封闭技术对NeoSEALER Flo生物陶瓷封口剂进入牙本质小管的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微对比研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Huda Ashri, Abeer H Mahran, Ahmed Abuelezz, Tarek Elsewify
{"title":"封闭技术对NeoSEALER Flo生物陶瓷封口剂进入牙本质小管的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微对比研究。","authors":"Huda Ashri, Abeer H Mahran, Ahmed Abuelezz, Tarek Elsewify","doi":"10.14744/eej.2025.82905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the dentinal tubule penetration of NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealer using single cone and cold lateral compaction obturation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into two groups (n=9) according to the obturation technique used. The maximum penetration depth in microns, percentage of penetration depth, and percentage of penetration area of the NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealer were assessed using confocal laser scanning microscopy at different root levels; coronal, middle, and apical. Data was statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis's test followed by Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction and Friedman's test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test with the significance level set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single cone obturation technique has shown a statistically significantly higher percentage area of NeoSEALER Flo penetration than the lateral compaction technique at the coronal root level only. Otherwise, both obturation techniques have shown no statistically significant differences in NeoSEALER Flo penetration distance, percentage of penetration distance, and percentage of area penetration at the middle and apical root levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The single cone obturation technique can be used with bioceramic sealers yielding comparable results to the cold lateral compaction technique. (EEJ-2024-12-192).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 3","pages":"222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Obturation Technique on NeoSEALER Flo Bioceramic Sealer Penetration into Dentinal Tubules: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.\",\"authors\":\"Huda Ashri, Abeer H Mahran, Ahmed Abuelezz, Tarek Elsewify\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2025.82905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the dentinal tubule penetration of NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealer using single cone and cold lateral compaction obturation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into two groups (n=9) according to the obturation technique used. The maximum penetration depth in microns, percentage of penetration depth, and percentage of penetration area of the NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealer were assessed using confocal laser scanning microscopy at different root levels; coronal, middle, and apical. Data was statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis's test followed by Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction and Friedman's test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test with the significance level set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single cone obturation technique has shown a statistically significantly higher percentage area of NeoSEALER Flo penetration than the lateral compaction technique at the coronal root level only. Otherwise, both obturation techniques have shown no statistically significant differences in NeoSEALER Flo penetration distance, percentage of penetration distance, and percentage of area penetration at the middle and apical root levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The single cone obturation technique can be used with bioceramic sealers yielding comparable results to the cold lateral compaction technique. (EEJ-2024-12-192).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"222-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.82905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.82905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较NeoSEALER Flo生物陶瓷封闭剂在单锥封闭和冷侧压实封闭两种封闭技术下对牙髓小管的渗透效果。方法:18颗拔除的单根下颌前磨牙,根据采用的封闭方法随机分为两组(n=9)。采用激光共聚焦扫描显微镜对NeoSEALER Flo生物陶瓷封口剂在不同根部水平的最大穿透深度(微米)、穿透深度百分比和穿透面积百分比进行了评估;冠状,中间和顶端。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Dunn事后检验和Bonferroni校正、Friedman事后检验和Nemenyi事后检验对数据进行统计学分析,显著性水平设置为:结果显示,单锥封闭技术在冠状根水平上的NeoSEALER Flo穿透面积百分比显著高于侧压实技术。除此之外,两种封闭技术在nesealer Flo的穿透距离、穿透距离百分比以及中根尖和根尖水平的面积穿透百分比方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:单锥体封闭技术可与生物陶瓷封闭器配合使用,其效果与冷侧压实技术相当。(eej - 2024 - 12 - 192)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Obturation Technique on NeoSEALER Flo Bioceramic Sealer Penetration into Dentinal Tubules: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.

Objective: This study compared the dentinal tubule penetration of NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealer using single cone and cold lateral compaction obturation techniques.

Methods: Eighteen extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into two groups (n=9) according to the obturation technique used. The maximum penetration depth in microns, percentage of penetration depth, and percentage of penetration area of the NeoSEALER Flo bioceramic sealer were assessed using confocal laser scanning microscopy at different root levels; coronal, middle, and apical. Data was statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis's test followed by Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction and Friedman's test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test with the significance level set at p<0.05.

Results: The single cone obturation technique has shown a statistically significantly higher percentage area of NeoSEALER Flo penetration than the lateral compaction technique at the coronal root level only. Otherwise, both obturation techniques have shown no statistically significant differences in NeoSEALER Flo penetration distance, percentage of penetration distance, and percentage of area penetration at the middle and apical root levels.

Conclusion: The single cone obturation technique can be used with bioceramic sealers yielding comparable results to the cold lateral compaction technique. (EEJ-2024-12-192).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信