Maeve Masterson, Vinay Krishnan, Ahilan Kuganesan, Mohamed K Badawy
{"title":"一种室内儿科CT固定装置的开发和初步评估。","authors":"Maeve Masterson, Vinay Krishnan, Ahilan Kuganesan, Mohamed K Badawy","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paediatric imaging often requires immobilisation to reduce motion artefacts, reduce the risk of repeat imaging and subsequently reduce patient radiation exposure. Commercial immobilisation devices may be expensive and infrequently used, making them difficult to justify for institutions with budget constraints. This study aimed to design and evaluate a cost-effective, in-house alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-house CT immobilisation device was developed using acrylic and polyethylene foam, tailored for newborns under 5 kg. Image quality was assessed using a Gammex ACR phantom on a CT scanner. Hounsfield units, noise and artefacts were compared between the in-house and commercial devices. Artefacts were independently evaluated by a radiographer and a medical physicist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The in-house device performed comparably to the commercial version, with uniformity deviation within 2 HU and noise within 2.4 SD of baseline values; artefacts were minimal for both devices. There was no significant difference between the two immobilisation devices (p = 0.711). Stability concerns with the in-house device's square base could be resolved using immobilisation straps, and future iterations should address the foam insert's porous nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-house CT immobilisation device offers a cost-effective alternative without compromising image quality, making it a viable option for healthcare institutions with limited budgets. However, its implementation would require further clinical evaluation and compliance with local regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Initial Evaluation of an In-House Paediatric CT Immobilisation Device.\",\"authors\":\"Maeve Masterson, Vinay Krishnan, Ahilan Kuganesan, Mohamed K Badawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paediatric imaging often requires immobilisation to reduce motion artefacts, reduce the risk of repeat imaging and subsequently reduce patient radiation exposure. Commercial immobilisation devices may be expensive and infrequently used, making them difficult to justify for institutions with budget constraints. This study aimed to design and evaluate a cost-effective, in-house alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-house CT immobilisation device was developed using acrylic and polyethylene foam, tailored for newborns under 5 kg. Image quality was assessed using a Gammex ACR phantom on a CT scanner. Hounsfield units, noise and artefacts were compared between the in-house and commercial devices. Artefacts were independently evaluated by a radiographer and a medical physicist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The in-house device performed comparably to the commercial version, with uniformity deviation within 2 HU and noise within 2.4 SD of baseline values; artefacts were minimal for both devices. There was no significant difference between the two immobilisation devices (p = 0.711). Stability concerns with the in-house device's square base could be resolved using immobilisation straps, and future iterations should address the foam insert's porous nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-house CT immobilisation device offers a cost-effective alternative without compromising image quality, making it a viable option for healthcare institutions with limited budgets. However, its implementation would require further clinical evaluation and compliance with local regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Initial Evaluation of an In-House Paediatric CT Immobilisation Device.
Introduction: Paediatric imaging often requires immobilisation to reduce motion artefacts, reduce the risk of repeat imaging and subsequently reduce patient radiation exposure. Commercial immobilisation devices may be expensive and infrequently used, making them difficult to justify for institutions with budget constraints. This study aimed to design and evaluate a cost-effective, in-house alternative.
Methods: An in-house CT immobilisation device was developed using acrylic and polyethylene foam, tailored for newborns under 5 kg. Image quality was assessed using a Gammex ACR phantom on a CT scanner. Hounsfield units, noise and artefacts were compared between the in-house and commercial devices. Artefacts were independently evaluated by a radiographer and a medical physicist.
Results: The in-house device performed comparably to the commercial version, with uniformity deviation within 2 HU and noise within 2.4 SD of baseline values; artefacts were minimal for both devices. There was no significant difference between the two immobilisation devices (p = 0.711). Stability concerns with the in-house device's square base could be resolved using immobilisation straps, and future iterations should address the foam insert's porous nature.
Conclusion: The in-house CT immobilisation device offers a cost-effective alternative without compromising image quality, making it a viable option for healthcare institutions with limited budgets. However, its implementation would require further clinical evaluation and compliance with local regulations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).