围手术期心理干预对减少术后疼痛强度、抑郁、焦虑和疼痛灾难的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002157
Juan R Castaño-Asins, Alberto Barceló-Soler, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Vanesa García, Randy Neblett, Antonio Bulbena, Víctor Pérez-Solà, Antonio Montes-Pérez, Gerard Urrútia, Albert Feliu-Soler, Juan V Luciano
{"title":"围手术期心理干预对减少术后疼痛强度、抑郁、焦虑和疼痛灾难的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Juan R Castaño-Asins, Alberto Barceló-Soler, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Vanesa García, Randy Neblett, Antonio Bulbena, Víctor Pérez-Solà, Antonio Montes-Pérez, Gerard Urrútia, Albert Feliu-Soler, Juan V Luciano","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that psychological interventions during the peri-operative period can help reduce the development of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP); however, there is no evidence of their effects on other important pain-related variables.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of peri-operative psychological interventions for the reduction of postsurgical pain intensity, depression, anxiety, stress and pain catastrophising.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses (registration number: CRD42023403384). The search for studies was carried out in Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL up to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>RCTs comparing peri-operative psychological interventions with usual care or nonpsychological control interventions in adult patients with any type of surgery. The main outcome was pain intensity reduction after surgery. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported depression, anxiety, stress and pain catastrophising after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs (psychological intervention: 1462 patients; control: 1528 patients) were included in the systematic review and 17 studies for the meta-analysis. Random-effect models were used to combine the effect sizes of the studies. Compared with usual care or control interventions, psychological interventions reduced pain intensity, d = -0.45 95% CI, (-0.77 to -0.13) and anxiety, d = -0.33 95% CI, (-0.54 to -0.11) after surgery. Moderator analyses revealed that psychological interventions delivered by a psychologist were more effective than those delivered by other professionals. CBT seemed the most beneficial for surgical patients. The findings in other moderator analyses were heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate-quality evidence exists that peri-operative psychological interventions can significantly reduce pain intensity and anxiety postsurgery. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the presence of a high risk of bias in many trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 7","pages":"609-625"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of peri-operative psychological interventions for the reduction of postsurgical pain intensity, depression, anxiety and pain catastrophising: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Juan R Castaño-Asins, Alberto Barceló-Soler, Estíbaliz Royuela-Colomer, Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Vanesa García, Randy Neblett, Antonio Bulbena, Víctor Pérez-Solà, Antonio Montes-Pérez, Gerard Urrútia, Albert Feliu-Soler, Juan V Luciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that psychological interventions during the peri-operative period can help reduce the development of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP); however, there is no evidence of their effects on other important pain-related variables.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of peri-operative psychological interventions for the reduction of postsurgical pain intensity, depression, anxiety, stress and pain catastrophising.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses (registration number: CRD42023403384). The search for studies was carried out in Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL up to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>RCTs comparing peri-operative psychological interventions with usual care or nonpsychological control interventions in adult patients with any type of surgery. The main outcome was pain intensity reduction after surgery. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported depression, anxiety, stress and pain catastrophising after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs (psychological intervention: 1462 patients; control: 1528 patients) were included in the systematic review and 17 studies for the meta-analysis. Random-effect models were used to combine the effect sizes of the studies. Compared with usual care or control interventions, psychological interventions reduced pain intensity, d = -0.45 95% CI, (-0.77 to -0.13) and anxiety, d = -0.33 95% CI, (-0.54 to -0.11) after surgery. Moderator analyses revealed that psychological interventions delivered by a psychologist were more effective than those delivered by other professionals. CBT seemed the most beneficial for surgical patients. The findings in other moderator analyses were heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderate-quality evidence exists that peri-operative psychological interventions can significantly reduce pain intensity and anxiety postsurgery. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the presence of a high risk of bias in many trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"42 7\",\"pages\":\"609-625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002157\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有证据表明围手术期的心理干预有助于减少慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)的发生;然而,没有证据表明它们对其他重要的疼痛相关变量有影响。目的:本系统回顾和荟萃分析评估围手术期心理干预对减少术后疼痛强度、抑郁、焦虑、压力和疼痛灾难的有效性。研究设计:采用meta分析的随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统评价(注册号:CRD42023403384)。到2023年3月,在Web of Science、PsychINFO、MEDLINE和CINAHL上进行了研究检索。入选标准:对任何类型手术的成年患者围手术期心理干预与常规护理或非心理控制干预进行比较的随机对照试验。主要结果是术后疼痛强度减轻。次要结果包括术后患者报告的抑郁、焦虑、压力和疼痛。结果:27项随机对照试验(心理干预1462例;对照:1528例患者)纳入系统评价,17项研究纳入荟萃分析。随机效应模型用于合并研究的效应量。与常规护理或对照干预相比,心理干预降低了术后疼痛强度(d = -0.45 95% CI,(-0.77 ~ -0.13))和焦虑程度(d = -0.33 95% CI,(-0.54 ~ -0.11))。调节分析显示,心理学家提供的心理干预比其他专业人士提供的更有效。CBT似乎对手术患者最有益。其他调节分析的结果是异质的。结论:有中等质量的证据表明围术期心理干预可显著降低术后疼痛强度和焦虑。然而,由于在许多试验中存在较高的偏倚风险,结果应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of peri-operative psychological interventions for the reduction of postsurgical pain intensity, depression, anxiety and pain catastrophising: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Evidence suggests that psychological interventions during the peri-operative period can help reduce the development of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP); however, there is no evidence of their effects on other important pain-related variables.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of peri-operative psychological interventions for the reduction of postsurgical pain intensity, depression, anxiety, stress and pain catastrophising.

Study design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analyses (registration number: CRD42023403384). The search for studies was carried out in Web of Science, PsychINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL up to March 2023.

Eligibility criteria: RCTs comparing peri-operative psychological interventions with usual care or nonpsychological control interventions in adult patients with any type of surgery. The main outcome was pain intensity reduction after surgery. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported depression, anxiety, stress and pain catastrophising after surgery.

Results: Twenty-seven RCTs (psychological intervention: 1462 patients; control: 1528 patients) were included in the systematic review and 17 studies for the meta-analysis. Random-effect models were used to combine the effect sizes of the studies. Compared with usual care or control interventions, psychological interventions reduced pain intensity, d = -0.45 95% CI, (-0.77 to -0.13) and anxiety, d = -0.33 95% CI, (-0.54 to -0.11) after surgery. Moderator analyses revealed that psychological interventions delivered by a psychologist were more effective than those delivered by other professionals. CBT seemed the most beneficial for surgical patients. The findings in other moderator analyses were heterogeneous.

Conclusions: Moderate-quality evidence exists that peri-operative psychological interventions can significantly reduce pain intensity and anxiety postsurgery. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the presence of a high risk of bias in many trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信