情境教育心理学实践。探索当代丹麦教育心理学实践中“实践转向”的呼唤。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Sarah Kirkegaard Jensen, Thomas Szulevicz
{"title":"情境教育心理学实践。探索当代丹麦教育心理学实践中“实践转向”的呼唤。","authors":"Sarah Kirkegaard Jensen, Thomas Szulevicz","doi":"10.1007/s12124-025-09915-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, Denmark has witnessed issues related to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents, marked by rising psychiatric diagnoses, school absenteeism, and increasing segregation in educational settings. This development has intensified the demand for Educational Psychology (EP) practice services but also started a public and professional debate about the role and effectiveness of EP practice. Critics argue that EP practice is too detached from pedagogical realities, focusing excessively on documenting individual difficulties rather than supporting educational practices. Thus, educational psychologists are requested to make a turn towards practice. Through a situated psychological lens, this article explores the desired practice turn of EP practice: what kind of practice is presented in the current educational and political discussion and what is the role of educational psychology and educational psychology practice in this raised critique of a 'practice-distant' EP practice? Through a situated psychological lens, the article argues that understanding the field of EP practice, including the role of educational psychologists in contemporary educational practices, requires acknowledging its historical and contextual situatedness inside the practice of institutionalized education. In addition, the article argues for a fundamental theoretical and normative discussion about the type of practices educational psychologists should support.</p>","PeriodicalId":50356,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science","volume":"59 2","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situating Educational Psychology Practice. Exploring the Call for a 'Practice Turn' in Contemporary Danish Educational Psychology Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Kirkegaard Jensen, Thomas Szulevicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12124-025-09915-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, Denmark has witnessed issues related to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents, marked by rising psychiatric diagnoses, school absenteeism, and increasing segregation in educational settings. This development has intensified the demand for Educational Psychology (EP) practice services but also started a public and professional debate about the role and effectiveness of EP practice. Critics argue that EP practice is too detached from pedagogical realities, focusing excessively on documenting individual difficulties rather than supporting educational practices. Thus, educational psychologists are requested to make a turn towards practice. Through a situated psychological lens, this article explores the desired practice turn of EP practice: what kind of practice is presented in the current educational and political discussion and what is the role of educational psychology and educational psychology practice in this raised critique of a 'practice-distant' EP practice? Through a situated psychological lens, the article argues that understanding the field of EP practice, including the role of educational psychologists in contemporary educational practices, requires acknowledging its historical and contextual situatedness inside the practice of institutionalized education. In addition, the article argues for a fundamental theoretical and normative discussion about the type of practices educational psychologists should support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-025-09915-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-025-09915-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,丹麦出现了与儿童和青少年的心理健康和福祉有关的问题,其特点是精神病诊断率上升、缺课和教育环境中的隔离现象日益严重。这一发展加剧了对教育心理学实践服务的需求,但也引发了公众和专业人士对教育心理学实践的作用和有效性的争论。批评人士认为,EP实践与教学现实过于脱节,过分关注记录个人困难,而不是支持教育实践。因此,教育心理学家被要求转向实践。本文通过一个情境心理学的视角,探讨了教育实践的理想实践转向:在当前的教育和政治讨论中呈现了什么样的实践?教育心理学和教育心理学实践在这种对“实践疏远”的教育实践的批评中扮演了什么角色?通过情境心理学的视角,本文认为理解教育心理学实践领域,包括教育心理学家在当代教育实践中的作用,需要承认其在制度化教育实践中的历史和语境情境性。此外,本文还主张对教育心理学家应该支持的实践类型进行基本的理论和规范讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Situating Educational Psychology Practice. Exploring the Call for a 'Practice Turn' in Contemporary Danish Educational Psychology Practice.

In recent years, Denmark has witnessed issues related to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents, marked by rising psychiatric diagnoses, school absenteeism, and increasing segregation in educational settings. This development has intensified the demand for Educational Psychology (EP) practice services but also started a public and professional debate about the role and effectiveness of EP practice. Critics argue that EP practice is too detached from pedagogical realities, focusing excessively on documenting individual difficulties rather than supporting educational practices. Thus, educational psychologists are requested to make a turn towards practice. Through a situated psychological lens, this article explores the desired practice turn of EP practice: what kind of practice is presented in the current educational and political discussion and what is the role of educational psychology and educational psychology practice in this raised critique of a 'practice-distant' EP practice? Through a situated psychological lens, the article argues that understanding the field of EP practice, including the role of educational psychologists in contemporary educational practices, requires acknowledging its historical and contextual situatedness inside the practice of institutionalized education. In addition, the article argues for a fundamental theoretical and normative discussion about the type of practices educational psychologists should support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science is an international interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of basic knowledge in the social and behavioral sciences. IPBS covers such topics as cultural nature of human conduct and its evolutionary history, anthropology, ethology, communication processes between people, and within-- as well as between-- societies. A special focus will be given to integration of perspectives of the social and biological sciences through theoretical models of epigenesis. It contains articles pertaining to theoretical integration of ideas, epistemology of social and biological sciences, and original empirical research articles of general scientific value. History of the social sciences is covered by IPBS in cases relevant for further development of theoretical perspectives and empirical elaborations within the social and biological sciences. IPBS has the goal of integrating knowledge from different areas into a new synthesis of universal social science—overcoming the post-modernist fragmentation of ideas of recent decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信