人工智能在期刊投稿内部道德检查中的应用前景。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fatima Alnaimat, Abdel Rahman Feras AlSamhori, Omar Hamdan, Birzhan Seiil, Ainur B Qumar
{"title":"人工智能在期刊投稿内部道德检查中的应用前景。","authors":"Fatima Alnaimat, Abdel Rahman Feras AlSamhori, Omar Hamdan, Birzhan Seiil, Ainur B Qumar","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown its ability to transform academic writing and publishing. It offers significant benefits, including enhancing efficiency, consistency, and integrity, However, these advancements are accompanied by ethical concerns (particularly around authorship, originality, and transparency) and the need for human oversight in peer review and editorial processes. In this study we explore AI for ethics checks in journal submissions. Specific AI platforms-such as YesChat for bias detection, Turnitin's iThenticate for plagiarism, Proofig for image integrity, and GPTZero for AI-generated content-can identify ethical breaches through tailored prompts and queries. Additionally, AI is increasingly used to detect missing or vague ethics statements, conflicts of interest, and citation manipulation by analyzing structured text and databases. AI-enhanced tools like Elsevier's Editorial Manager and Enago Read assist in ensuring compliance with journal-specific ethical guidelines and streamline peer review. Moreover, emerging algorithms, such as CIDRE, have shown promise in identifying abnormal citation behaviors. As AI accuracy improves, these platforms are expected to be integrated directly into submission systems, enhancing research integrity, transparency, and accountability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 21","pages":"e170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions.\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Alnaimat, Abdel Rahman Feras AlSamhori, Omar Hamdan, Birzhan Seiil, Ainur B Qumar\",\"doi\":\"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown its ability to transform academic writing and publishing. It offers significant benefits, including enhancing efficiency, consistency, and integrity, However, these advancements are accompanied by ethical concerns (particularly around authorship, originality, and transparency) and the need for human oversight in peer review and editorial processes. In this study we explore AI for ethics checks in journal submissions. Specific AI platforms-such as YesChat for bias detection, Turnitin's iThenticate for plagiarism, Proofig for image integrity, and GPTZero for AI-generated content-can identify ethical breaches through tailored prompts and queries. Additionally, AI is increasingly used to detect missing or vague ethics statements, conflicts of interest, and citation manipulation by analyzing structured text and databases. AI-enhanced tools like Elsevier's Editorial Manager and Enago Read assist in ensuring compliance with journal-specific ethical guidelines and streamline peer review. Moreover, emerging algorithms, such as CIDRE, have shown promise in identifying abnormal citation behaviors. As AI accuracy improves, these platforms are expected to be integrated directly into submission systems, enhancing research integrity, transparency, and accountability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 21\",\"pages\":\"e170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133599/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)已经显示出其改变学术写作和出版的能力。它提供了显著的好处,包括提高效率、一致性和完整性。然而,这些进步伴随着道德问题(特别是在作者身份、原创性和透明度方面),以及在同行评审和编辑过程中需要人工监督。在这项研究中,我们探讨了人工智能在期刊投稿中的伦理检查。特定的人工智能平台——例如用于偏见检测的YesChat、用于剽窃的Turnitin的iThenticate、用于图像完整性的proprog和用于人工智能生成内容的GPTZero——可以通过定制的提示和查询来识别道德违规行为。此外,人工智能越来越多地用于通过分析结构化文本和数据库来检测缺失或模糊的伦理声明、利益冲突和引文操纵。人工智能增强的工具,如爱思唯尔的编辑经理和Enago Read,有助于确保遵守特定期刊的道德准则,并简化同行评审。此外,新兴算法,如CIDRE,在识别异常引用行为方面表现出了希望。随着人工智能准确性的提高,这些平台有望直接集成到提交系统中,从而提高研究的完整性、透明度和问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown its ability to transform academic writing and publishing. It offers significant benefits, including enhancing efficiency, consistency, and integrity, However, these advancements are accompanied by ethical concerns (particularly around authorship, originality, and transparency) and the need for human oversight in peer review and editorial processes. In this study we explore AI for ethics checks in journal submissions. Specific AI platforms-such as YesChat for bias detection, Turnitin's iThenticate for plagiarism, Proofig for image integrity, and GPTZero for AI-generated content-can identify ethical breaches through tailored prompts and queries. Additionally, AI is increasingly used to detect missing or vague ethics statements, conflicts of interest, and citation manipulation by analyzing structured text and databases. AI-enhanced tools like Elsevier's Editorial Manager and Enago Read assist in ensuring compliance with journal-specific ethical guidelines and streamline peer review. Moreover, emerging algorithms, such as CIDRE, have shown promise in identifying abnormal citation behaviors. As AI accuracy improves, these platforms are expected to be integrated directly into submission systems, enhancing research integrity, transparency, and accountability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信