强迫性性行为与恋童癖偏好之间的关系——对治疗的启示。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfaf040
Robert Epstein, Judith Abulafia, Ortal Shukron, Yaniv Efrati
{"title":"强迫性性行为与恋童癖偏好之间的关系——对治疗的启示。","authors":"Robert Epstein, Judith Abulafia, Ortal Shukron, Yaniv Efrati","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a presumed yet untested connection between sexual compulsivity and pedophilic interest among sexual offenders against children, which has driven the widespread use of anti-libidinal treatments for high-risk offenders.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test the hypothesis that compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) and pedophilic interest are related.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 95 prisoners in treatment for sexual offenses was administered questionnaires measuring CSB, and their self-reported offense history analyzed in order to assess their level of pedophilic interest.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>All subjects were able to provide valid details of their sexual behavior and of their previous sexual offending, and there was a wide distribution of scores on both measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to the main hypothesis, the findings revealed a negative relationship between CSB and pedophilic interest. Further analysis indicated that the main factor of CSB underlying this relationship was a lack of negative affect, together with non-significant negative trends toward the unwanted consequences and affect dysregulation components of CSB in relation to pedophilic interest.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These results challenge the assumption that targeting CSB through anti-libidinal medication should be the primary intervention for offenders with elevated sexual interest in children. Instead, multifactorial approaches to sexual offending may yield more meaningful long-term effects on offender risk.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>This study is the first to explore the relationship between CSB and pedophilic interest in convicted offenders, providing valuable insights into their management and treatment. However, its findings are limited by treating pedophilic interest as a continuous variable, despite evidence suggesting it may be a taxon, potentially restricting the broader applicability of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concludes that compulsive sexual behavior and pedophilic interest are not inherently linked in incarcerated offenders. This underscores the need for nuanced, individualized treatment approaches that align with multifactorial models of sexual offending. Clinically and at the policy level, this calls for a shift away from a sole focus on anti-libidinal treatments toward interventions tailored to address the complex and varied needs of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":"13 3","pages":"qfaf040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between compulsive sexual behavior and pedophilic preference in an incarcerated sample of individuals convicted of sexual offenses-implications for treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Epstein, Judith Abulafia, Ortal Shukron, Yaniv Efrati\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sexmed/qfaf040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a presumed yet untested connection between sexual compulsivity and pedophilic interest among sexual offenders against children, which has driven the widespread use of anti-libidinal treatments for high-risk offenders.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test the hypothesis that compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) and pedophilic interest are related.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 95 prisoners in treatment for sexual offenses was administered questionnaires measuring CSB, and their self-reported offense history analyzed in order to assess their level of pedophilic interest.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>All subjects were able to provide valid details of their sexual behavior and of their previous sexual offending, and there was a wide distribution of scores on both measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to the main hypothesis, the findings revealed a negative relationship between CSB and pedophilic interest. Further analysis indicated that the main factor of CSB underlying this relationship was a lack of negative affect, together with non-significant negative trends toward the unwanted consequences and affect dysregulation components of CSB in relation to pedophilic interest.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These results challenge the assumption that targeting CSB through anti-libidinal medication should be the primary intervention for offenders with elevated sexual interest in children. Instead, multifactorial approaches to sexual offending may yield more meaningful long-term effects on offender risk.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>This study is the first to explore the relationship between CSB and pedophilic interest in convicted offenders, providing valuable insights into their management and treatment. However, its findings are limited by treating pedophilic interest as a continuous variable, despite evidence suggesting it may be a taxon, potentially restricting the broader applicability of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concludes that compulsive sexual behavior and pedophilic interest are not inherently linked in incarcerated offenders. This underscores the need for nuanced, individualized treatment approaches that align with multifactorial models of sexual offending. Clinically and at the policy level, this calls for a shift away from a sole focus on anti-libidinal treatments toward interventions tailored to address the complex and varied needs of this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"qfaf040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128926/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfaf040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfaf040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在性犯罪者对儿童的性强迫性行为和恋童癖之间存在一种假定但未经检验的联系,这促使了对高危犯罪者广泛使用抗性欲治疗。目的:验证强迫性性行为(CSB)与恋童癖兴趣相关的假设。方法:对95名性犯罪在押人员的性取向取向进行问卷调查,分析其犯罪史,评价其恋童兴趣水平。结果:所有的研究对象都能够提供他们的性行为和之前性侵犯的有效细节,并且在这两项测量中得分分布广泛。结果:与主要假设相反,研究结果显示CSB与恋童癖兴趣呈负相关。进一步的分析表明,这一关系背后的主要因素是缺乏负面情感,以及对不良后果的非显著负面趋势和与恋童癖兴趣相关的负面情感失调成分。临床意义:这些结果挑战了通过抗利比多药物靶向CSB应该是儿童性兴趣升高的罪犯的主要干预措施的假设。相反,对性侵犯采取多因素方法可能会对罪犯的风险产生更有意义的长期影响。优势和局限性:本研究首次探讨了CSB与恋童癖对罪犯的兴趣之间的关系,为他们的管理和治疗提供了有价值的见解。然而,尽管有证据表明恋童癖可能是一个分类单元,但由于将恋童癖兴趣作为一个连续变量来对待,这一发现受到了限制,这可能会限制结果的广泛适用性。结论:该研究得出结论,强迫性性行为和恋童癖的兴趣在被监禁的罪犯中并没有内在的联系。这强调了需要细致入微、个性化的治疗方法,以配合性侵犯的多因素模型。在临床和政策层面,这要求从单一的抗利比多治疗转向针对这一人群复杂和多样化需求的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between compulsive sexual behavior and pedophilic preference in an incarcerated sample of individuals convicted of sexual offenses-implications for treatment.

Background: There is a presumed yet untested connection between sexual compulsivity and pedophilic interest among sexual offenders against children, which has driven the widespread use of anti-libidinal treatments for high-risk offenders.

Aim: To test the hypothesis that compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) and pedophilic interest are related.

Methods: A group of 95 prisoners in treatment for sexual offenses was administered questionnaires measuring CSB, and their self-reported offense history analyzed in order to assess their level of pedophilic interest.

Outcomes: All subjects were able to provide valid details of their sexual behavior and of their previous sexual offending, and there was a wide distribution of scores on both measures.

Results: Contrary to the main hypothesis, the findings revealed a negative relationship between CSB and pedophilic interest. Further analysis indicated that the main factor of CSB underlying this relationship was a lack of negative affect, together with non-significant negative trends toward the unwanted consequences and affect dysregulation components of CSB in relation to pedophilic interest.

Clinical implications: These results challenge the assumption that targeting CSB through anti-libidinal medication should be the primary intervention for offenders with elevated sexual interest in children. Instead, multifactorial approaches to sexual offending may yield more meaningful long-term effects on offender risk.

Strengths and limitations: This study is the first to explore the relationship between CSB and pedophilic interest in convicted offenders, providing valuable insights into their management and treatment. However, its findings are limited by treating pedophilic interest as a continuous variable, despite evidence suggesting it may be a taxon, potentially restricting the broader applicability of the results.

Conclusions: The study concludes that compulsive sexual behavior and pedophilic interest are not inherently linked in incarcerated offenders. This underscores the need for nuanced, individualized treatment approaches that align with multifactorial models of sexual offending. Clinically and at the policy level, this calls for a shift away from a sole focus on anti-libidinal treatments toward interventions tailored to address the complex and varied needs of this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual Medicine
Sexual Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信