光动力疗法作为切除和再生手术治疗种植体周围炎的辅助疗法:72例患者随访18个月的前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Volkan Arısan, Alper Sağlanmak, Ata Anıl, S Volkan Arıcı, Anton Sculean
{"title":"光动力疗法作为切除和再生手术治疗种植体周围炎的辅助疗法:72例患者随访18个月的前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Volkan Arısan, Alper Sağlanmak, Ata Anıl, S Volkan Arıcı, Anton Sculean","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to resective and regenerative surgical peri-implantitis treatment (open flap debridement via scaling and smoothening of the implant surface [implantoplasty]) combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in a patient cohort of a university clinic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients were treated with either conventional therapy (CON) or conventional therapy plus PDT. CON included mechanical debridement, implantoplasty, and GBR. Clinical parameters, including marginal bone level (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome was the resolution of the infection using a composite success criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 18 months, infection resolution rates were 75% for CON and 80% for PDT groups (p = 0.75). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference for the infection resolution between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.6221). Both groups demonstrated statistically significant MBL gain after 6 months (mean 2.59 mm ± 1.25), with no statistically significant differences between groups throughout the follow-up. PPD was statistically significantly lower in the PDT group (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.018). BOP scores decreased initially but showed an increasing trend in both groups over time (chi-squared test, p = 0.045), with no statistically significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT as an adjunct to conventional peri-implantitis treatment with GBR resulted in statistically significantly lower PPD values. However, no additional benefits were observed for infection resolution, maintenance of infection-free status, MBL or BOP. Initial improvements in both groups followed by gradual recurrences in clinical parameters over 18 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"23 ","pages":"305-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Resective and Regenerative Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Prospective Cohort of 72 Patients Followed for 18 Months.\",\"authors\":\"Volkan Arısan, Alper Sağlanmak, Ata Anıl, S Volkan Arıcı, Anton Sculean\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to resective and regenerative surgical peri-implantitis treatment (open flap debridement via scaling and smoothening of the implant surface [implantoplasty]) combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in a patient cohort of a university clinic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients were treated with either conventional therapy (CON) or conventional therapy plus PDT. CON included mechanical debridement, implantoplasty, and GBR. Clinical parameters, including marginal bone level (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome was the resolution of the infection using a composite success criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 18 months, infection resolution rates were 75% for CON and 80% for PDT groups (p = 0.75). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference for the infection resolution between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.6221). Both groups demonstrated statistically significant MBL gain after 6 months (mean 2.59 mm ± 1.25), with no statistically significant differences between groups throughout the follow-up. PPD was statistically significantly lower in the PDT group (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.018). BOP scores decreased initially but showed an increasing trend in both groups over time (chi-squared test, p = 0.045), with no statistically significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT as an adjunct to conventional peri-implantitis treatment with GBR resulted in statistically significantly lower PPD values. However, no additional benefits were observed for infection resolution, maintenance of infection-free status, MBL or BOP. Initial improvements in both groups followed by gradual recurrences in clinical parameters over 18 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral health & preventive dentistry\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"305-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral health & preventive dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价光动力疗法(PDT)作为切除和再生手术种植体周围炎治疗(通过刮除和平滑种植体表面的开放皮瓣清创[种植成形术])结合引导骨再生(GBR)的辅助治疗的疗效。材料与方法:72例患者接受常规治疗(CON)或常规治疗加PDT治疗。CON包括机械清创、种植成形术和GBR。在基线、6、12和18个月评估临床参数,包括边缘骨水平(MBL)、探针袋深度(PPD)和探针出血(BOP)。主要结果是使用综合成功标准解决感染。结果:18个月后,CON组感染清除率为75%,PDT组为80% (p = 0.75)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,两组间感染分辨率差异无统计学意义(log-rank检验,p = 0.6221)。6个月后两组MBL均有显著增加(平均2.59 mm±1.25),随访期间两组间无显著差异。PDT组PPD显著低于PDT组(p = 0.018)。BOP评分开始时下降,但随着时间的推移,两组均呈上升趋势(卡方检验,p = 0.045),组间差异无统计学意义。结论:PDT作为常规GBR治疗种植体周围炎的辅助治疗,可显著降低PPD值。然而,在解决感染、维持无感染状态、MBL或BOP方面没有观察到额外的益处。两组患者最初均有改善,随后临床参数在18个月内逐渐复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Resective and Regenerative Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Prospective Cohort of 72 Patients Followed for 18 Months.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to resective and regenerative surgical peri-implantitis treatment (open flap debridement via scaling and smoothening of the implant surface [implantoplasty]) combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in a patient cohort of a university clinic.

Materials and methods: Seventy-two patients were treated with either conventional therapy (CON) or conventional therapy plus PDT. CON included mechanical debridement, implantoplasty, and GBR. Clinical parameters, including marginal bone level (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome was the resolution of the infection using a composite success criterion.

Results: After 18 months, infection resolution rates were 75% for CON and 80% for PDT groups (p = 0.75). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference for the infection resolution between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.6221). Both groups demonstrated statistically significant MBL gain after 6 months (mean 2.59 mm ± 1.25), with no statistically significant differences between groups throughout the follow-up. PPD was statistically significantly lower in the PDT group (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.018). BOP scores decreased initially but showed an increasing trend in both groups over time (chi-squared test, p = 0.045), with no statistically significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: PDT as an adjunct to conventional peri-implantitis treatment with GBR resulted in statistically significantly lower PPD values. However, no additional benefits were observed for infection resolution, maintenance of infection-free status, MBL or BOP. Initial improvements in both groups followed by gradual recurrences in clinical parameters over 18 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信