活性基质金属蛋白酶-8即时口腔冲洗试验与牙周病例错误分类相关的临床特征

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mengning Bi, Yu Xie, Xiaoyu Yu, Hairui Li, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Yuan Li, Maurizio S Tonetti
{"title":"活性基质金属蛋白酶-8即时口腔冲洗试验与牙周病例错误分类相关的临床特征","authors":"Mengning Bi, Yu Xie, Xiaoyu Yu, Hairui Li, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Yuan Li, Maurizio S Tonetti","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnostic performance of active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for periodontitis needs to be improved because of its relatively low sensitivity. This study attempted to identify the clinical features associated with the misclassification of periodontal cases by the test.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This work consisted of two cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy studies involving a representative cohort in Hong Kong, China, and a convenience sample of subjects in Shanghai, China. The outcomes of the aMMP-8 POC-ORT (index test) were compared to the case definitions of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal health status (reference test). The analysis reports the diagnostic accuracy parameters, the Youden index and correlations between the aMMP-8 test outcomes and clinical features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 384 and 390 subjects were enrolled in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively. The conventional 20 ng/mL threshold failed to detect more than 50% of early-stage (I/II) cases. The positive POC-ORT results were significantly correlated with the number of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm, PPD ≥ 5 mm, PPD ≥ 4 mm and BOP, PPD ≥ 5 mm and BOP and clinical attachment loss. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a positive test increased with the number of sites with PPD ≥ 5 mm: 1.092 (95% CI: 1.063-1.127, p < 0.001) for the Hong Kong sample and 1.074 (95% CI: 1.050-1.100, p < 0.001) for the Shanghai sample, suggesting a higher likelihood of a positive result with each additional pocket ≥ 5 mm. The same was observed for PPD ≥ 5 mm with BOP: 1.093 (95% CI: 1.064-1.129, p < 0.001) and 1.077 (95% CI: 1.052-1.105, p < 0.001). Notably, the false-negative cases were characterised by a significantly smaller number of periodontal pockets, BOP percentages and bleeding pockets than the true-positive ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The false-negative cases, which are responsible for the observed low sensitivity of the POC-ORT, showed more localised periodontal inflammation and pocketing. As the oral rinse test measures the overall level of aMMP-8 cleared by the gingival crevicular fluid from various lesions throughout the whole dentition, localised periodontitis appears more difficult to detect. Additional studies are needed to optimise the sampling strategy and set the cut-off value of a positive test.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (IRB Approval: UW22-132; trial registration: NCT03928080) and the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Ethics Committee (IRB Approval: SH9H-2021-T408-3; trial registration: NCT05513599).</p>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test.\",\"authors\":\"Mengning Bi, Yu Xie, Xiaoyu Yu, Hairui Li, George Pelekos, Lijian Jin, Yuan Li, Maurizio S Tonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.14189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnostic performance of active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for periodontitis needs to be improved because of its relatively low sensitivity. This study attempted to identify the clinical features associated with the misclassification of periodontal cases by the test.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This work consisted of two cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy studies involving a representative cohort in Hong Kong, China, and a convenience sample of subjects in Shanghai, China. The outcomes of the aMMP-8 POC-ORT (index test) were compared to the case definitions of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal health status (reference test). The analysis reports the diagnostic accuracy parameters, the Youden index and correlations between the aMMP-8 test outcomes and clinical features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 384 and 390 subjects were enrolled in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively. The conventional 20 ng/mL threshold failed to detect more than 50% of early-stage (I/II) cases. The positive POC-ORT results were significantly correlated with the number of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm, PPD ≥ 5 mm, PPD ≥ 4 mm and BOP, PPD ≥ 5 mm and BOP and clinical attachment loss. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a positive test increased with the number of sites with PPD ≥ 5 mm: 1.092 (95% CI: 1.063-1.127, p < 0.001) for the Hong Kong sample and 1.074 (95% CI: 1.050-1.100, p < 0.001) for the Shanghai sample, suggesting a higher likelihood of a positive result with each additional pocket ≥ 5 mm. The same was observed for PPD ≥ 5 mm with BOP: 1.093 (95% CI: 1.064-1.129, p < 0.001) and 1.077 (95% CI: 1.052-1.105, p < 0.001). Notably, the false-negative cases were characterised by a significantly smaller number of periodontal pockets, BOP percentages and bleeding pockets than the true-positive ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The false-negative cases, which are responsible for the observed low sensitivity of the POC-ORT, showed more localised periodontal inflammation and pocketing. As the oral rinse test measures the overall level of aMMP-8 cleared by the gingival crevicular fluid from various lesions throughout the whole dentition, localised periodontitis appears more difficult to detect. Additional studies are needed to optimise the sampling strategy and set the cut-off value of a positive test.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (IRB Approval: UW22-132; trial registration: NCT03928080) and the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Ethics Committee (IRB Approval: SH9H-2021-T408-3; trial registration: NCT05513599).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14189\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:活性基质金属蛋白酶-8 (aMMP-8)点护理口腔冲洗试验(POC-ORT)对牙周炎的诊断敏感性较低,有待提高。本研究试图通过测试来确定与牙周病例错误分类相关的临床特征。方法:这项工作包括两项横断面诊断准确性研究,涉及中国香港的代表性队列和中国上海的方便样本。将aMMP-8 POC-ORT(指数测试)的结果与2017年世界牙周健康状况分类研讨会(参考测试)的病例定义进行比较。分析报告了诊断准确性参数、约登指数以及aMMP-8检测结果与临床特征之间的相关性。结果:本研究在香港和上海分别入组384名和390名受试者。常规的20 ng/mL阈值未能检测出50%以上的早期(I/II)病例。POC-ORT阳性结果与探针出血部位(BOP)、探针袋深度(PPD)≥4 mm、PPD≥5 mm、PPD≥4 mm、BOP、PPD≥5 mm、BOP及临床附着丧失显著相关。校正优势比(OR)随着PPD≥5 mm的位点数量的增加而增加:1.092 (95% CI: 1.063-1.127, p)。结论:假阴性患者表现出更多的局部牙周炎症和袋袋,这是POC-ORT检测灵敏度较低的原因。由于口腔冲洗试验测量的是全牙列不同病变的龈沟液清除的aMMP-8的总体水平,因此局部牙周炎似乎更难发现。需要进一步的研究来优化抽样策略并设置阳性测试的临界值。试验注册:该研究已获得香港大学/医院管理局香港西区分组机构审查委员会批准(IRB批准:UW22-132;试验注册:NCT03928080)和上海市第九人民医院伦理委员会(IRB批准:SH9H-2021-T408-3;试验注册:NCT05513599)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test.

Background: The diagnostic performance of active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for periodontitis needs to be improved because of its relatively low sensitivity. This study attempted to identify the clinical features associated with the misclassification of periodontal cases by the test.

Method: This work consisted of two cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy studies involving a representative cohort in Hong Kong, China, and a convenience sample of subjects in Shanghai, China. The outcomes of the aMMP-8 POC-ORT (index test) were compared to the case definitions of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal health status (reference test). The analysis reports the diagnostic accuracy parameters, the Youden index and correlations between the aMMP-8 test outcomes and clinical features.

Results: In this study, 384 and 390 subjects were enrolled in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively. The conventional 20 ng/mL threshold failed to detect more than 50% of early-stage (I/II) cases. The positive POC-ORT results were significantly correlated with the number of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm, PPD ≥ 5 mm, PPD ≥ 4 mm and BOP, PPD ≥ 5 mm and BOP and clinical attachment loss. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a positive test increased with the number of sites with PPD ≥ 5 mm: 1.092 (95% CI: 1.063-1.127, p < 0.001) for the Hong Kong sample and 1.074 (95% CI: 1.050-1.100, p < 0.001) for the Shanghai sample, suggesting a higher likelihood of a positive result with each additional pocket ≥ 5 mm. The same was observed for PPD ≥ 5 mm with BOP: 1.093 (95% CI: 1.064-1.129, p < 0.001) and 1.077 (95% CI: 1.052-1.105, p < 0.001). Notably, the false-negative cases were characterised by a significantly smaller number of periodontal pockets, BOP percentages and bleeding pockets than the true-positive ones.

Conclusions: The false-negative cases, which are responsible for the observed low sensitivity of the POC-ORT, showed more localised periodontal inflammation and pocketing. As the oral rinse test measures the overall level of aMMP-8 cleared by the gingival crevicular fluid from various lesions throughout the whole dentition, localised periodontitis appears more difficult to detect. Additional studies are needed to optimise the sampling strategy and set the cut-off value of a positive test.

Trial registration: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (IRB Approval: UW22-132; trial registration: NCT03928080) and the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Ethics Committee (IRB Approval: SH9H-2021-T408-3; trial registration: NCT05513599).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信