对性传播感染即时检测的态度和使用:对2023年性传播感染会议与会者的调查结果

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexual health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1071/SH25003
Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Yukari C Manabe, Charlotte A Gaydos, Matthew M Hamill, Haneefa Saleem, Golsa M Yazdy, Anne M Rompalo, Susan Tuddenham
{"title":"对性传播感染即时检测的态度和使用:对2023年性传播感染会议与会者的调查结果","authors":"Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Yukari C Manabe, Charlotte A Gaydos, Matthew M Hamill, Haneefa Saleem, Golsa M Yazdy, Anne M Rompalo, Susan Tuddenham","doi":"10.1071/SH25003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have become increasingly available since the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited data on the use of these tests in clinical practice as well as the potential challenges to integrating them into care. Methods We conducted a survey of participants at an international STI conference in July 2023 to better understand the use of STI POCTs. Results A total of 83% of respondents reported using traditional POCTs (such as Gram stain and wet prep) in their practices, and 52% used newer POCTs (most commonly: rapid tests for Treponema pallidum (26%) and molecular tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae /Chlamydia trachomatis (26%)). Newer POCTs were commonly used for symptomatic (77%) and asymptomatic patients (46%), in addition to asymptomatic contacts of people with STIs (51%) and those with increased vulnerabilities (47%). Disclosure of results from newer POCTs occurred during the clinic visit for the majority of respondents (71%). When asked about the most important obstacles to using newer POCTs, cost of the test to the clinical practice or healthcare system was the most cited issue (43%), whereas concerns regarding changing or establishing new clinic workflows was the second most cited issue (23%). Most participants were 'definitely' (58%) or 'maybe' (29%) in favor of patient self-tests; however, top concerns included lack of follow-up to ensure counseling/appropriate treatment for the patient and their partner. Conclusions To meaningfully adopt newer STI POCTs, further research is needed to understand practice patterns and barriers to implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards and use of point-of-care tests for STIs: results from a survey of STI conference attendees in 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Yukari C Manabe, Charlotte A Gaydos, Matthew M Hamill, Haneefa Saleem, Golsa M Yazdy, Anne M Rompalo, Susan Tuddenham\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/SH25003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have become increasingly available since the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited data on the use of these tests in clinical practice as well as the potential challenges to integrating them into care. Methods We conducted a survey of participants at an international STI conference in July 2023 to better understand the use of STI POCTs. Results A total of 83% of respondents reported using traditional POCTs (such as Gram stain and wet prep) in their practices, and 52% used newer POCTs (most commonly: rapid tests for Treponema pallidum (26%) and molecular tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae /Chlamydia trachomatis (26%)). Newer POCTs were commonly used for symptomatic (77%) and asymptomatic patients (46%), in addition to asymptomatic contacts of people with STIs (51%) and those with increased vulnerabilities (47%). Disclosure of results from newer POCTs occurred during the clinic visit for the majority of respondents (71%). When asked about the most important obstacles to using newer POCTs, cost of the test to the clinical practice or healthcare system was the most cited issue (43%), whereas concerns regarding changing or establishing new clinic workflows was the second most cited issue (23%). Most participants were 'definitely' (58%) or 'maybe' (29%) in favor of patient self-tests; however, top concerns included lack of follow-up to ensure counseling/appropriate treatment for the patient and their partner. Conclusions To meaningfully adopt newer STI POCTs, further research is needed to understand practice patterns and barriers to implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual health\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自COVID-19大流行以来,性传播感染(sti)的即时检测(POCTs)越来越普及。关于这些测试在临床实践中的使用以及将其纳入护理的潜在挑战的数据有限。为了更好地了解STI POCTs的使用情况,我们对2023年7月国际STI会议的参与者进行了调查。结果总共83%的答复者报告在其实践中使用传统poct(如革兰氏染色和湿准备),52%使用较新的poct(最常见的是:梅毒螺旋体快速检测(26%)和淋病奈瑟菌/沙眼衣原体分子检测(26%))。较新的poct通常用于有症状(77%)和无症状患者(46%),此外还有无症状性传播感染患者(51%)和易感性增加的患者(47%)。大多数应答者(71%)在门诊就诊时披露了新poct的结果。当被问及使用新的poct最重要的障碍时,临床实践或医疗保健系统的测试成本是被引用最多的问题(43%),而改变或建立新的临床工作流程是被引用最多的问题(23%)。大多数参与者“肯定”(58%)或“可能”(29%)支持患者自我测试;然而,最令人担忧的问题包括缺乏后续行动,以确保对患者及其伴侣进行咨询/适当治疗。为了有意地采用新的STI POCTs,需要进一步研究以了解实践模式和实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes towards and use of point-of-care tests for STIs: results from a survey of STI conference attendees in 2023.

Background Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have become increasingly available since the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited data on the use of these tests in clinical practice as well as the potential challenges to integrating them into care. Methods We conducted a survey of participants at an international STI conference in July 2023 to better understand the use of STI POCTs. Results A total of 83% of respondents reported using traditional POCTs (such as Gram stain and wet prep) in their practices, and 52% used newer POCTs (most commonly: rapid tests for Treponema pallidum (26%) and molecular tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae /Chlamydia trachomatis (26%)). Newer POCTs were commonly used for symptomatic (77%) and asymptomatic patients (46%), in addition to asymptomatic contacts of people with STIs (51%) and those with increased vulnerabilities (47%). Disclosure of results from newer POCTs occurred during the clinic visit for the majority of respondents (71%). When asked about the most important obstacles to using newer POCTs, cost of the test to the clinical practice or healthcare system was the most cited issue (43%), whereas concerns regarding changing or establishing new clinic workflows was the second most cited issue (23%). Most participants were 'definitely' (58%) or 'maybe' (29%) in favor of patient self-tests; however, top concerns included lack of follow-up to ensure counseling/appropriate treatment for the patient and their partner. Conclusions To meaningfully adopt newer STI POCTs, further research is needed to understand practice patterns and barriers to implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信