Neha S Joshi, Kenneth M Zangwill, Henry C Lee, Peter Mendel, Chau Pham, Megan Schuler, Nabeel Qureshi, Natalie Chapkis, Allison Henry, Kurlen S E Payton
{"title":"因子小插曲描述疑似早发脓毒症实践变化在多中心新生儿重症监护室抗生素管理协作。","authors":"Neha S Joshi, Kenneth M Zangwill, Henry C Lee, Peter Mendel, Chau Pham, Megan Schuler, Nabeel Qureshi, Natalie Chapkis, Allison Henry, Kurlen S E Payton","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02325-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe provider practice preferences for term infants with suspected early-onset sepsis and preference change over time during a multicenter antibiotic stewardship collaborative.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Factorial case vignette surveys conducted at baseline of a quality improvement collaborative, and follow up after the 12 month collaborative intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and follow up surveys were completed by 252 (72%) and 195 (55%) respondents, respectively. The results describe both areas of compliance and non-compliance with national guidelines. There was a reduction in likelihood of ordering laboratory testing between surveys (p values ranging <0.001-0.033). A stewardship score was calculated and the mean score moved towards more stewardship friendly practices (0.39 vs 0.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified specific antibiotic use practice variations as potential targets for improving clinician prescribing practice in the NICU setting. Respondents moved towards more antibiotic stewardship friendly practices from baseline to the follow up survey. Vignettes methods may help optimize quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factorial vignettes describe suspected early onset sepsis practice variation in a multicenter NICU antibiotic stewardship collaborative.\",\"authors\":\"Neha S Joshi, Kenneth M Zangwill, Henry C Lee, Peter Mendel, Chau Pham, Megan Schuler, Nabeel Qureshi, Natalie Chapkis, Allison Henry, Kurlen S E Payton\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41372-025-02325-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe provider practice preferences for term infants with suspected early-onset sepsis and preference change over time during a multicenter antibiotic stewardship collaborative.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Factorial case vignette surveys conducted at baseline of a quality improvement collaborative, and follow up after the 12 month collaborative intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and follow up surveys were completed by 252 (72%) and 195 (55%) respondents, respectively. The results describe both areas of compliance and non-compliance with national guidelines. There was a reduction in likelihood of ordering laboratory testing between surveys (p values ranging <0.001-0.033). A stewardship score was calculated and the mean score moved towards more stewardship friendly practices (0.39 vs 0.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified specific antibiotic use practice variations as potential targets for improving clinician prescribing practice in the NICU setting. Respondents moved towards more antibiotic stewardship friendly practices from baseline to the follow up survey. Vignettes methods may help optimize quality improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02325-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02325-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factorial vignettes describe suspected early onset sepsis practice variation in a multicenter NICU antibiotic stewardship collaborative.
Objective: To describe provider practice preferences for term infants with suspected early-onset sepsis and preference change over time during a multicenter antibiotic stewardship collaborative.
Study design: Factorial case vignette surveys conducted at baseline of a quality improvement collaborative, and follow up after the 12 month collaborative intervention.
Results: Baseline and follow up surveys were completed by 252 (72%) and 195 (55%) respondents, respectively. The results describe both areas of compliance and non-compliance with national guidelines. There was a reduction in likelihood of ordering laboratory testing between surveys (p values ranging <0.001-0.033). A stewardship score was calculated and the mean score moved towards more stewardship friendly practices (0.39 vs 0.30).
Conclusion: We identified specific antibiotic use practice variations as potential targets for improving clinician prescribing practice in the NICU setting. Respondents moved towards more antibiotic stewardship friendly practices from baseline to the follow up survey. Vignettes methods may help optimize quality improvement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development.
The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.