肌萎缩性侧索硬化球功能障碍指数的构建效度。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Timothy Pommée, Liziane Bouvier, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Marc F Maffei, Sarah E Gutz, Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky, Rosemary Martino, James D Berry, Agessandro Abrahao, Lorne Zinman, Jordan R Green, Yana Yunusova
{"title":"肌萎缩性侧索硬化球功能障碍指数的构建效度。","authors":"Timothy Pommée, Liziane Bouvier, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Marc F Maffei, Sarah E Gutz, Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky, Rosemary Martino, James D Berry, Agessandro Abrahao, Lorne Zinman, Jordan R Green, Yana Yunusova","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (<i>r</i> = -.85), CNS-BFS (<i>r</i> = .85), and EAT-10 (<i>r</i> = .77). The ALSBDI-R effectively discriminated between severity groups, supporting its construct validity. Severity bins were created based on median ALSBDI-R total scores for each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Pommée, Liziane Bouvier, Carolina Barnett-Tapia, Marc F Maffei, Sarah E Gutz, Victoria E Tilton-Bolowsky, Rosemary Martino, James D Berry, Agessandro Abrahao, Lorne Zinman, Jordan R Green, Yana Yunusova\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (<i>r</i> = -.85), CNS-BFS (<i>r</i> = .85), and EAT-10 (<i>r</i> = .77). The ALSBDI-R effectively discriminated between severity groups, supporting its construct validity. Severity bins were created based on median ALSBDI-R total scores for each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的球功能障碍指数-远程(ALSBDI-R)是一种临床管理的工具,旨在远程评估肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的球功能障碍。本研究旨在通过检验ALSBDI-R与已建立的临床指标的相关性以及区分不同球疾病严重程度的能力来评估其结构效度。方法:从2个多学科门诊共招募92例ALS患者。使用ALSBDI-R、肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)、神经学研究中心球功能量表(CNS-BFS)、句子可理解性测试和进食评估工具(EAT-10)对参与者进行评估。通过Spearman相关和比较不同球严重程度组(无症状、轻度、中度、重度)的ALSBDI-R评分来建立结构效度。结果:ALSBDI-R总分与球茎特异性指标如ALSFRS-R球茎亚评分(r = - 0.85)、CNS-BFS (r = 0.85)和EAT-10 (r = 0.77)之间存在强相关性。ALSBDI-R在严重程度组之间具有有效的区别,支持其结构效度。根据各组ALSBDI-R总分的中位数创建严重性分组。结论:ALSBDI-R是远程评估ALS患者球功能障碍的有效工具。尽管存在一些限制,但它能够捕捉不同程度的严重程度,这使得它在临床应用和研究中具有价值,为远程监测疾病进展提供了一种标准化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.

Purpose: The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.

Method: A total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).

Results: Strong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (r = -.85), CNS-BFS (r = .85), and EAT-10 (r = .77). The ALSBDI-R effectively discriminated between severity groups, supporting its construct validity. Severity bins were created based on median ALSBDI-R total scores for each group.

Conclusions: The ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信