Timothy Pommée, Liziane Bouvier, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Marc F Maffei, Sarah E Gutz, Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky, Rosemary Martino, James D Berry, Agessandro Abrahao, Lorne Zinman, Jordan R Green, Yana Yunusova
{"title":"肌萎缩性侧索硬化球功能障碍指数的构建效度。","authors":"Timothy Pommée, Liziane Bouvier, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Marc F Maffei, Sarah E Gutz, Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky, Rosemary Martino, James D Berry, Agessandro Abrahao, Lorne Zinman, Jordan R Green, Yana Yunusova","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (<i>r</i> = -.85), CNS-BFS (<i>r</i> = .85), and EAT-10 (<i>r</i> = .77). The ALSBDI-R effectively discriminated between severity groups, supporting its construct validity. Severity bins were created based on median ALSBDI-R total scores for each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Pommée, Liziane Bouvier, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Marc F Maffei, Sarah E Gutz, Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky, Rosemary Martino, James D Berry, Agessandro Abrahao, Lorne Zinman, Jordan R Green, Yana Yunusova\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (<i>r</i> = -.85), CNS-BFS (<i>r</i> = .85), and EAT-10 (<i>r</i> = .77). The ALSBDI-R effectively discriminated between severity groups, supporting its construct validity. Severity bins were created based on median ALSBDI-R total scores for each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.
Purpose: The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.
Method: A total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).
Results: Strong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (r = -.85), CNS-BFS (r = .85), and EAT-10 (r = .77). The ALSBDI-R effectively discriminated between severity groups, supporting its construct validity. Severity bins were created based on median ALSBDI-R total scores for each group.
Conclusions: The ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.