[斜外侧椎间融合通道技术在腰椎感染中的应用]。

Q4 Medicine
Sheng-Yun Li, Jun Li, Xiao-Rui Zhang, Jie Song, Xiu-Lei Xu, Kai Lyu, Xing Zhao
{"title":"[斜外侧椎间融合通道技术在腰椎感染中的应用]。","authors":"Sheng-Yun Li, Jun Li, Xiao-Rui Zhang, Jie Song, Xiu-Lei Xu, Kai Lyu, Xing Zhao","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion(OLIF) channel technique combined with pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of single-segment lumbar intervertebral space/vertebral body infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 23 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar infection from January 2021 to December 2022. The patients were divided into the OLIF channel group and the traditional open surgery group according to the surgical methods. There were 16 cases in the OLIF channel group, including 9 males and 7 females, with an average age of (68.5±12.1) years old;there were 7 cases in the traditional open surgery group, including 4 males and 3 females, with an average age of (75.0±3.2) years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, incision length, visual analogue scale(VAS), activities of daily living (ADL) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), C-reactive protein(CRP) before and 1 week and 3 months after the operation, and the intervertebral fusion status on the last follow-up CT were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the open surgery group, the OLIF channel group had shorter operation time (209.87±31.5) min <i>vs.</i> (246.0±42.7) min, less intraoperative blood loss (225.625±91.1) ml <i>vs.</i> (364.2±74.8) ml, and shorter incision length (6.1±1.2) <i>vs.</i> (14.0±1.4) cm, and the differences were statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). Before and 1 week and 3 months after the operation, the lumbar VAS in the OLIF group were (6.3±0.6), (2.8±0.7), (1.1±0.5), and those in the traditional open surgery group were (6.4±0.6), (3.4±0.5), (1.2±0.3);the ADL scores in the OLIF group were (45.0±4.5), (60.3±4.3), (94.1±4.2), and those in the open group were (46.4±5.6), (60.7±4.5), (92.9±4.9); the ODI scores in the OLIF group were (86.3±2.9)%, (69.5±4.1)%, (23.0±3.2)%, and those in the open group were (87.3±3.8)%, (69.8±4.2)%, (23.8±3.6)%, all of which showed significant improvement(<i>P</i><0.05). Three months after the operation, CRP, PCT, and ESR were significantly lower than those before the operation, and CRP and PCT returned to normal, while ESR was still slightly elevated in some patients. The last follow-up CT showed that continuous trabecular bone formation was observed between the upper and lower endplates of the surgical segments in all patients, and the fusion time was (8.7±4.5) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OLIF channel technique combined with posterior internal fixation is a minimally invasive and effective treatment method, which can effectively control infection, relieve pain, and improve the quality of life of patients. Compared with traditional open surgery, it has the advantages of minimally invasive, shorter operation time, and less intraoperative blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 5","pages":"473-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application of oblique lateral interbody fusion channel technique in lumbar infection].\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Yun Li, Jun Li, Xiao-Rui Zhang, Jie Song, Xiu-Lei Xu, Kai Lyu, Xing Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion(OLIF) channel technique combined with pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of single-segment lumbar intervertebral space/vertebral body infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 23 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar infection from January 2021 to December 2022. The patients were divided into the OLIF channel group and the traditional open surgery group according to the surgical methods. There were 16 cases in the OLIF channel group, including 9 males and 7 females, with an average age of (68.5±12.1) years old;there were 7 cases in the traditional open surgery group, including 4 males and 3 females, with an average age of (75.0±3.2) years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, incision length, visual analogue scale(VAS), activities of daily living (ADL) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), C-reactive protein(CRP) before and 1 week and 3 months after the operation, and the intervertebral fusion status on the last follow-up CT were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the open surgery group, the OLIF channel group had shorter operation time (209.87±31.5) min <i>vs.</i> (246.0±42.7) min, less intraoperative blood loss (225.625±91.1) ml <i>vs.</i> (364.2±74.8) ml, and shorter incision length (6.1±1.2) <i>vs.</i> (14.0±1.4) cm, and the differences were statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). Before and 1 week and 3 months after the operation, the lumbar VAS in the OLIF group were (6.3±0.6), (2.8±0.7), (1.1±0.5), and those in the traditional open surgery group were (6.4±0.6), (3.4±0.5), (1.2±0.3);the ADL scores in the OLIF group were (45.0±4.5), (60.3±4.3), (94.1±4.2), and those in the open group were (46.4±5.6), (60.7±4.5), (92.9±4.9); the ODI scores in the OLIF group were (86.3±2.9)%, (69.5±4.1)%, (23.0±3.2)%, and those in the open group were (87.3±3.8)%, (69.8±4.2)%, (23.8±3.6)%, all of which showed significant improvement(<i>P</i><0.05). Three months after the operation, CRP, PCT, and ESR were significantly lower than those before the operation, and CRP and PCT returned to normal, while ESR was still slightly elevated in some patients. The last follow-up CT showed that continuous trabecular bone formation was observed between the upper and lower endplates of the surgical segments in all patients, and the fusion time was (8.7±4.5) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OLIF channel technique combined with posterior internal fixation is a minimally invasive and effective treatment method, which can effectively control infection, relieve pain, and improve the quality of life of patients. Compared with traditional open surgery, it has the advantages of minimally invasive, shorter operation time, and less intraoperative blood loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"473-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨斜外侧椎间融合(OLIF)通道技术联合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗单节段腰椎间隙/椎体感染的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月接受腰椎感染手术治疗的23例患者。根据手术方式将患者分为OLIF通道组和传统开放手术组。OLIF通道组16例,男9例,女7例,平均年龄(68.5±12.1)岁;传统开放组7例,男4例,女3例,平均年龄(75.0±3.2)岁。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、切口长度、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术前、术后1周、3个月的日常生活活动能力(ADL)评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、末次随访CT椎间融合情况。结果:与开放手术组相比,OLIF通道组手术时间(209.87±31.5)min比(246.0±42.7)min短(209.87±31.5)min,术中出血量(225.625±91.1)ml比(364.2±74.8)ml,切口长度(6.1±1.2)cm比(14.0±1.4)cm短,差异均有统计学意义(ppp)。OLIF通道技术联合后路内固定是一种微创有效的治疗方法,可有效控制感染,缓解疼痛,提高患者的生活质量。与传统开放手术相比,具有微创、手术时间短、术中出血量少等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Application of oblique lateral interbody fusion channel technique in lumbar infection].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of oblique lateral interbody fusion(OLIF) channel technique combined with pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of single-segment lumbar intervertebral space/vertebral body infection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 23 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar infection from January 2021 to December 2022. The patients were divided into the OLIF channel group and the traditional open surgery group according to the surgical methods. There were 16 cases in the OLIF channel group, including 9 males and 7 females, with an average age of (68.5±12.1) years old;there were 7 cases in the traditional open surgery group, including 4 males and 3 females, with an average age of (75.0±3.2) years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, incision length, visual analogue scale(VAS), activities of daily living (ADL) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), C-reactive protein(CRP) before and 1 week and 3 months after the operation, and the intervertebral fusion status on the last follow-up CT were compared between the two groups.

Results: Compared with the open surgery group, the OLIF channel group had shorter operation time (209.87±31.5) min vs. (246.0±42.7) min, less intraoperative blood loss (225.625±91.1) ml vs. (364.2±74.8) ml, and shorter incision length (6.1±1.2) vs. (14.0±1.4) cm, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Before and 1 week and 3 months after the operation, the lumbar VAS in the OLIF group were (6.3±0.6), (2.8±0.7), (1.1±0.5), and those in the traditional open surgery group were (6.4±0.6), (3.4±0.5), (1.2±0.3);the ADL scores in the OLIF group were (45.0±4.5), (60.3±4.3), (94.1±4.2), and those in the open group were (46.4±5.6), (60.7±4.5), (92.9±4.9); the ODI scores in the OLIF group were (86.3±2.9)%, (69.5±4.1)%, (23.0±3.2)%, and those in the open group were (87.3±3.8)%, (69.8±4.2)%, (23.8±3.6)%, all of which showed significant improvement(P<0.05). Three months after the operation, CRP, PCT, and ESR were significantly lower than those before the operation, and CRP and PCT returned to normal, while ESR was still slightly elevated in some patients. The last follow-up CT showed that continuous trabecular bone formation was observed between the upper and lower endplates of the surgical segments in all patients, and the fusion time was (8.7±4.5) months.

Conclusion: The OLIF channel technique combined with posterior internal fixation is a minimally invasive and effective treatment method, which can effectively control infection, relieve pain, and improve the quality of life of patients. Compared with traditional open surgery, it has the advantages of minimally invasive, shorter operation time, and less intraoperative blood loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信