{"title":"尼泊尔一家三级医院世界卫生组织手术安全检查表的使用和完整性。","authors":"U Shrestha, P Ghimire, G Khatri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO-SSC) reduces surgical complications and morbidity; however, its utilization remains low in low- and middleincome countries. Objective To assess the utilization and completeness of a modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a tertiary hospital in Nepal. Method A descriptive, observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 300 surgeries at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (February to May 2024) following ethical clearance. Utilization and completeness of the modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (Pre-procedure check, Sign-in, Time-out, Sign-out) were observed passively. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS v 20. Data were presented in numbers and percentages and Chi-square/ Fisher's exact test used for categorical variables. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Result WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was utilized in 48.7% of cases, with full compliance in only 8.7%. Utilization rate was seen to be 63% in the Pre-procedure check, while Sign-out was the least performed (29.3%). Highest utilization was seen in the General Surgery department, while the highest completion rate was seen in Neurosurgery (100%). Verbal confirmation (70.2%) was done more than written documentation. Conclusion Despite proven benefits, adherence to WHO Surgical Safety Checklist remains suboptimal. Targeted training and regular audits are essential to improve compliance and patient safety in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":35493,"journal":{"name":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","volume":"22 88","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization and Completeness of World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in a Tertiary Hospital in Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"U Shrestha, P Ghimire, G Khatri\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO-SSC) reduces surgical complications and morbidity; however, its utilization remains low in low- and middleincome countries. Objective To assess the utilization and completeness of a modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a tertiary hospital in Nepal. Method A descriptive, observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 300 surgeries at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (February to May 2024) following ethical clearance. Utilization and completeness of the modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (Pre-procedure check, Sign-in, Time-out, Sign-out) were observed passively. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS v 20. Data were presented in numbers and percentages and Chi-square/ Fisher's exact test used for categorical variables. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Result WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was utilized in 48.7% of cases, with full compliance in only 8.7%. Utilization rate was seen to be 63% in the Pre-procedure check, while Sign-out was the least performed (29.3%). Highest utilization was seen in the General Surgery department, while the highest completion rate was seen in Neurosurgery (100%). Verbal confirmation (70.2%) was done more than written documentation. Conclusion Despite proven benefits, adherence to WHO Surgical Safety Checklist remains suboptimal. Targeted training and regular audits are essential to improve compliance and patient safety in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kathmandu University Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 88\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kathmandu University Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kathmandu University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:世界卫生组织手术安全检查表(WHO-SSC)减少了手术并发症和发病率;然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,其利用率仍然很低。目的评估尼泊尔某三级医院修订后的世卫组织手术安全检查表的使用情况和完整性。方法对加德满都医学院教学医院(2024年2月至5月)300例手术进行描述性、观察性横断面研究。被动观察修改后的WHO手术安全检查表(术前检查、签到、暂停、签到)的使用情况和完整性。数据分析采用Microsoft Excel和SPSS v 20软件。数据以数字和百分比表示,分类变量采用卡方/费雪精确检验。p值< 0.05被认为是显著的。结果使用WHO手术安全检查表的病例占48.7%,完全遵守检查表的病例仅占8.7%。Pre-procedure检查的使用率为63%,而Sign-out的使用率最低(29.3%)。普通外科的使用率最高,而神经外科的完成率最高(100%)。口头确认(70.2%)多于书面文件。结论:尽管已证实有益处,但遵守世卫组织手术安全清单仍不是最佳选择。在资源有限的情况下,有针对性的培训和定期审计对于改善依从性和患者安全至关重要。
Utilization and Completeness of World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in a Tertiary Hospital in Nepal.
Background The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO-SSC) reduces surgical complications and morbidity; however, its utilization remains low in low- and middleincome countries. Objective To assess the utilization and completeness of a modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a tertiary hospital in Nepal. Method A descriptive, observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 300 surgeries at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (February to May 2024) following ethical clearance. Utilization and completeness of the modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (Pre-procedure check, Sign-in, Time-out, Sign-out) were observed passively. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS v 20. Data were presented in numbers and percentages and Chi-square/ Fisher's exact test used for categorical variables. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Result WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was utilized in 48.7% of cases, with full compliance in only 8.7%. Utilization rate was seen to be 63% in the Pre-procedure check, while Sign-out was the least performed (29.3%). Highest utilization was seen in the General Surgery department, while the highest completion rate was seen in Neurosurgery (100%). Verbal confirmation (70.2%) was done more than written documentation. Conclusion Despite proven benefits, adherence to WHO Surgical Safety Checklist remains suboptimal. Targeted training and regular audits are essential to improve compliance and patient safety in resource-limited settings.