社交媒体在肌炎护理中的应用——一项针对肌炎患者的探索性混合方法研究(sociimyo)。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Katharina Boy, Niklas Ohm, Susann May, Greta Nordmann, Lynn Wilson, Johannes Knitza, Martin Heinze, Latika Gupta, Felix Muehlensiepen
{"title":"社交媒体在肌炎护理中的应用——一项针对肌炎患者的探索性混合方法研究(sociimyo)。","authors":"Katharina Boy, Niklas Ohm, Susann May, Greta Nordmann, Lynn Wilson, Johannes Knitza, Martin Heinze, Latika Gupta, Felix Muehlensiepen","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05903-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myositis is a rare autoimmune disease primarily affecting muscles, with potential involvement of the skin, heart, and lungs. Patients often experience delays in diagnosis, lack of adequate information, and limited support for disease management. Social media has emerged as a valuable tool to address these gaps by facilitating information exchange, peer support, and community building. However, its role in myositis care is not yet well understood. This study aims to explore how myositis patients use social media, focusing on shared content, perceived benefits and challenges, and the overall impact on disease management and emotional well-being. A mixed-methods approach was applied, including semi-structured interviews with 11 patients and a netnographic analysis of social media group dedicated to myositis care. Data were analyzed using Kuckartz's structured qualitative content analysis, with coding performed inductively, to identify key themes. Four key themes emerged: (I) Social media as a global platform for sharing experiential knowledge, particularly on symptom management, medication side effects, and coping strategies. (II) Peer support fostering a sense of belonging, emotional exchange, and mutual encouragement through structured discussions and community-driven moderation. (III) Perceived benefits, such as real-time access to patient-driven insights, shared decision-making support, and enhanced communication with healthcare providers. (IV) Perceived drawbacks, including misinformation, privacy concerns, and the absence of professional medical input. Participants emphasized the need for expert involvement to improve content reliability, while also valuing the autonomy and emotional support within these communities. Social media platforms, particularly closed groups, provide a complementary avenue to traditional care by offering support and knowledge exchange. To maximize their potential, privacy concerns and the integration of professional guidance must be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 6","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media in myositis care - an exploratory mixed-methods study among myositis patients (SociMyo).\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Boy, Niklas Ohm, Susann May, Greta Nordmann, Lynn Wilson, Johannes Knitza, Martin Heinze, Latika Gupta, Felix Muehlensiepen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05903-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Myositis is a rare autoimmune disease primarily affecting muscles, with potential involvement of the skin, heart, and lungs. Patients often experience delays in diagnosis, lack of adequate information, and limited support for disease management. Social media has emerged as a valuable tool to address these gaps by facilitating information exchange, peer support, and community building. However, its role in myositis care is not yet well understood. This study aims to explore how myositis patients use social media, focusing on shared content, perceived benefits and challenges, and the overall impact on disease management and emotional well-being. A mixed-methods approach was applied, including semi-structured interviews with 11 patients and a netnographic analysis of social media group dedicated to myositis care. Data were analyzed using Kuckartz's structured qualitative content analysis, with coding performed inductively, to identify key themes. Four key themes emerged: (I) Social media as a global platform for sharing experiential knowledge, particularly on symptom management, medication side effects, and coping strategies. (II) Peer support fostering a sense of belonging, emotional exchange, and mutual encouragement through structured discussions and community-driven moderation. (III) Perceived benefits, such as real-time access to patient-driven insights, shared decision-making support, and enhanced communication with healthcare providers. (IV) Perceived drawbacks, including misinformation, privacy concerns, and the absence of professional medical input. Participants emphasized the need for expert involvement to improve content reliability, while also valuing the autonomy and emotional support within these communities. Social media platforms, particularly closed groups, provide a complementary avenue to traditional care by offering support and knowledge exchange. To maximize their potential, privacy concerns and the integration of professional guidance must be addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05903-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05903-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌炎是一种罕见的自身免疫性疾病,主要影响肌肉,可累及皮肤、心脏和肺部。患者经常经历诊断延误,缺乏足够的信息,以及对疾病管理的有限支持。通过促进信息交流、同伴支持和社区建设,社交媒体已成为解决这些差距的宝贵工具。然而,它在肌炎治疗中的作用尚未得到很好的理解。本研究旨在探讨肌炎患者如何使用社交媒体,重点关注共享内容,感知益处和挑战,以及对疾病管理和情绪健康的总体影响。采用混合方法,包括对11名患者进行半结构化访谈和对致力于肌炎护理的社交媒体群体进行网络分析。数据分析使用库卡兹的结构化定性内容分析,编码进行归纳,以确定关键主题。出现了四个关键主题:(I)社交媒体作为分享经验知识的全球平台,特别是在症状管理、药物副作用和应对策略方面。(II)同伴支持,通过有组织的讨论和社区驱动的节制培养归属感、情感交流和相互鼓励。(III)可感知的好处,例如实时获取患者驱动的见解、共享决策支持以及加强与医疗保健提供者的沟通。(四)察觉到的缺点,包括错误信息、隐私问题和缺乏专业医疗投入。与会者强调需要专家的参与来提高内容的可靠性,同时也重视这些社区中的自主性和情感支持。社交媒体平台,特别是封闭群体,通过提供支持和知识交流,为传统护理提供了补充途径。为了最大限度地发挥其潜力,必须解决隐私问题和专业指导的整合问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social media in myositis care - an exploratory mixed-methods study among myositis patients (SociMyo).

Myositis is a rare autoimmune disease primarily affecting muscles, with potential involvement of the skin, heart, and lungs. Patients often experience delays in diagnosis, lack of adequate information, and limited support for disease management. Social media has emerged as a valuable tool to address these gaps by facilitating information exchange, peer support, and community building. However, its role in myositis care is not yet well understood. This study aims to explore how myositis patients use social media, focusing on shared content, perceived benefits and challenges, and the overall impact on disease management and emotional well-being. A mixed-methods approach was applied, including semi-structured interviews with 11 patients and a netnographic analysis of social media group dedicated to myositis care. Data were analyzed using Kuckartz's structured qualitative content analysis, with coding performed inductively, to identify key themes. Four key themes emerged: (I) Social media as a global platform for sharing experiential knowledge, particularly on symptom management, medication side effects, and coping strategies. (II) Peer support fostering a sense of belonging, emotional exchange, and mutual encouragement through structured discussions and community-driven moderation. (III) Perceived benefits, such as real-time access to patient-driven insights, shared decision-making support, and enhanced communication with healthcare providers. (IV) Perceived drawbacks, including misinformation, privacy concerns, and the absence of professional medical input. Participants emphasized the need for expert involvement to improve content reliability, while also valuing the autonomy and emotional support within these communities. Social media platforms, particularly closed groups, provide a complementary avenue to traditional care by offering support and knowledge exchange. To maximize their potential, privacy concerns and the integration of professional guidance must be addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信