烟草广告、促销和赞助对日本烟草危害性认知和加热烟草制品摄取的纵向影响:JASTIS研究结果。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kayo Togawa, Takahiro Tabuchi, Kota Katanoda
{"title":"烟草广告、促销和赞助对日本烟草危害性认知和加热烟草制品摄取的纵向影响:JASTIS研究结果。","authors":"Kayo Togawa, Takahiro Tabuchi, Kota Katanoda","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japan lacks regulations governing tobacco advertisements, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) in Japan. We investigate TAPS' impact on harm perceptions and heated tobacco products (HTPs) uptake in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample, comprising adult non-users of HTPs, was derived from a longitudinal internet-based study (JASTIS, Japanese 'Society and New Tobacco' Internet Survey) conducted in 2018 (n=7136) and 2022 (n=15 587). Participants reported whether they had noticed: (1) tobacco advertisements (eg, television, magazines), (2) promotion (eg, discounts/cashbacks), (3) sponsorship and (4) IQOS advertisements claiming reduced harm and clean air (2018 only). Additionally, they reported their perceptions of secondhand tobacco smoke and HTP aerosols, and HTP use. The uptake of HTPs was assessed in the respective follow-up surveys (2019 and 2023). Generalised estimating equation logistic regression models estimated the associations between TAPS exposure, perceived harmfulness of tobacco and subsequent HTP uptake, stratified by cigarette smoking status (never smoking (NS), former smoking (FS) and current smoking (CS)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to TAPS was associated with subsequent HTP uptake, with a notable association observed for promotion (OR<sub>NS</sub>=2.02, 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.22, OR<sub>CS</sub>=1.95, 95% CI: 1.50 to 2.54) and IQOS advertisement (OR<sub>NS</sub>=3.39, 95% CI: 1.43 to 8.08, OR<sub>FS</sub>=3.17, 95% CI: 1.53 to 6.56, OR<sub>CS</sub>=1.83, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.56). In FS, the association with promotion was observed for 2018 only (OR<sub>FS_2018</sub>=4.07, 95% CI: 1.94 to 8.53, OR<sub>FS_2022</sub>=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.41) (<i>P<sub>interaction</sub></i> =0.001). The perception that HTP use/aerosols cause minimal harm was associated with certain exposure to TAPS that was also associated with HTP uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAPS exposure may reduce perceived harm and increase HTP uptake, even among NS and FS, highlighting the need for comprehensive regulations and risk communication amid shifting public attitudes and tobacco markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal impact of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship on perceptions of harmfulness of tobacco and uptake of heated tobacco products in Japan: findings from the JASTIS study.\",\"authors\":\"Kayo Togawa, Takahiro Tabuchi, Kota Katanoda\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tc-2024-058909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Japan lacks regulations governing tobacco advertisements, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) in Japan. We investigate TAPS' impact on harm perceptions and heated tobacco products (HTPs) uptake in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample, comprising adult non-users of HTPs, was derived from a longitudinal internet-based study (JASTIS, Japanese 'Society and New Tobacco' Internet Survey) conducted in 2018 (n=7136) and 2022 (n=15 587). Participants reported whether they had noticed: (1) tobacco advertisements (eg, television, magazines), (2) promotion (eg, discounts/cashbacks), (3) sponsorship and (4) IQOS advertisements claiming reduced harm and clean air (2018 only). Additionally, they reported their perceptions of secondhand tobacco smoke and HTP aerosols, and HTP use. The uptake of HTPs was assessed in the respective follow-up surveys (2019 and 2023). Generalised estimating equation logistic regression models estimated the associations between TAPS exposure, perceived harmfulness of tobacco and subsequent HTP uptake, stratified by cigarette smoking status (never smoking (NS), former smoking (FS) and current smoking (CS)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to TAPS was associated with subsequent HTP uptake, with a notable association observed for promotion (OR<sub>NS</sub>=2.02, 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.22, OR<sub>CS</sub>=1.95, 95% CI: 1.50 to 2.54) and IQOS advertisement (OR<sub>NS</sub>=3.39, 95% CI: 1.43 to 8.08, OR<sub>FS</sub>=3.17, 95% CI: 1.53 to 6.56, OR<sub>CS</sub>=1.83, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.56). In FS, the association with promotion was observed for 2018 only (OR<sub>FS_2018</sub>=4.07, 95% CI: 1.94 to 8.53, OR<sub>FS_2022</sub>=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.41) (<i>P<sub>interaction</sub></i> =0.001). The perception that HTP use/aerosols cause minimal harm was associated with certain exposure to TAPS that was also associated with HTP uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAPS exposure may reduce perceived harm and increase HTP uptake, even among NS and FS, highlighting the need for comprehensive regulations and risk communication amid shifting public attitudes and tobacco markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058909\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日本缺乏管理烟草广告、促销和赞助(TAPS)的法规。我们在日本调查了TAPS对危害认知和加热烟草制品(HTPs)摄取的影响。方法:研究样本来自于2018年(n=7136)和2022年(n=15 587)进行的一项基于互联网的纵向研究(JASTIS,日本“社会和新烟草”互联网调查),包括成人非https用户。参与者报告了他们是否注意到:(1)烟草广告(如电视、杂志),(2)促销(如折扣/现金返还),(3)赞助和(4)声称减少危害和清洁空气的IQOS广告(仅限2018年)。此外,他们还报告了他们对二手烟草烟雾和HTP气溶胶以及HTP使用的看法。在各自的后续调查(2019年和2023年)中评估了HTPs的使用情况。根据吸烟状况(从不吸烟(NS)、曾经吸烟(FS)和目前吸烟(CS))进行分层,广义估计方程逻辑回归模型估计了TAPS暴露、感知烟草危害和随后的HTP摄取之间的关联。结果:暴露于TAPS与随后的HTP摄入相关,与促销(orn =2.02, 95% CI: 1.26至3.22,ORCS=1.95, 95% CI: 1.50至2.54)和IQOS广告(orn =3.39, 95% CI: 1.43至8.08,ORFS=3.17, 95% CI: 1.53至6.56,ORCS=1.83, 95% CI: 1.31至2.56)有显著关联。在FS中,仅在2018年观察到与晋升的关联(ORFS_2018=4.07, 95% CI: 1.94至8.53,ORFS_2022=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44至1.41)(p交互作用=0.001)。人们认为使用热tp /气溶胶造成的危害最小,这与接触一定程度的TAPS有关,而tap也与热tp摄取有关。结论:即使在NS和FS中,接触TAPS也可能减少感知伤害并增加HTP的吸收,这突出了在公众态度和烟草市场不断变化的情况下,需要全面的法规和风险沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal impact of tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship on perceptions of harmfulness of tobacco and uptake of heated tobacco products in Japan: findings from the JASTIS study.

Background: Japan lacks regulations governing tobacco advertisements, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) in Japan. We investigate TAPS' impact on harm perceptions and heated tobacco products (HTPs) uptake in Japan.

Methods: The study sample, comprising adult non-users of HTPs, was derived from a longitudinal internet-based study (JASTIS, Japanese 'Society and New Tobacco' Internet Survey) conducted in 2018 (n=7136) and 2022 (n=15 587). Participants reported whether they had noticed: (1) tobacco advertisements (eg, television, magazines), (2) promotion (eg, discounts/cashbacks), (3) sponsorship and (4) IQOS advertisements claiming reduced harm and clean air (2018 only). Additionally, they reported their perceptions of secondhand tobacco smoke and HTP aerosols, and HTP use. The uptake of HTPs was assessed in the respective follow-up surveys (2019 and 2023). Generalised estimating equation logistic regression models estimated the associations between TAPS exposure, perceived harmfulness of tobacco and subsequent HTP uptake, stratified by cigarette smoking status (never smoking (NS), former smoking (FS) and current smoking (CS)).

Results: Exposure to TAPS was associated with subsequent HTP uptake, with a notable association observed for promotion (ORNS=2.02, 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.22, ORCS=1.95, 95% CI: 1.50 to 2.54) and IQOS advertisement (ORNS=3.39, 95% CI: 1.43 to 8.08, ORFS=3.17, 95% CI: 1.53 to 6.56, ORCS=1.83, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.56). In FS, the association with promotion was observed for 2018 only (ORFS_2018=4.07, 95% CI: 1.94 to 8.53, ORFS_2022=0.79, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.41) (Pinteraction =0.001). The perception that HTP use/aerosols cause minimal harm was associated with certain exposure to TAPS that was also associated with HTP uptake.

Conclusion: TAPS exposure may reduce perceived harm and increase HTP uptake, even among NS and FS, highlighting the need for comprehensive regulations and risk communication amid shifting public attitudes and tobacco markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信