, Jaume Bordas-Martinez, Nuria Fabrellas, Eva Maria Guix-Comellas, Guillermo Suarez-Cuartin, Mariana Muñoz-Esquerre\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/mrm.2025.1024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home spirometry using portable devices offers a potential alternative for asthma management by reducing hospital dependence and improving accessibility. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a home spirometry program with bronchodilator response (BDR) testing performed without direct medical supervision.  Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 47 asthma patients from a tertiary hospital. Participants received clear instructions and performed forced spirometry with BDR testing at home using a portable device. The primary outcomes included spirometry quality, variability compared to hospital tests, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78% of participants achieved high-quality spirometry (A or B, according to ATS/ERS -criteria), despite greater variability in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared to hospital tests. However, the results remained clinically acceptable. Patients reported high satisfaction with the device, highlighting its ease of use and convenience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home spirometry with BDR testing is a feasible tool for asthma follow-up, maintaining acceptable quality while reducing hospital-based testing. Although improvements are needed to minimize variability and enhance consistency, this program has the potential to optimize asthma management, increase accessibility, and reduce the burden on healthcare facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158468/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用便携式设备的家庭肺活量测定通过减少对医院的依赖和提高可及性,为哮喘管理提供了潜在的替代方案。本研究旨在评估在没有直接医疗监督的情况下进行支气管扩张剂反应(BDR)测试的家庭肺活量测定方案的可行性。方法:对某三级医院47例哮喘患者进行前瞻性观察研究。参与者接受了明确的指导,并在家中使用便携式设备进行了强制肺活量测定和BDR测试。主要结局包括肺活量测量质量、与医院测试相比的可变性和患者满意度。结果:尽管与医院测试相比,用力肺活量(FVC)和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的差异更大,但共有78%的参与者获得了高质量的肺活量测定(根据ATS/ERS -标准A或B)。然而,结果仍然是临床可接受的。患者对该设备的满意度很高,突出了其易用性和便利性。结论:家庭肺活量测定与BDR检测是哮喘随访的可行工具,在减少医院检测的同时保持可接受的质量。虽然需要改进以尽量减少可变性和增强一致性,但该项目具有优化哮喘管理、增加可及性和减轻医疗机构负担的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viability of a new home program of forced spirometry with bronchodilator response measurement in the assessment of patients with asthma.

Background: Home spirometry using portable devices offers a potential alternative for asthma management by reducing hospital dependence and improving accessibility. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a home spirometry program with bronchodilator response (BDR) testing performed without direct medical supervision.  Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 47 asthma patients from a tertiary hospital. Participants received clear instructions and performed forced spirometry with BDR testing at home using a portable device. The primary outcomes included spirometry quality, variability compared to hospital tests, and patient satisfaction.

Results: A total of 78% of participants achieved high-quality spirometry (A or B, according to ATS/ERS -criteria), despite greater variability in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared to hospital tests. However, the results remained clinically acceptable. Patients reported high satisfaction with the device, highlighting its ease of use and convenience.

Conclusions: Home spirometry with BDR testing is a feasible tool for asthma follow-up, maintaining acceptable quality while reducing hospital-based testing. Although improvements are needed to minimize variability and enhance consistency, this program has the potential to optimize asthma management, increase accessibility, and reduce the burden on healthcare facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信